-->
@Thoth
Originally Posted by Thoth on 7/20/2026 at 1:29 AM (post #129)
Again, I don't really see the point of a Hated that deactivates before it could give scum a free mislynch. If we weren't going to lynch a Hated claimant, we would cast their votes so as to avoid lynching them, and if we were going to lynch them, they would get lynched anyway. The numbers change, but how we should coordinate our votes does not. It's like the whole purpose of the role is just to be SOP-claimable, unless we are so retarded that we all independently swing around votes without worrying about coordination or the risk of a mislynch. A Hated that doesn't deactivate when scum can freely mislynch them is probably too dangerous to put in a game.
Like I said, I've seen both versions in the game before. I agree that the version that deactivates at a certain point is mainly there to be SOP claimable.
The big question is, do we think that Pie might fake this claim? Initially, I would have said yes. I think we have to have some doubt over it by default since it's a relatively safe claim to give. He did out it early, but then there's that DP3 deactivation, which I've never seen before.
The more I've thought about it, though, the more I buy the claim. I don't think Pie inserts the DP3 deactivation into a fake claim, that seems like something done by a mod who wants to prevent similar problems to those we encountered with the Popular deactivating at MYLO last game. I've got a slight town lean on him for that and some minor behavioral reads. I'm willing to revisit him later in the game, but at least for this DP, I find him believable.