Shortest online relationship ever???

Started by SatanLucy

Replies
29
Posts
30
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••

Online relationships are very sensitive and can end very quickly.


One wrong word and you are blocked.


But sometimes, it doesnt even have to be a word...


You can actually lose online relationships for many dumb reasons. Not responding in time, making comments to other women so girlfriend gets jealous and blocks you, or even other women commenting on you.


But today I had what is probably shortest online relationship ever...


It lasted about 10 minutes. Basically some girl messaged me, strongly implied she wants relationship, we exchanged just a few messages, I asked her if she likes head pats and tickling, and she said yes to head pats and no to tickling, then out of nowhere she just blocks me and writes on her account that I cheated on her.


My guess is she got jealous of me exchanging comments with other women. Still, how did I manage to cheat 10 minutes after relationship started? I am actually a bit confused, because I am sure I couldnt possibly cheat, but I am not sure what even counts as cheating in online relationships.


Is any exchange of words with other women cheating? Because if so, then these online relationships are extremely difficult to manage, maybe even more difficult than real life relationships.


But anyway, the relationship lasted 10 minutes. I think that has to be some record for shortest relationship ever.


Online relationships might not actually be such a good idea after all. I am constantly tense from idea that one wrong move means I get blocked forever.


AI girlfriends would never block me...

Edit comment

#2 •••

Nice sample size

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#3 •••

Twelve-year-olds can be so fickle.

Edit post

#4 •••

Had a woman asking to be my sugar momma. Said no. Does that count? If so. Took 10 seconds.

Edit post

#5 •••

Ive had some decent relationships online though, still friends with one person i met 7 years ago on discord.

Edit post

#6 •••
@melcharaz

Yep, best way to avoid fluid transfer and microorganism exchange.



Edit post

#7 •••
Ive had some decent relationships online though, still friends with one person i met 7 years ago on discord.


Thats nice.

Edit post

#8 •••
Had a woman asking to be my sugar momma. Said no. Does that count? If so. Took 10 seconds.


No, that doesnt count because relationship didnt even start. But yeah, I get weird old women sending me weird messages too. I even had a woman who looked 60 stalking me and liking my videos on Tik Tok.

Edit post

#9 •••
@SergeantLynch
Yep, best way to avoid fluid transfer and microorganism exchange.


You say that like it's a bad thing?


If you don't thoroughly enjoy "fluid transfer and microorganism exchange", then you are doing it wrong.

Edit post

#10 •••
@Sidewalker

Yep, I suppose that nutritionists do keep telling us to improve our microbiome.



Edit post

#11 •••
@SergeantLynch

That is before you joking social media. After that it’s all AI driven.

Edit post

#12 •••
@SatanLucy
It lasted about 10 minutes. Basically some girl messaged me, strongly implied she wants relationship, we exchanged just a few messages, I asked her if she likes head pats and tickling, and she said yes to head pats and no to tickling, then out of nowhere she just blocks me and writes on her account that I cheated on her.



All that; several messages, with multiple people, over 10 minutes?


No, no relationship develops in 600 seconds. That stretches the meaning of "relationship" beyond credibility. A "relationship" is said to have 5 Cs: Communication, Commitment, Compassion, Compromise, Compatibility. These require much longer than 10 minutes to develop sufficient to call it "relationship." What you had was a sixth term, which is required for a relationship, but does not sufficiently define it: Contact.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#13 •••
@fauxlaw
Communication, Commitment, Compassion, Compromise, Compatibility.


I dont have compassion,, commitment, or ability to compromise. I also am not compatible with anyone. But I can communicate.

Edit post

#14 •••
@SatanLucy

You end up communicating only negative things about yourself because of your temperament.

Edit post

#15 •••
@Debby
You end up communicating only negative things about yourself because of your temperament.



It happens.

Edit post

#16 •••
@SatanLucy

"relationship" requires reciprocal C's, not just one-way.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#17 •••
@SatanLucy

Try showing more of your positive attributes.

Edit post

#18 •••
@Debby
Try showing more of your positive attributes.


Eh, not a big fan of faking long term.

Edit post

#19 •••
@fauxlaw
"relationship" requires reciprocal C's, not just one-way.


Cant give what I dont have.

Edit post

#20 •••

With that attitude, I'd have never purchased my first 1 oz. gold bar in 1970s..

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#21 •••
@Debby

Hmmmmm


Not sure of the relevance of your comment.


Please explain.

Edit post

#22 •••
@fauxlaw

I do buy gold too. However, I dont have commitment for girlfriend.

Edit post

#23 •••
@SergeantLynch
Hmmmmm

Not sure of the relevance of your comment.

Please explain.


Why on earth would you expect a relevant comment from Debby?


That would be unprecedented, maybe you should get over it.


BTW, it's not her fault, it's just the way she was programmed.


Edit post

#24 •••
@Sidewalker
Twelve-year-olds can be so fickle.


I am sure she wasnt 12, but you can never know who is on the other side in online relationships. It could easily be some creep or worse, a very unattractive person who deserves no love.

Edit post

#25 •••
@SatanLucy

You are a victim of social media.

Edit post

#26 •••
@Debby
You are a victim of social media.


If it wasnt for social media, I wouldnt even have a social life. I might as well be some taoist monk meditating on a mountain.

Edit post

#27 •••
@SatanLucy

Mountains are considered elemental Taoist symbols and sacred spaces, serving as pivots between the energies of Heaven and Earth. Taoist temples and monasteries were frequently built high in the mountains so that practitioners could gain wisdom from isolation and proximity to nature.

Edit post

#28 •••
@Debby

Maybe those taoist guys are smart.

Edit post

#29 •••
@Sidewalker

Hmmmmmm.


Programmed we are, for sure.

Edit post

#30 •••
@SatanLucy

Taoism does not focus on human-defined "smartness" as an end in itself

; rather, it emphasizes practical wisdom, natural intelligence, and a balanced approach to knowledge that transcends conventional intellect. 

Edit post