The Jews need to do better

This post neither understands the true state of affairs re:L Jews, US Statehood, Sovereignty of a nation, nor the languages of French, Hebrew, nor the religion of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Other than these flaws, it was a wasted read.

Elbows up assumes most people living in Canada identify as primarily Canadian. They do not. Canada 2026 is officially a global economic zone with no defined culture or border.

The Jews that run the media

I'm sure there are scummy media people who happen to be Jews, but why let scummy gentiles in the media off the hook? Plenty of non Jews do the things you're criticizing, so it seems inefficient to arbitrarily limit your criticism. Honestly, reading your post I'm confused why any of these give a reason to single out Jews, as you haven't even said they do any of this disproportionately.

The US should annex Canada without violence

How do you propose they accomplish this? This seems like a decision Canada would have to make as much as the US.

should the Jews face criticism over this

Which Jews? All of them? Just the ones in the media? I think what you're really criticizing is certain media personalities and politicians, some of whom aren't even Jewish, and your post does not do a clear job of specifying which of them you're talking about.

if the Jews are able to help the US successfully annex all of Canada

This is really vague. What counts as "the Jews" helping? Any country with Jews? Some Jewish soldiers?

Canada 2026 is officially a global economic zone with no defined culture or border.

The border is defined even if crossings aren't strongly enforced. For example, a drawing of a circle has a border even though it has no immigration enforcement. And it's theoretically possible for a country to have open borders even if there are severe economic reprecussions.

Jews aren't going to move to Canada, it's too cold. Give them like a chunk of Arizona or maybe Florida - not the good real estate, they can have like Lake Okeechobee or something. Swamp Jews, that'd be an interesting evolution to observe. They can have Palm Beach too because they basically already own that anyway.

Pictured: the infamous Swamp Jews of Landes on the hunt for Gifelte Fish, which they spear with their long, sharpened stilts. A people naturally adapted to the Everglades.

"Open borders" is one of those obvious oxymorons overused to the point where it's as meaningless as Canada's borders. For example, A circle drawn on white paper in black ink can have a theoretically defined border, but if you shade the entire paper the same color black, it's meaningless in all ways that matter.

Yes they could also simultaneously knit.

"Open borders" is one of those obvious oxymorons overused to the point where it's as meaningless as Canada's borders.

But it can indicate the area in which other laws are enforced. Or all laws, if the open borders are legal. Immigration enforcement isn't the only thing a government does.

Jewish women would choose to be left alone with a dozen bears over RemyBrown.

The Jewish women need to do deter. The Jewish men practice circumcision and exposing their backside to strengthen their faith. The women are left out even in the Bible.

So what you're criticizing, really, is the media. We could argue about to what extent Jews or non Jews have influence over it, but do the "Jews" you're criticizing include the ones who don't do the specific things you're criticizing? Or are you just criticizing some Jews (and presumably some non Jews as well)?

If you're argument is that Jews have disproportionate influence over some things, then clarify that explicitly. The vague generalities make it hard for me to tell what your point is.

Taking voting rights from women based on the bear thing seems like the same kind of overreaction as choosing the bear in the first place.

That's what I meant. I can say, "Republicans control the senate" without implying that every republican in the US is a senator.

Because the Senate runs strictly by majority rule. In the media, even a minority of the press can influence how people think.

But fine. If your argument is there are problems with the media and some people causing those problems are Jewish, then I suppose that's true to an extent, even though I wouldn't put it in quite the same terms.

It's not over reaction; it's a rights adjustment.

So making a dumb choice in a hypothetical situation is an overreaction but taking voting rights from half the population isn't?

I speak in generalities.

For the purpose of being inflammatory or because you think it's an effective way of communicating your ideas? Pretty much everyone else assumed you were criticizing all Jews collectively, and if I hadn't pressed you on your specific position, people still wouldn't know what you mean. Right now there's a trial going on and you're in danger of being banned because a lot of people are taking your inflammatory posts at face value.

It's not an issue of offensiveness to me, this style of post just doesn't lead to productive arguments. If you'd made a post with stats about Jewish influence in media, noted specific individuals responsible and talked about the correlation rather than just saying "Jews need to do better," I think a more productive conversation would have been had.

People are commonly poor estimators of the deadliness of certain animals. I don't think that should be a prereq for voting though. If you're going by intelligence why not just measure IQ or give a test?