Loki's Chaos - Why Machiavelli's "shut up and win" doesnt work against troll God (Example with trump)

Started by SatanLucy

Replies
24
Posts
25
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••

Machiavelli has for a long time taught principles of power, and one of main principles was strong silent type of "shut up and win".


the main principle was this: the more you talk, the more chance you have of saying something incorrect, and embarrassing or destroying yourself.


So shut up to eliminate chance of being wrong and self-destructive, and let others self-destruct instead.


the principle sounds reasonable, solid... until you face a troll God who knows exactly what he is doing.


You see, the problem with troll God is this, he doesnt care about being incorrect or embarrassed.


Because troll God understands that comparison is what actually counts, not mere words of one person.


Because Machiavelli rests on false assumption that if he stays silent, other person will self-destruct. But troll God does not self-destruct, he attacks your very reputation, and if you stay silent there, well, you are doomed.


the goal of troll God isnt to make himself look good, but to make everyone else look way worse.


And this is where Machiavelli's silence is actually Machiavelli's doom against troll God.


Lets take example of trump.


trump is not someone who is silent. In fact, he talks more than probably any other person on the planet.


So by Machiavelli's law, if he talks so much, he should have said something wrong which would cause him to fail.


But the problem in the law is, when you say great mass of things every day, you achieve 3 effects:

  1. You make it impossible for others to correct you, and if they even try, they end up looking more silly than you.
  2. You attack their reputation on all levels to make it literally impossible to defend. It would take more time to defend than it takes you to attack.
  3. You make many claims and many of those claims end up being what people agree with. One person may disagree with some of your claims, but ends up agreeing with other claims.



So troll God applies a strategy opposite of Machiavelli. He does not stay silent. He talks more than anyone else.


Result?


In 2024, trump's reputation was attacked. He was accused of many crimes and felonies. trump could have stayed silent, but he didnt. He didnt defend himself much, but instead he went for his opponent's reputation.


He attacked reputation of Biden's administration on all levels, made Biden administration look insane, heading for WW3 and economic collapse of USA, but also he made promises which promised to fix issues Biden caused.


Now, lets make a comparison:


  1. trump - accused of crime, says will end all wars in one day.
  2. Biden administration - Leading USA to WW3, economic collapse, led by clearly insane man


When we compare these 2, it doesnt take much brain to conclude that 2 is a lot worse than 1.


So troll God isnt someone who defends himself. He makes others look so bad that in the end, he is the only choice which seems least bad choice when comparison is made, and choosing others seems insane.


Because this isnt about "I am good, you are bad" nonsense strategy.


It is "You are way worse than me in comparison".


And this comparison is what makes even a bad person get elected because someone else was worse in comparison.


Result?


trump won 2024 easily, because he made his opponents look far worse than him.


Of course, his approval rating now is low because sadly, he has no one worse to compare himself with.


the problem with "You are way worse than me" strategy is that it only works in these conditions:

  1. When there are limited options and choice must be made
  2. When one choice is worse than other


Currently, 1 doesnt exist because no elections or choices or comparisons are made. It is just trump being valued as he is.


But it is not trump's words which caused his low approval rating, but his actions which are now getting worse because he is doing opposite of what he said he would do.


So troll God way of talking still works, and worked for trump twice to get elected. It is his actions which have terribly ruined his reputation, because when your actions dont match your words, people lose trust.

Edit comment

#2 •••

These are ai posts from you right?

Edit post

#3 •••
@SatanLucy

...

Edit post

#4 •••
@linate

No, I didnt use AI here.

Edit post

#5 •••
@SatanLucy

I didn't get through it all to see if it has the same logic structure as AI but I can say u have an impressive way of thinking outside of the box. Both when u r right and when u r full of shit

Edit post

#6 •••
@SatanLucy

I heard that the new Navy battleship that Trump is promoting is going to be called the USS BoneSpurs.

Edit post

#7 •••
@FLRW

I honestly dont know how trump became president twice. I think the second time, the democrats were setting him up for victory by doing everything wrong such as having black woman as their candidate, which isnt really popular in USA. I mean, woman president of USA? Never happened and never gonna happen.


there is higher chance for rapist to be president of USA than for a woman to be president of USA.

Edit post

#8 •••
@SatanLucy

That what what happened. there is higher chance for rapist to be president of USA than for a woman to be president of USA. Trump was re-elected president and Kamala Harrisa black woman was brushed aside.

Edit post

#9 •••

Machiavelli, like Nietzche, was a self-identfied loser in life that felt he knew why he'd lost and forned entire theories about it.


You will notice that neither Nietzche's stuff not Machavelli's tend to work as well as they sound at first glance.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#10 •••


Nietzsche's philosophy challenges traditional morality and religion, focusing on life-affirmation, self-overcoming (Übermensch), and creating one's own values in a meaningless world, famously declaring "God is dead" to signify the loss of objective truth and divine purpose. Key concepts include the Will to Power (drive for growth, mastery), Amor Fati (loving one's fate), and Eternal Recurrence (willing to live life infinitely). He urged individuals to become creators of meaning through continuous self-mastery and psychological strength, embracing suffering as a path to profound self-realization. 

Core Ideas

  1. Critique of Morality & Religion: Attacked traditional Judeo-Christian morality as life-denying, promoting resentment and weakness, arguing it stems from a rejection of earthly life.
  2. "God is Dead": Signifies the collapse of absolute religious and metaphysical foundations for morality, leaving humanity to create its own values.
  3. Will to Power (Wille zur Macht): The fundamental drive in all life, not just domination, but self-mastery, growth, and the overcoming of resistance.
  4. Übermensch (Overman): An ideal human who transcends conventional morality and creates their own values, achieving self-realization and affirming life.
  5. Amor Fati (Love of Fate): The highest affirmation of life, accepting and loving everything that happens, good and bad, as necessary.
  6. Eternal Recurrence: The thought experiment of living your life over and over again, testing if one can joyfully affirm every moment, including suffering.
  7. Perspectivism: The idea that there are no objective truths, only interpretations from different perspectives, challenging notions of a unified self or singular reality. 

Goal of His Philosophy

  1. To inspire individuals to overcome nihilism (the belief that life is meaningless) by embracing life's challenges, fostering creativity, and becoming "who you really are" through a process of self-overcoming and value creation. 


Edit post

#11 •••

The Nazis were heavily inspried by him.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#12 •••
You will notice that neither Nietzche's stuff not Machavelli's tend to work as well as they sound at first glance.


I actually tried few Machiavelli strategies, and some do work, but you cant rely on them alone or always. there are times when "shut up and win" works. there are times when absence builds power. there are times when you dont want to give woman attention. As I said, there are times. these strategies dont work always or in all situations, so to rely on them always is stupid and will actually cause harm in long run. Life is about comparison, and people often compare "with you vs. with someone else". Machiavelli would actually constantly lose in comparison against any person skilled in providing entertainment but also smart enough to not overdo it.

Edit post

#13 •••
@SatanLucy


Nietzsche's philosophy challenges traditional morality and religion, focusing on life-affirmation, self-overcoming (Übermensch), and creating one's own values in a meaningless world, famously declaring "God is dead" to signify the loss of objective truth and divine purpose. Key concepts include the Will to Power (drive for growth, mastery), Amor Fati (loving one's fate), and Eternal Recurrence (willing to live life infinitely). He urged individuals to become creators of meaning through continuous self-mastery and psychological strength, embracing suffering as a path to profound self-realization. 

Core Ideas

  1. Critique of Morality & Religion: Attacked traditional Judeo-Christian morality as life-denying, promoting resentment and weakness, arguing it stems from a rejection of earthly life.
  2. "God is Dead": Signifies the collapse of absolute religious and metaphysical foundations for morality, leaving humanity to create its own values.
  3. Will to Power (Wille zur Macht): The fundamental drive in all life, not just domination, but self-mastery, growth, and the overcoming of resistance.
  4. Übermensch (Overman): An ideal human who transcends conventional morality and creates their own values, achieving self-realization and affirming life.
  5. Amor Fati (Love of Fate): The highest affirmation of life, accepting and loving everything that happens, good and bad, as necessary.
  6. Eternal Recurrence: The thought experiment of living your life over and over again, testing if one can joyfully affirm every moment, including suffering.
  7. Perspectivism: The idea that there are no objective truths, only interpretations from different perspectives, challenging notions of a unified self or singular reality. 

Goal of His Philosophy

  1. To inspire individuals to overcome nihilism (the belief that life is meaningless) by embracing life's challenges, fostering creativity, and becoming "who you really are" through a process of self-overcoming and value creation. 


Edit post

#14 •••
@Debby

World could be "meaningless", but once you have a goal, it stops being arbitrary or meaningless.


When you have a goal (desired state of things), goal can only become achieved (become true) if you take objective steps needed to achieve it.


For example, if goal is to stop being thirsty, I objectively must drink water. Failure to do what is objectively necessary results in failure to achieve goal.

Edit post

#15 •••
@SatanLucy

You may be right.

This perspective aligns closely with 

existentialism, a philosophical framework that suggests while the universe has no inherent, objective meaning, individuals have the freedom and responsibility to create their own subjective meaning. 

Here is a breakdown of how this idea functions philosophically and psychologically:

The "Meaningless" World (Existential Nihilism)

  1. No Inherited Meaning: Existentialism posits that "existence precedes essence," meaning we are born first and must define our purpose later.
  2. The Absurd: Albert Camus described the "absurd" as the conflict between the human desire for meaning and the "silent" or indifferent universe that offers none.
  3. Freedom from Absurdity: While the world might seem chaotic or random, this lack of predefined purpose is viewed as liberating, because it places the power of meaning-making directly in human hands. 

Goals as a Catalyst for Meaning

  1. Subjective Purpose: Once a goal is established, it serves as a "compass" that guides decisions, actions, and reactions.
  2. The "Why" and the "How": As Friedrich Nietzsche famously noted, "He who has a Why to live for, can bear almost any How".
  3. Overcoming Nihilism: Creating goals acts as a buffer against despair or an "existential vacuum". 

The Role of Action

  1. Engaged Living: Viktor Frankl, author of Man's Search for Meaning, argued that meaning is not just thought, but experienced through engagement with the world.
  2. Creating Value: Goals do not need to be massive or world-changing; even simple, personal, or everyday aims—such as kindness, creating art, or building relationships—supply necessary significance.
  3. Defiance: By setting goals in a world that offers none, you are essentially rebelling against the "absurd," affirming your existence and agency. 

In essence, having a goal transforms existence from a passive, arbitrary experience into an active, intentional journey. 


Edit post

#16 •••
@Debby
No inherited meaning.


Genetic inheritance transfers and inspires meaning to the new unit.


Whereas thought, although a secondary attribute is meaningful in it's very nature.


The concept of nihilism, comes with it's own meaning, so is therefore a blatant contradiction.


And a Universe evolves...If it didn't, it wouldn't.


Philosophy...Good work if you can get it.


So, take the word Exist, stick on an ential and plonk an ism on the end...Bob's your Uncle and Aunt fanny's a philosopher.



Edit post

#17 •••
@SergeantLynch

Nihilism is a philosophical position that fundamentally rejects or denies generally accepted or fundamental aspects of human existence, such as objective truth, knowledge, morality, values, or meaning

. Derived from the Latin nihil ("nothing"), it posits that life is without objective purpose, value, or intrinsic meaning

While it often carries a connotation of pessimism or despair, it is more precisely understood as a "crisis of meaning" where established values devaluate themselves. 

Here are the key facets and variations of the concept:

Core Types of Nihilism

  1. Existential Nihilism: The most common form, which asserts that life has no intrinsic meaning or value, rendering human existence pointless.
  2. Moral/Ethical Nihilism: The view that there are no objective moral facts; therefore, nothing is inherently "good" or "evil".
  3. Epistemological Nihilism: The challenge to the existence of knowledge, arguing that we cannot attain true knowledge or that knowledge is impossible.
  4. Cosmic Nihilism: The view that the universe is vast, indifferent, and unintelligible, rendering human endeavors insignificant.
  5. Political Nihilism: A form that advocates for the destruction of all political, social, and religious institutions. 

Key Philosophical Perspectives

  1. Friedrich Nietzsche: Associated with the concept, Nietzsche viewed nihilism as a historical process where "the highest values devaluate themselves". He warned of the "death of God"—the collapse of Christian morality—and predicted the rise of nihilism in Western culture. He distinguished between passive nihilism (resignation) and active nihilism (a destructive force that clears the way for new values).
  2. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi: The first to coin the term, using it to criticize rationalism as leading to a denial of reality.
  3. Albert Camus & Jean-Paul Sartre: These existentialists explored nihilistic themes, but focused on the human responsibility to create meaning in a meaningless world. 

Common Misconceptions and Nuances

  1. Nihilism vs. Pessimism: Pessimists believe the world is inherently bad; nihilists believe it is inherently meaningless.
  2. Optimistic/Positive Nihilism: Some, such as "sunny nihilists," argue that the lack of inherent meaning is freeing, allowing individuals to create their own purpose unencumbered by societal pressure.
  3. Passive vs. Active: Passive nihilists may fall into depression or apathy, while active nihilists use the breakdown of meaning to forge new, personal values. 

The concept of nihilism is frequently discussed in contemporary culture as a reaction to the decline of traditional beliefs, the rise of scientific rationalism, and the challenges of modern technology. 


Edit post

#18 •••
@Debby

Why would nihilists discuss nihilism?

Edit post

#19 •••
@SergeantLynch

Nihilists discuss nihilism 

to explore life's inherent meaninglessness (existential nihilism), challenge objective morality (moral nihilism), question absolute truth (epistemological nihilism), or even to reject societal structures (political nihilism). They engage with it as a starting point for finding personal value (existentialism), critique existing beliefs, understand societal crises from weakened authorities (like religion), or simply to analyze the human condition and the absurd lack of inherent purpose. 

Reasons for discussing nihilism:

  1. To understand the human condition: Nihilism addresses fundamental questions about existence, purpose, and suffering, even if the conclusion is that there are no answers.
  2. As a catalyst for creating meaning: Philosophers like Nietzsche saw the collapse of traditional values (the "death of God") as a necessary step for humanity to create new, self-defined values, a path explored by existentialism.
  3. To critique society: Political nihilists aim to destroy existing social, religious, and political orders because they see them as meaningless constructs, viewing it as a form of liberation.
  4. To grapple with meaninglessness: Discussing nihilism helps individuals process feelings of disillusionment when traditional sources of meaning (like the "American Dream") fail, acknowledging the lack of inherent purpose.
  5. As a philosophical starting point: It's a framework for challenging assumptions and examining why we believe what we believe, moving beyond simple pessimism or apathy. 

Different forms and motivations:

  1. Existential Nihilism: Life lacks intrinsic meaning, motivating discussions about how to live in a purposeless world.
  2. Moral Nihilism: Rejects objective right and wrong, leading to discussions about ethics and responsibility.
  3. Epistemological Nihilism: Questions the possibility of truth, leading to debates about knowledge itself.
  4. Active vs. Passive: Some nihilists passively accept meaninglessness, while others actively question and challenge meaning-making systems. 


Edit post

#20 •••
@Debby

Nihilists with a purpose then.

Edit post

#21 •••
@SergeantLynch

Nihilists believe life has 

no objective purpose or inherent meaning, but this doesn't mean they lack subjective purpose; they often find freedom in creating their own values, embracing personal projects (like fighting poverty or environmentalism), pursuing happiness, or simply experiencing life, while acknowledging all these goals are self-defined and temporary. The core idea is that meaning isn't given, so one must make it, leading some to destructive impulses but others to profound personal liberation and agency. 

Edit post

#22 •••
@Debby

Yes, philosophical fantasy.

Edit post

#23 •••
@SergeantLynch

The complete story.

Nihilism as a theme in philosophical fantasy

 refers to a genre or narrative approach where the core philosophical conflict is the negation of meaning, value, and purpose within a magical or fictional world. It is commonly used in fantasy to challenge traditional tropes like prophecy, destiny, and the absolute distinction between good and evil. 

Key Aspects of Nihilism in Fantasy

  1. Challenging Tropes: Many fantasy stories depend on the idea of a "chosen hero" or "destiny." Nihilistic fantasy challenges this by presenting a world where actions do not matter and heroism cannot prevent death.
  2. Villain Motivation: Nihilism is often used as the justification for a villain’s destructive actions, where characters (e.g., Kefka from Final Fantasy) act because they believe nothing matters.
  3. The "Absurd" Universe: Often closely linked with existentialism, this subgenre explores the tension between humanity's desire for meaning and a universe that offers none.
  4. Examples:
  5. Joe Abercrombie’s First Law series: Explores bleak realism and subverts heroic tropes.
  6. George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire:Features characters dying unexpectedly regardless of their moral standing or destiny.
  7. R. Scott Bakker’s The Second Apocalypse:Often cited as a series where philosophy is the bedrock, featuring strong nihilistic elements. 

Types of Nihilism in Fiction

  1. Existential Nihilism: The belief that life has no intrinsic meaning.
  2. Moral Nihilism: The view that no actions are inherently right or wrong.
  3. Cosmic Nihilism: The perspective that the universe is indifferent or hostile to human life. 

While many fantasies are inherently anti-nihilistic due to their focus on order, justice, and magic, "nihilistic fantasy" uses these frameworks to explore the breakdown of meaning and morality. 


Edit post

#24 •••
@Debby

Yes, I can run with both cosmic and moral nihilism. They are simply the Yin or Yang of their opposites.


But not so easily with existential nihilism...As the opposite of life is death...I'm not sure Yin and Yang applies...The essence of life is it's own meaning...Intrinsic if you like.

Edit post

#25 •••
@SergeantLynch


Yin-Yang sees opposites (light/dark, active/passive) as interdependent, complementary, and essential for a balanced, dynamic whole (Tao), finding meaning in flow, while nihilism often sees meaninglessness, rejecting inherent purpose, though both acknowledge life's contradictions, but Yin-Yang embraces them as creative tension, whereas nihilism can lead to despair or a search for created meaning, differing fundamentally in their view of inherent value—Yin-Yang finds it in balance, nihilism denies it

Yin-Yang (Taoism)

  1. Core Idea: Balance and harmony through interdependence of opposites (Yin: passive, dark, feminine; Yang: active, light, masculine).
  2. View on Opposites: Not good vs. evil, but essential, dynamic forces (like day/night, rest/work) that create reality.
  3. Meaning: Found in embracing the natural flow, recognizing the inherent value in "emptiness" (Yin) and activity (Yang).
  4. Goal: Achieve balance (the "golden mean") between extremes. 

Nihilism

  1. Core Idea: Life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value.
  2. View on Opposites: Acknowledges contradictions but often sees them as highlighting the fundamental lack of ultimate meaning.
  3. Meaning: Often leads to existential despair, absurdism (finding meaning in the absurd), or creating subjective meaning.
  4. Goal: Varies; some reject meaning entirely, others find freedom in its absence. 

Key Differences

  1. Value: Yin-Yang affirms value in the dynamic interplay, while nihilism denies inherent value.
  2. Outcome: Yin-Yang promotes harmony and balance; nihilism often leads to questioning foundations, potentially to despair or radical freedom.
  3. Focus: Yin-Yang focuses on how things work (interdependence); nihilism focuses on if they matter (lack of purpose). 

A Point of Connection (Nietzsche's View)

  1. Nietzsche saw nihilism as the denial of the void by creating false morality (like Christianity), whereas the Tao (Yin-Yang) recognizes the void (emptiness) as foundational, suggesting a shared ground in acknowledging life's contradictions, but with different paths forward. 

Edit post