RemyBrown wrote:
Anyone who posts online wants attention (including you).
No one is as pathetically desperate for attention as you,
Good observation!
RemyBrown wrote:
-> For me to mark him he'd have to post a slur or say something racist or something on that level.
He's said all the time that women are justified in choosing the bear over the strange man (so that's sexism).
If he said something like "the bear is better because men stink and are inferior to women" that would be explicit sexism. Otherwise, the sexism is at most inferred and that's not sufficient.
If he continues will there be a second vote on his banning?
Did he explicitly say men are assumed to want to rape women, or is that your interpretation of his words?
Incels (in his mind) want to rape women but don't because of the law.
Again did he explicitly say this? And if he said it about incels not all men then it's not enough to be bannable.
If you already know what he thinks of you why rage baiting him?
But you don’t know what I am going to say, whereas in the other example you are predicting his reply.
So you know you are in a more vulnerable situation. Try changing your behaviour.

WTF, so you searched soft?
Thanks for that mental image. 
Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens
If we were permanently banned tomorrow, I guess we would do something else rather than throw ourselves under a bus.
He wants to keep the subject of his rage baiting alive.
As do you perhaps by deliberately espousing theo-political misinformation.
Such is breakfastime entertainment though.
You find rage baiting entertaining?
Well I partake of DebateCraft simply because I enjoy doing so...If I didn't enjoy it, then I wouldn't bother.
And I regard provoking a response as a necessary prerequisite of the genre...Otherwise it would just be a pat on the back club.
"Rage bait" is just a silly modern synonym, designed to replicate itself.
RemyBrown wrote:
The difference between Lindsay Clancy and Jeffery Epstein is that Jeffery Epstein would never be sadistic enough to rape his own kids.
Clancy didn't rape her own kids either.
Epstein invited others to rape children on his island. Big difference. Trump was there too.