Locked

Deltarune Mafia: Chapter 2

Started by Casey_Risk

Replies
272
Posts
273
Page
5 / 10

Conversation

Total: 273
ISO #121 •••
--> @Kohai
In your role does it say how many wolves are guaranteed to be in the result? Does it say one or at least one?


At least one.

Edit post

ISO #122 •••
--> @Kohai
If Mikal knew that you visited me and that I already revealed my results then it looks like Mikal was trying to PR hunt.


*sigh* and you wonder why I wanted his claim first...

Edit post

ISO #123 •••
--> @Mikal

@Mikal I definitely want your claim.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #124 •••
--> @Mikal

Frankly, if we're not focused on Mikal, Thoth and Shining for this rest of this DP, I don't even know what we're doing here. I've laid it all out on the table and I have pretty good reason to believe that RT is town despite all this frustration, so I believe the results he received are genuine. If others don't want to use that information for some reason, then you'd better be sussing at least one of us.


So I'd like role claims, starting with Mikal.


VTL Mikal

Edit post

ISO #125 •••
--> @Mikal, @Kohai, @RexFavilla, @whiteflame

VTL Mikal


I second that. And WF if there's literally anyone who can protect you I think you'll be fine.


If there is a second mafia I think it's RexFavilla

Edit post

ISO #126 •••
--> @whiteflame

I’m the beholder. I get informative information back if I target an information role. I was told

you did not receive information. You implied you were visiting someone, so I wanted to see if you were going to lie and fake claim a result.

Edit post

ISO #127 •••

Votes: (as of #128)


Mikal (2/5): RT, McDonalds

Thoth (1/5): Whiteflame


Susie, the violet tormentor, is now your ally. The power of mean girls shines within you.

Edit post

ISO #128 •••
--> @Mikal, @Thoth
I’m the beholder. I get informative information back if I target an information role. I was told
you did not receive information. You implied you were visiting someone, so I wanted to see if you were going to lie and fake claim a result.


Man, if this is real, it's such a frustrating reason to draw attention to me, especially after I said twice that I did not receive a result. I get that your vote wasn't up on me, but getting my claim should not have been necessary to confirm this.


I'll leave it there for now, though.


Unvote

VTL Thoth


You're up.

Edit post

ISO #129 •••
--> @Mikal
I’m the beholder. I get informative information back if I target an information role. I was told


Yeah. I'm definitely NOT town reading this especially since you already had the results. From mafiascum:


A Beholder in scum hands can serve as a partial counter to the massclaim strategy that's less overbearing than a Roleblocker or Juggernaut (and has less chance of unbalancing the setup if no massclaim is attempted); unlike most massclaim-counter roles, it does not entirely shut the town down, but does make it somewhat easier for the scum to play around their actions. (On the flip side of that, a Beholder in town hands makes massclaiming more powerful, as it makes the action much easier to aim and helps to mitigate the downside via rescuing a result once the scum start killing your investigatives. Thus, town Beholders should not be included in setups where massclaiming would otherwise be powerful.)


Beholder can be both town and mafia. In this case the beholder is more likely a mafia role. https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Beholder#Use_&_Balance

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #130 •••
--> @Mikal, @Shining, @Thoth

Unvote

VTL Thoth


Claim please


I think it's either Thoth or Shining.

Edit post

ISO #131 •••

If there's an anti-claim mechanic then a beholder is a perfect role for anti-claims.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #132 •••
--> @Kohai

David I love you but lord your reads are all over the place sometimes lol.

Edit post

ISO #133 •••

Asked Casey. I can’t get results off whiteflame but I target his target, I would learn those results. Makes sense from

a balance perspective



I buy wf

I also buy David



I’ll trust the dreamer result given how wf has played and it makes since from balance. So it’s shining or Thoth

Edit post

ISO #134 •••

VTL RT


i want to retest this popular first

Edit post

ISO #135 •••

If it works. I’m good with situationally town blocking David and wf

Edit post

ISO #136 •••
--> @Mikal
i want to retest this popular first


Why test again? Popular has already been proven. Plus there may be a mechanic that disables my popular modifier.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #137 •••

There's zero town utility in retesting a popular claim - especially if there's an iota of a chance the modifier gets disabled through some anti-claim mechanism or other mechanism.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #138 •••

I'll talk more in an hour or two when I get back, but for now: did we actually test that popular claim? It said on day 1 that we needed six votes to reach majority. Day 1, post #129, Casey said that McDonalds' vote and immediate unvote brought RT to a high of six votes.

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #139 •••

I really don't appreciate WF outting his role. I also don't understand why he wants to test RT again, it seems pretty foolish to me. Ah well. I do think the way you guys tested RT's popular are a little silly.

Edit post

ISO #140 •••
--> @Thoth

He tested it. But I’ve seen 1x popular mafia as a way to help them in the past. Popular should only deactivate at mylo lylo

Edit post

ISO #141 •••

My popularity does end at MyLo/LyLo but we are far from that stage. Still there's a small chance that it could have been deactivated through some other means.

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #142 •••
--> @Thoth
I'll talk more in an hour or two when I get back, but for now: did we actually test that popular claim? It said on day 1 that we needed six votes to reach majority. Day 1, post #129, Casey said that McDonalds' vote and immediate unvote brought RT to a high of six votes.


I interpreted that post by Casey to mean that RT was brought to 6 votes, which would have resulted in his lynch if he was not Popular. Unless we have good reason not to believe that, I don't think there's value in testing it again.

Edit post

ISO #143 •••
--> @Shining
I really don't appreciate WF outting his role. I also don't understand why he wants to test RT again, it seems pretty foolish to me. Ah well. I do think the way you guys tested RT's popular are a little silly.


The one person who should have had the most reason to accept the hints I was giving him kept pushing for me to claim, so I either would have remained a major focus for the rest of this DP and split decisions around my vote or I would have been pushed to claim later, which meant wasting more time either way. I don't like it, either, but I didn't see another avenue.


I didn't say that I wanted to test RT's role again.

Edit post

ISO #144 •••
--> @Mikal
He tested it. But I’ve seen 1x popular mafia as a way to help them in the past. Popular should only deactivate at mylo lylo


I've seen just straight up Popular mafia. It happened last game. To be fair, I thought it was pretty odd for RT to speculate that his role might have been deactivated somehow, but I'm not scumreading that statement and I don't think re-testing his role is a worthwhile use of our time.

Edit post

ISO #145 •••
--> @whiteflame

Sorry, I worded that poorly. I meant to say Mikal shouldn't have asked to test RT again.

Edit post

ISO #146 •••
--> @Shining

WF didn't put his own claim. Everyone else forced him. He's the towniest town in the world

Edit post

ISO #147 •••
--> @whiteflame

There is some weird tmi stuff for sure. May have mentioned this earlier. Happened last day phase as well. I have you town locked and I’m interested to see if it sticks.


I only did popular mafia to teach town a lesson about affiliation last game. But something about RT bothers me. If we test and it works again. Im

happy to leave it alone for now.

Edit post

ISO #148 •••

keep in mind you are town and he can mafia lying about the results. I think it’s unlikely but I do want to see if that role has stuck.

Edit post

ISO #149 •••

Wf is def near town locked for me. The way he handled the pressure. Responded and general logic really comes off as town and very similar to last game

Edit post

ISO #150 •••

Unvote


Waiting for Thoth to post.

Edit post