"We are going to oppress and imprison and violate trans people for 2000 years, but today they got some meaningless reward and that is injustice" - transphobe.

It is not injustice, but ignorance of the knowledge of what women and men are, and are not. Interchangeablity, but by a headtrip, is in the not column.

Transgender individuals may have variations in their DNA that influence their gender identity. Research has identified genetic variations in 20 genes that may play a role in transgender identity. These variations are not definitive causes of gender identity but may contribute to the differences in hormone processing and brain development that some transgender individuals experience. The study by the Hudson Institute of Medical Research found significant overrepresentation of certain genes in transgender women compared to non-transgender males, indicating a potential biological basis for gender dysphoria. 

It is important to note that while genetic factors may influence gender identity, they are not the sole determining factor. Gender identity is a complex interplay of biological, genetic, and social factors. 

This mag doesn't mean a thing to sane people in UK. These things only appeal to superficial borderline insane people.

Ohhh you care about glamour. Ohhhh ohhhh baby that's so sane and a good goal.

😂

Sane women focus on other stuff and sane, stable men don't want some dolled up trophy wife, they want a true Queen to their Kingdom.

America is getting to the point they dont care about gender identity, you either xx or xy.

Frankly im glad the madness is being oppressed and denounced.

XX or XY are not conclusive regarding gender, for instance, a man born with XY chromosomes can actually become a woman by reading Glamour Magazine.

Are you saying gender is determined by what the person reads?

Are you saying gender is determined by what the person reads?

Yes, based on the fact that only women read Glamour Magazine.

The fact that a trans woman appeared on its cover proves men read it too.

The fact that a trans woman appeared on its cover proves men read it too.

And those men become women, pay attention.

The men became women to appear in a women’s magazine.

nope

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"

Protest? Is that all you've got?

A Lie, far more than “Vice,  

Is a monster of so frightful mien

As to be hated needs but to be seen;

Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,

We first endure, then pity, then embrace.”

𓋴𓏏𓇋𓎢𓈎𓐍𓇋𓏏𓐍𓇋𓈖𓐍𓇌𓅱𓅲𓂋𓐍𓅂𓄿𓂋

Transgender women face a variety of challenges and personal experiences regarding their transitions, which are deeply individual journeys [1]. Perceptions of "convincingness" often relate to societal standards of gender expression and presentation [1].

Many factors can influence how a transgender person is perceived, including:

1. Gender presentation: This involves clothing, makeup, and mannerisms [1].
2. Physical changes: Some individuals undergo hormone therapy and/or surgeries to align their physical appearance with their gender identity [1].
3. Personal choice and safety: Every transgender woman navigates her transition in a way that feels authentic and safe for her [1]. 

Focusing on a person's authenticity and respect for their identity, rather than how "convincing" they appear to others, is a more respectful approach to understanding the diverse experiences within the transgender community [1]. 

There are a few problems with your string of Egyptian hieroglyphs. making it apparent this is a Chat GPT construct, or some other AI disaster. There are 20 total characters in your string [you may think there are 22, but two sets, #'s 13/14, and 15/16 are really intended to be two-character ligatures, which are infrequently used in Egyptian, but they do occur. So, by the characters in your sequence: 

[1] [S29] should be a single line as shown at left to match all other characters in your string, not an outline, unless all other characters are also outlines. No ancient scribe, nor modern Egyptologist would or should blend the two styles.

[2] Characters 2,4,5,6,8 & 9, [X1, V31, N17, Aa1, Aa1] should not be represented by baselines that wander up and down within the vertical space occupied by those characters. They should be either all grounded on a common baseline, or a common line roughly in the vertical middle of the rest of the characters. There are further characters violating this rule, but those identified are sufficient to demonstrate lack of proper writing.

[3] Character 4 [V31] is backward. There are rules in ancient Egyptian of reading direction, and the characters face one direction if read left-to-right, or another direction R-to-L. All other characters face appropriately for L-to-R. They face to left if read L-to-R. An educated ancient scribe or modern Egyptologist would know this. The handle of the basket of V31 is to the right, therefore, to be read R-to-L, but the balance of the string is read L-R.

[4] Some characters, for compaction of space, should be stacked, such as #5/6 [N29, Aa1], one over the other, and minimized I'm size, or squeezed to fit in the vertical space. There are 3 other examples in this string.

As it happens, character [16], is a proper ligature.

Characters 18, 19 [G4, G1], in order, a buzzard and a vulture, do not appear together as represented here to form any word in ancient Egyptian. They are similar in appearance, and easy to confuse, but no skilled scribe would combine these two characters because of their distinct usage patterns. Two vultures together [G1] is, however, a common pairing. However, the previous 4 characters of the string do not form any ancient Egyptian word, or words in combination with the last characters. It's possible your two [18, 19] characters are really a vulture [G1] and a falcon [G5], but the same conditions as above are for this combination, as well.

S29 X1 V31 N29 Aa1 G4 G1 G5

Old Chinese proverb: when the finger points to the moon, the unlearned child looks at the finger.

There are a few problems with your string of Egyptian hieroglyphs. making it apparent this is a Chat GPT construct, or some other AI disaster.

LOL, nope, not AI, I just typed "Stick it in your ear" into some English to Hieroglyphics translator I Googled...couldn't care less if it's accurate, it's the thought that counts.

When you can snatch the pebble from my hand Grasshopper, you will know when you are being mocked.

New Chinese Proverb: People do not laugh at you because you tell jokes, they laugh because you are the joke.

There is no single, direct Chinese proverb meaning "you are a joke." However, proverbs about making a fool of oneself or being foolish in a way that is funny can be found in different contexts, such as the idea of being laughed at for one's foolish actions. A common theme in Chinese proverbs is self-awareness and humility, so there are many proverbs about making mistakes or being foolish in a lighthearted or humorous way.

 The most direct expression in common English is simply an insult: "You are a joke" or "Your life is a joke". However, these are modern insults, not traditional proverbs. 

some English to Hieroglyphics translator I Googled.

What's laughable, my friend, is that admission. Just what do you think drives some online, Googled [which, itself, is A.I.] English translator to hieroglyphs? A.I., that's what, which fails miserably when the English phrase contains a modern idiom not even intelligibly translated into French [for example] with syntaxal accuracy. And you expect it to stretch to antiquity?

Yes, we can read hieroglyphics, though it took the discovery of the Rosetta Stone to unlock the code in the 1820s. Today, many people can read them, from those with elementary knowledge to specialists, and resources like academic texts and apps exist to help people learn. 

Yes, I am familiar with Jean-Francois Champollion and the Rosetta Stone translation. It was his work that inspired my desire to learn ancient Egyptian grammar, having studied French in high school and college [and living there a few years] and Greek in college.

However, the ratio of the number of people who are fluent [read/write] in Egyptian hieroglyphs is no better than about 1:1M. Just not that many people are sufficiently curious to acquire the facility, mainly because it is a dead language. I was curious, anyway. A.I. does not help, mainly because the ratio of people who can write code to educate A.I. and are fluent Egyptologist's is a significantly lower ratio, maybe something like 1:500M. My experience, to date, with people who assume they can do both is dismal, as Sidewalker's example demonstrates.

some English to Hieroglyphics translator I Googled.

What's laughable, my friend, is that admission. Just what do you think drives some online, Googled [which, itself, is A.I.] English translator to hieroglyphs? A.I., that's what, which fails miserably when the English phrase contains a modern idiom not even intelligibly translated into French [for example] with syntaxal accuracy. And you expect it to stretch to antiquity?

LOL

Bless your heart

The Gospels and the New Testament were originally written in Greek. Is your language skills better than your faith?

Greek is the fourth language in which I've read the Bible [the Septuagint], the other three being English, French, and Italian.

Why are you relying on Egyptian hieroglyphs today?

I am fascinated by their ancient culture. I believe they invented the idea of due process, for example.

Ancient Egyptians did not invent the modern concept of 

due process of law. That concept developed from English common law, stemming from clause 39 of the Magna Carta in 1215, with the phrase "due process of law" first appearing in an English statute in 1354.