@Savant
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.
I really really really don't think you should be a representative guide to the behavior of the rest of us,
On some strange planet maybe, but not here.
Especially because it wasn't that long ago that you were doing hundreds of posts arguing the age of consent should be eliminated so you could fuck children.
He loves it when you talk dirty.
SergeantLynch wrote:
Debby wrote:
You need to upgrade your value system.
How do you propose that I do that.
You can't, if you don't have a value system, you can't upgrade it.
My thoughts entirely.
Circumstances and not just the age of consent are considered before passing judgement.
Hmmmm, didn't God get a 14 year old virgin pregnant?
Neither God nor Jesus or Mary denied that.
Well, GOD buggered off never to return, Jesus wasn't born and as for Mary, no one is sure.
Nonetheless, it gave rise to the expression, Fu-k Me Jesus Christ for God's Sake.
Not sure of the Hebrew translation.
That would be considered blasphemy in any language.
Fortunately I am an atheist.
How would that work? While admittedly I'm unfamiliar with that aspect of the law, it seems to me that it's easier to throw an 18 year old in jail for banging a 14 year old than it is a 17 year old. Would the law cease to acknowledge the legal distinction between a college sophomore and a middle schooler?
Trump demonstrated 80 year olds like him can also be guilty exploiting minors.
I guess he was probably younger and more upright in those days.
It didn’t help. Women sued him all the same.
Well, women suing is big business...In fact in the US, suing in general is big business.
That is how you demand Justice.
Not really...If justice was the ultimate goal it would be done for free...Litigation is primarily a for profit industry.
You need experts to interpret the law and that cost money.
Exactly.
Trump has 800 cases files against his executive orders and over4,000 cases against his business and personal misconduct.