Locked

Deltarune Mafia: Chapter 2

Started by Casey_Risk

Replies
272
Posts
273
Page
2 / 10

Conversation

Total: 273
ISO #31 •••
--> @whiteflame

Also if we're going off theme - Caroler could mean Noelle Holiday or Rudy since their personalities are Christmas inspired.


Sorry I'm infodumping just thinking out loud

Edit post

ISO #32 •••

My character is male.

Edit post

ISO #33 •••
--> @Kohai
I wouldn’t put too much emphasis on character claims as much as roll claims.


I wouldn’t emphasize role splits right now, though getting full claims increase the odds of CCs, so there’s value in getting all of them.

Edit post

ISO #34 •••
--> @McDonaldsReal
Also if we're going off theme - Caroler could mean Noelle Holiday or Rudy since their personalities are Christmas inspired.

Sorry I'm infodumping just thinking out loud


Not bad to speculate since we don’t know who it is, but in case they do partially claim, we want to avoid giving scum too much insight into what that means.

Edit post

ISO #35 •••
--> @whiteflame

Though the draw back is the anti claim mechanism. But I want to get something from Thoth, Mikal, and Shinning at the very least

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #36 •••
--> @Kohai
Though the draw back is the anti claim mechanism. But I want to get something from Thoth, Mikal, and Shinning at the very least


Yeah, I think partial claims from all three make sense to start.

Edit post

ISO #37 •••
--> @whiteflame

That's a good point sorry

Edit post

ISO #38 •••
--> @McDonaldsReal

All good, I like that you’re thinking about this stuff and it helps orient me a bit since I don’t know much about the games.

Edit post

ISO #39 •••

How did Casey implement anti claims in their past games?

Edit post

ISO #40 •••

Votes:


Shining (1/5): RT


Friend inside me

Edit post

ISO #41 •••
--> @Shining
How did Casey implement anti claims in their past games?


I'm checking back now. Here's what Casey said in The Russian Mafia endgame:


  1. Anti-claim: Once per night, you may name any player and a corresponding character and role. If that player is the named character and has the named role, they will become Fragile for the night and therefore be unable to be protected from the Night Kill by any town protective roles.


On that basis, yes, I think avoiding full claims up front is best practice, since we avoid similar mechanics being able to be used to their fullest. While we're at it, everyone make sure to check and see if you received anything like "Fragile" in your message from Casey at the start of this DP. Given the lack of full claims, I doubt it, but best to check.

Edit post

ISO #42 •••
--> @whiteflame

I have nothing about being fragile; however given that I'm proven to be popular my popular mechanic may have been disabled.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #43 •••

Well, is that the only anti claim they use? Its a little dangerous to assume its it different. Otherwise it seems to leave the town meta of mass claiming your character unpunished.

Edit post

ISO #44 •••
--> @Kohai

Wait a sec, why did you immediately claim in DP1? Is that normal? I guess that's all you would have to go on in the first DP but... IDK man I'm still confused why you would immediately

Edit post

ISO #45 •••
--> @Shining
Well, is that the only anti claim they use? Its a little dangerous to assume its it different. Otherwise it seems to leave the town meta of mass claiming your character unpunished.


I don't think we should assume it's exactly the same, I'm just pointing to the only anti-claim mechanic we've seen Casey implement as a point of reference. I think seeking partial claims should be a starting point since it bears a lower risk of making such mechanics usable by scum, and we can work up from there as needed.

Edit post

ISO #46 •••
--> @Kohai
I have nothing about being fragile; however given that I'm proven to be popular my popular mechanic may have been disabled.


That would be a different kind of anti-claim, but it's possible. I'd be surprised if you weren't informed about it, though we don't need to re-test your Popular claim regardless.

Edit post

ISO #47 •••
--> @whiteflame
That would be a different kind of anti-claim, but it's possible. I'd be surprised if you weren't informed about it, though we don't need to re-test your Popular claim regardless.


Right. And I'm honestly glad we were able to prove I was popular before an anti-claim mechanism disabled that popularity. Looking back I think claiming popular and proving it right off the bat was a good move.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #48 •••

I want a claim from wf


and I don’t want to say why

Edit post

ISO #49 •••
--> @Mikal

So the first thing you do after you join the discussion in this DP is seek my claim? That's a little weird given what we've heard from RT. Any thoughts about your name being among that trio he received?

Edit post

ISO #50 •••
--> @Mikal, @whiteflame

Wait a sec. You criticized in the first DP that RT claimed and now you're asking for more claims when we know that there might be an anti claim mechanic. Granted I'm a little sus of everyone cause I'm new so maybe I'm just being too jumpy. But like... Why not you claim first then? Just partially? That said this could be WF deflecting too IDK (it's hard to sus him out cause he acts trustworthy and I have my money on him doing this basically every game). Would it be too much of an issue for us to claim gender? I don't wanna rock the boat but I do wanna advance the game too

Edit post

ISO #51 •••
--> @Mikal, @whiteflame

To be clear, Mikal I think was sus of RT

Edit post

ISO #52 •••

I’m surprised Mikal is suspicious of McDonald and Whiteflame I town read both of them largely based on effort and in depth thought analysis as well as theme input

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #53 •••
--> @Lunatic

I don't think he sussed me.

Edit post

ISO #54 •••
--> @McDonaldsReal

Right

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #55 •••

As of right now my POE is thoth, ultra, shining and mike. I have decent reason to town read everyone else.

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #56 •••
--> @Lunatic

Out of your POE who do you think is most likely to flip wolf?

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #57 •••

I just looked up the caroler roll and my result makes so much sense:


The Caroler may each night visit a person and sing them a carol. The carol will inform the targeted player of 3 names, at least one of which is mafia. However, if the targeted person is visiting someone on that night, they will not hear the carol. The Caroler may not choose the same player on consecutive nights.


https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/database/mafia-roles/role/?mafiarole=Caroler


If this is the case then there is a guaranteed wolf within Mikal, Thoth, and Shining.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #58 •••
--> @Kohai
Out of your POE who do you think is most likely to flip wolf?

Tough to say right now, let's see how this day phase plays out. I want to hear why mike is scum reading whiteflame though.

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #59 •••
--> @Kohai

It depends on how casey divvies dreamer results too. Technically both scum can be on a dreamer result, but I feel like most mods dont really do that for mod psyche reasons. Like if we were to systematically start lynching through your results, and hit both scum, mafia would be pretty pissed. So I feel like the mod would leave one outside, so if your results are to be believed, then its one of the three on your results, plus ultra. Obviously a lot of that is mod psyche with early game POE, but that's where I am at.

Edit post

In loving Memory of Lannan and Ajab, fallen debaters.

ISO #60 •••
--> @McDonaldsReal
Wait a sec. You criticized in the first DP that RT claimed and now you're asking for more claims when we know that there might be an anti claim mechanic.


It is unusual, though if I'm reading Mikal's first post right, he's implying some role-related reason for sussing me. Possible he's just interpreting something Casey said to him or something I said in this DP or the previous one, but if it's any of those, he has even less reason to keep them secret.


Granted I'm a little sus of everyone cause I'm new so maybe I'm just being too jumpy. But like... Why not you claim first then? Just partially?


If it is role related, I understand wanting to keep it secret, though his appearance on RT's results makes it pretty likely he'll have to claim regardless unless he has good reason not to buy them, in which case he should be sussing RT.


That said this could be WF deflecting too IDK (it's hard to sus him out cause he acts trustworthy and I have my money on him doing this basically every game).


Yeah, that's fair. I wouldn't say I'm exactly the same every game (wish I was that good), but this isn't too far from how I act in any given game, whether as scum or town. Others can pick up on more subtle cues that may be more telling.


To be clear, Mikal I think was sus of RT


I agree that he was drawing some attention to RT, but I'm not sure if he's sussing him right now.

Edit post