Women dont care for your intelligence or kindness - they want the lion who can chase away other lions

Started by SatanLucy

Replies
5
Posts
6
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••
🔗 Link

Many women will say they care about intelligence and kindness.


Alright, I will bring my IQ certificate to a first date to show my high IQ, and list of donations I made to show my kindness.


Of course, I will get instantly rejected, because women dont care for intelligence or kindness.


there is a reason why I didnt reproduce even with very high IQ and kindness, but many low IQ violent criminals in prisons did reproduce with no effort, IQ, or donations to charity:


~50% are Married: Around half of both male and female prisoners report being married or partnered, though many more are in intimate relationships.


Studies also show that high IQ is actually a disadvantage on average, low IQ people reproduce more.


"Yes, research consistently shows a small to moderate negative correlation between IQ (or cognitive ability) and fertility: people with lower IQs tend to have more children"


In other words, women dont seek intelligence or kindness.


Lets observe the nature. In nature, two male lions fight, and the lion who chases away other lion gets to be with female lion.


In other words, it is not the kind nor intelligent lion who reproduces, but the lion who makes other lions back away.


this is why women will often prefer men who are ready to fight for them against other men.


It has nothing to do with intelligence, kindness, or being nice. Women literally want to see you fight for them with insane obsession.


So high IQ person or kind person would naturally back off when woman goes to another man. And high IQ person would lose in that way instantly.


Low IQ man would try many things to break up woman's relationship with another man, or even to prevent it from happening in first place. He does not back away like high IQ person, he makes the other lion back away, exposes flaws of other man to her, appears as a superior choice to that other man.


So its not any form of kindness or intelligence, but it is just competition for woman, and the lion who backs away loses the competition.


Lets further explain the point. In my country, Bosnia, average IQ is 98. However, when we exclude people with 120 IQ and above, average IQ likely drops to 94 or below.


So group of people with average IQ of 94 is statistically more likely to reproduce than group of people with 120 IQ and above.


Now, if women cared for intelligence half as much as they claim to care, you would see the opposite effect. You would see those over 120 IQ being chased by women, while those of 94 IQ are left unwanted.


But we see exactly opposite of that. those with 120 IQ and over are considered unwanted nerds, bullied often, while people with 94 IQ seem to be the actually desirable ones.


So high IQ is a literal disadvantage for many reasons, because its not the smart person who reproduces, but the persistent obsessive lion who chases away other lions, is the one who reproduces.


And this is logically true. If you make other lions back away, female will have no choice but to be lonely or be with you.


this is what low IQ men do all the time. they let all other men know that that woman is theirs, so no one else approaches a woman. they display obsession which makes all other men think they will have problems if they approach that woman.


that is nature's law. Not intelligence, not kindness, not good personality, but personality which makes all other personalities back away while it claims the prize.

Edit comment

#2 •••
🔗 Link

Edit post

#3 •••
🔗 Link

Edit post

#4 •••
🔗 Link
@SatanLucy

Some factors for difference in lower reproduction in higher IQ people.

Demographic research has identified a 

small to moderate negative correlation between IQ and fertility rates, particularly in Western nations. 

Current trends and key findings from these studies include:

  1. Negative Correlation: Many studies report an overall negative correlation (approximately -0.17) between IQ and the number of children a person has. Research suggests that individuals with higher intelligence often delay marriage and reproduction longer than those with lower intelligence.
  2. Gender Differences: While more intelligent women and men both tend to want fewer children, data shows that only highly intelligent women are significantly more likely to remain childless by the end of their reproductive lives.
  3. Male Fertility Patterns: Some studies indicate a reversal of this trend for men. For instance, recent Norwegian data found that men in the top 20% of cognitive ability actually had more children on average (2.0) than those in the bottom 20% (1.8), despite starting their families later.
  4. Confounding Factors: Researchers debate whether the link is directly related to IQ. Factors such as socioeconomic status, educational attainment, and religiosity are strongly correlated with both IQ and fertility. When controlling for education and wealth, the independent effect of IQ on reproduction often reduces or disappears.
  5. Access to Contraception: Higher IQ couples are statistically more likely to use birth control consistently and effectively, and are more likely to seek medical termination for unplanned pregnancies.
  6. Impact on Future Generations: Some theorists express concern about "dysgenic fertility" (the idea that population IQ might decline), but the Flynn Effect—a historical rise in average IQ scores over generations—suggests that environmental improvements like better nutrition and education have historically counteracted these reproductive trends. 


Edit post

#5 •••
🔗 Link

I will not spend time on this on a holy day like Christmas Eve nor on Christmas Day.


I will say you are not correct due to the false dichotomy you created, however there is truth behind the lion-chaser concept you explained.


I will explain more later but leave you with one hierarchy I found is true for most women (again, you make the error of generalising all women):


  1. Alpha male hero type, genuinely intimidating but morally good consistently that scares off bullies without whining about retaliation, can endure being badmouthed by men and women alike without biting back harsh but still humbles people by sheer reputation and formidability = peak
  2. Guys who are tough to bully but also may be bystanders quite easily and/or be bullies to a select few (especially ones they demonise and justify as deserving victims)
  3. Bullies = beneath that no matter how 'alpha' or 'destroyer' they are.
  4. Victims that keep staying as victims and are morally good = offputting but tolerable, may 'grow on the woman' over time.
  5. Victims that are bland, neutral, hard to tell where they stand morally = less appealing.
  6. Victims that are evil in noticeable, blatant ways = repulsive to basically all women.

I won't justify it. I won't put more effort in until after Christmas day is fully over for the European timezones. Thanks.


For some women 4 can surpass 3.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#6 •••
🔗 Link

You listed points you found is true for most women (again, you make the error of generalising all women). Which is exactly what you are doing.

Edit post