Locked

1990s-2000s Nostalgia Mafia (DP1)

Started by Kohai

Replies
728
Posts
729
Page
21 / 25

Conversation

Total: 729
ISO #601 •••

Yeah, I really don't love Vader's claim and, especially given the fake claims scum received, I have a hard time buying it. I'll give this some more thought before I VTL, but that response to being VTL'd isn't helping his case.

Edit post

ISO #602 •••

I also think whiteflame would have caved to the pressure by now but idk

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #603 •••

Why is pie in the POE again?

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #604 •••
--> @Lunatic
one thing I will say about whiteflame if he is scum, to look for his partner look for someone he isn't interacting with much. I notice as scum he barely interacts with his scum partner. You guys barely talked to each other in the last game and I feel like I remember that being consistent with games Ive been scum with him in too.


Usually true, yes.

Edit post

ISO #605 •••
--> @awesome5000
I can enable or disable day chats. If I die, all day chats are disabled


So how can you enable or disable chats but chats are disabled when you die?


If mafia chat was the only day chat, my role would be strictly -EV, which is why I talked about masons and neighbors

Edit post

ISO #606 •••
--> @Lunatic

It’s him or wf. Who do you want and why


I’m okay with one and then the other.


the fake claim thing is entirely relevant



pie said affiliation lock. You can’t fake claim into that. He’s just either lying and buying time or he’s town



you can get a fake claim of like a doc or a cop. Which wf said his role was town only. And supa just claimed with only pressure from me




Edit post

ISO #607 •••
--> @Mikal
It’s him or wf. Who do you want and why

Kind of neither. I am flipping back on supa. I town read his crash out, and whiteflame would have caved to the pressure by now, and is still resistant to claiming. I feel like theres probably a good reason for that. And we have a lot of claims on the board. If I am forced to lynch one of the two I'd almost rather no lynch, but with everyone online I can see us getting a lynch. I don't neccesarily want more claims though. So Idk.

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #608 •••
--> @Lunatic
Kind of neither. I am flipping back on supa. I town read his crash out, and whiteflame would have caved to the pressure by now, and is still resistant to claiming. I feel like theres probably a good reason for that. And we have a lot of claims on the board. If I am forced to lynch one of the two I'd almost rather no lynch, but with everyone online I can see us getting a lynch. I don't neccesarily want more claims though. So Idk.


We don't have a no lynch option. The lynch is mandatory.

Edit post

ISO #609 •••
--> @whiteflame

Has Supa ever raged out before being lynched like that as scum? The two games I can recall him being scum in he just kind of sadly withered away and died once he thought it was hopeless.


Awesome, if he can't turn off chats at will and needs to die to do it, at least has positive utility even if he ends up being town so he's the safer option mechanically. And his flip reveals info on Airmax either way. However, I do find Whiteflame to be scummier. He kind of artfully redirected a pretty strong lynch consensus on him and Awesome to Supa and Awesome. I feel like he just picked the next most scummiest player and pushed hard for it to remove himself from consideration. If WF is scum I'm fairly certain both are town.

Edit post

ISO #610 •••
given the fake claims scum received

Is this TMI?

Edit post

ISO #611 •••
--> @RexFavilla

https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/12502-castlevania-mafia-dp2?page=1&post_number=29

Edit post

ISO #612 •••
--> @whiteflame
Alright, now that's interesting. So there is effectively mod confirmation that your role is in this game. That does explain your earlier statement on Masons as well.


Doesnt confirm his affiliation though. And there’s still the question of the lack of win con in his PM. My theory is that as scum, he probably has an ability to disable chats, or it’s some sort of anti claim feature

Edit post

ISO #613 •••

Did David say anything about fake claims? I don't recall him doing so.

Edit post

ISO #614 •••
--> @whiteflame
We don't have a no lynch option. The lynch is mandatory.

Idk both feel like mislynches to me though.


Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #615 •••
--> @Lunatic

Read Dayphase above. Just looked for a game where he was pissed or crashed out and he def does it as scum

Edit post

ISO #616 •••
--> @Mikal

Okay nevermind lol.

Edit post

ISO #617 •••
--> @RexFavilla

i messaged him after Supas claim and he responded yes. You are free to check this

Edit post

ISO #618 •••
--> @RexFavilla
Has Supa ever raged out before being lynched like that as scum? The two games I can recall him being scum in he just kind of sadly withered away and died once he thought it was hopeless.


It's been a while since I've played with him as scum, but it wouldn't be the first time I've seen him rage quit as scum or town.


Awesome, if he can't turn off chats at will and needs to die to do it, at least has positive utility even if he ends up being town so he's the safer option mechanically. And his flip reveals info on Airmax either way. However, I do find Whiteflame to be scummier. He kind of artfully redirected a pretty strong lynch consensus on him and Awesome to Supa and Awesome. I feel like he just picked the next most scummiest player and pushed hard for it to remove himself from consideration. If WF is scum I'm fairly certain both are town.


I've said multiple times if people want my claim, I'll give it. I think we're shooting ourselves in the foot with so many claims with the anti-claim mechanic in play, particularly if we have anyone we're reading as scum (and I know I do), but if that's what everyone decides they want at this point with all these claims on the table, then I will.

Edit post

ISO #619 •••
--> @ILikePie5
Doesnt confirm his affiliation though. And there’s still the question of the lack of win con in his PM. My theory is that as scum, he probably has an ability to disable chats, or it’s some sort of anti claim feature


Could be. I can't say I'm townreading him off of his claim alone.

Edit post

ISO #620 •••
--> @Mikal
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/12502-castlevania-mafia-dp2?page=1&post_number=29


That game was kind of different, and he admitted to being scum right after. I had basically caught them based on shoddy claims after just watching the show lol that wasn't nearly the same type of crash out as he is here, where he is literally talking about quitting mafia.


Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #621 •••
--> @Lunatic
Idk both feel like mislynches to me though.


If you have another option, I'm open to discussing it. We do have to make a decision, though.

Edit post

ISO #622 •••

I know my position of lynching people without them claiming is seen as insane but this is why I do it. How many people have claimed DP1 now? It may make sense on an individual level but the compound effects are anti-town.

Edit post

ISO #623 •••
--> @Mikal
i am okay with backing off awesome. Whether he is town or not will solve itself. 

How so?

Edit post

ISO #624 •••
--> @Vader
Alright well I’m the tracker and I’m Steve from blues clues 

tough shit if I die atp. Town deserve it for forcing claims in an anti mass claim mechanic


So you went from saying you’re not going to be claiming no matter what to claiming. I can see the justification, but what’s the justification Kohai gave?

Edit post

ISO #625 •••
--> @Mikal
awsomes role is in the op and kinda validates that role being in the game. Which to be fair he did say off the rip 


It’s a direct counter to Max’s claimed role. Makes sense for scum to have something like what Awesome is claiming. Also note that he said he could enable/disable the ability, but if he died it would be perma disabled.

Edit post

ISO #626 •••
--> @Vader

Bro are you scummin it up right now

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #627 •••
--> @ILikePie5

am I the only one who read it differently?

Edit post

ISO #628 •••
--> @Vader
Yeah I’m done playing this fucking game lol this is bullshit

Fuck this


This a confession?


Edit post

ISO #629 •••
--> @ILikePie5

I did read it wrong.


i thought he said it enabled on him dying. That does change my read a bit

Edit post

ISO #630 •••
--> @Mikal
Awesome won’t matter. That will solve itself


Would you like to explain how?

Edit post