Locked In progress 12 alive

Stereotype Mafia Day Phase 1

Started by Lunatic

Day Phase
Loading...
Replies
771
Posts
772
Page
8 / 26
Game Info
Main Host: Lunatic
Base Elimination Threshold: 7
Day Phase Ends:

Conversation

Total: 772
ISO #211 •••
--> @Wryly


Wryly wrote:

whiteflame wrote:

Thoth wrote:
whiteflame wrote:
Option #4 limits the possible claims to one of those 3 areas. If it just laying out the actual theme split, then why would scum post #3 at all?
I was just saying that this is a plausible example of a theme split, not the actual theme split.

And my point is that there are an absurd number of possible splits and ways to split characters with this theme. That’s my point: the presence of a theme split doesn’t put a lot of pressure on scum because it would almost certainly be difficult to parse out anyway.

Well never mind lol I misunderstood you.

It seems to me that if you were told you'd be getting no fake claims but could make up any game mechanic you wanted, you'd probably want a game mechanic that offsets the loss of being given no fake claims.

Saying there's no theme split allows you to straight claim your characters with virtually no risk, which is preferable to the some-to-moderate risk of straight claiming when everyone knows there is a theme split.


yeah my thoughts exactly

Edit post

ISO #212 •••

Automated Vote Count

This vote count was generated by the mafia vote bot.


Ultracrepidarian (4/7): ILikePie5 (p#12), RexFavilla (p#135), Kohai (p#208), Banana (p#209)

Helz (2/7): Magoroth (p#87), Thoth (p#189)

Magoroth (1/7): Mikal (p#6)

RexFavilla (1/7): Ultracrepidarian (p#200)


Not Voting (4): Casey_Risk, Helz, whiteflame (p#132), Wryly


With 12 players alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Day phase ends in 2 days, 13 hours.

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #213 •••

Woah that escalated quickly

Edit post

ISO #214 •••

Wait nvm I'm still only at four

Edit post

ISO #215 •••
--> @Thoth


Thoth wrote:
The wording “Mafia Tailor” strikes me as odd. Why would any other alignment have a Tailor? Something about that wording stands out to me as being in Lunatic’s pen.

like u think the tailor is false?

Edit post

ISO #216 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian

What’s ur claim

Edit post

ISO #217 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian


Ultracrepidarian wrote:
If I had to guess I would say the lie is five, purely because that's what I would choose as mafia for fake claiming.

interesting

Edit post

ISO #218 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian


Ultracrepidarian wrote:
VTL: RexFavilla

did u ever explain this vote

Edit post

ISO #219 •••

2 avoid anoter shinnnningg insedent, Im gona wunnt a klaim from ultra@

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #220 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian


Ultracrepidarian wrote:
Wait nvm I'm still only at four

4 is a lot what u wanna do about that

Edit post

ISO #221 •••

Well ideally I would prefer to be lynched. I thought it was pretty clear the vote wasn't too serious, like basically every vote before it

Edit post

ISO #222 •••

Crap not to be lynched please don't kill me

Edit post

ISO #223 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian


Ultracrepidarian wrote:
Crap not to be lynched please don't kill me


klaim or dye

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #224 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian

can u claim plz

Edit post

ISO #225 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian

can u claim plz

Edit post

ISO #226 •••
--> @Kohai

it feels like hes stalling i dont liek this

Edit post

ISO #227 •••
--> @Banana
Banana wrote:
like u think the tailor is false?

Probably not false

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #228 •••

You know it wasn't like this back in my day

Edit post

ISO #229 •••

I feel like this discussion about making the real game mechanic stand up has distracted us from playing the game, though. It's probably best that we revisit this topic once we have flips.

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #230 •••
--> @Banana


Banana wrote:
it feels like hes stalling i dont liek this

+1


hicccipppp

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #231 •••
--> @Banana

You just want everything to be handed to you. Y'know when I was your age I won mafia games while walking to school uphill, BOTH WAYS!

Edit post

ISO #232 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian


Ultracrepidarian wrote:
You just want everything to be handed to you. Y'know when I was your age I won mafia games while walking to school uphill, BOTH WAYS!


Okk so kan u give us something??? Evin f it isn’t a full klaim give usss thoughts on da game stateee

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #233 •••

Im making a curry give me like fifteen minutes

Edit post

ISO #234 •••
--> @Ultracrepidarian


Ultracrepidarian wrote:
Im making a curry give me like fifteen minutes

I will give u 15 minz exactlyyyy. If u don’t give us sumthing subtantial den im down to lynch u

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #235 •••

Time iz up

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #236 •••
--> @Wryly


Wryly wrote:

whiteflame wrote:

Thoth wrote:
whiteflame wrote:
Option #4 limits the possible claims to one of those 3 areas. If it just laying out the actual theme split, then why would scum post #3 at all?
I was just saying that this is a plausible example of a theme split, not the actual theme split.

And my point is that there are an absurd number of possible splits and ways to split characters with this theme. That’s my point: the presence of a theme split doesn’t put a lot of pressure on scum because it would almost certainly be difficult to parse out anyway.

Well never mind lol I misunderstood you.

It seems to me that if you were told you'd be getting no fake claims but could make up any game mechanic you wanted, you'd probably want a game mechanic that offsets the loss of being given no fake claims.

Saying there's no theme split allows you to straight claim your characters with virtually no risk, which is preferable to the some-to-moderate risk of straight claiming when everyone knows there is a theme split.


It’s a fair point. I’m thinking short term on this (i.e. the first two or three DPs assuming at most one scum flip) and I can see it being hard to discern, but I take your point that it would matter a lot later. It is more testable, though, so the advantage only lasts as long as it takes to discern a split and lynch someone on the other side of it to see if the split is real.

Edit post

ISO #237 •••

Alright, first there's the matter of which statement is false. I have no memory whatsoever of past games moderated by Luna but from what I've heard I'm increasingly beginning to think it's number three.

1 - Very little help to mafia

2 - This is probably the second most likely, but it's been mentioned that Luna generally has tailors in his games

3 - Considering that no fake claims were given this definitely makes sense for the mafia to choose, it's probably the first thing that would come to my mind if could feed the town one lie as mafia

4 - Not helpful for mafia

5 - I am now fairly sure it's not this one


Obviously, I don't have any very strong reads on anybody on the moment. I still need to give the thread a deeper read through beyond my passive phone checking throughout the day so I'll probably have more thoughts on this soon

Edit post

ISO #238 •••
--> @Banana


Banana wrote:

whiteflame wrote:

Thoth wrote:
whiteflame wrote:
Option #4 limits the possible claims to one of those 3 areas. If it just laying out the actual theme split, then why would scum post #3 at all?
I was just saying that this is a plausible example of a theme split, not the actual theme split.

And my point is that there are an absurd number of possible splits and ways to split characters with this theme. That’s my point: the presence of a theme split doesn’t put a lot of pressure on scum because it would almost certainly be difficult to parse out anyway.
i was thinking that one would be a good option for scum to choose. if we think there’s no theme split we don’t have a lot of basis to sus ppl on their claims. if we lynch people we can tie scum with other scum. it leaves us with just role analysis


And behavior, but yeah, it does basically nix any flavor analysis. I take Wryly’s and your point, there’s value in it for scum.

Edit post

ISO #239 •••

Can someone point me to the reason for sussing Ultra? Is it just the VTL out of nowhere?

Edit post

ISO #240 •••
--> @whiteflame

I thought I was being funny :(

Edit post