So, let be get this straight...

Started by Double_R

Replies
66
Posts
67
Page
3 / 3

Conversation

#61 •••
@fauxlaw
Oh, yes I have. The argument, from the beginning, has been the incorrect interpretation of the word "fight" in the context of the speech transcript.


You introduced that talking point yourself here. Neither myself or RR have made the word "fight" central to our arguments. RR mentioned the word once in the context of a much larger post. You have largely ignored our arguments in favor of focusing on small semantic matters and reductive platitudes.

Edit post

#62 •••
@Wryly


Your first post, @#30, in this string:


Why do Trump apologists continue to push this narrative that his rhetoric prior to 1/6 was peaceful?


Because, my friend, the actions taken by the DoJ prior to 1/6 were never addressed by any indictment of Trump, or anyone else in his former admin, but from 1/6, forward.


But, your own, first question in your post #30 in this staring denies a correct interpretation of the context by definition of Trump's use of one word: "Fight," in his 1/6 speech, which is not to be interpreted as as a violent suggestion.


Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#63 •••
@fauxlaw

handwave


I'll amend that to "his rhetoric surrounding 1/6" then.


You're continuing to focus on one word in his speech; I'm talking about the entirety of the speech, his tweets prior, his propaganda, the speeches of his compatriots, etc. The whole body of lies and provocation.

Edit post

#64 •••
@Wryly

Are you ignoring the news of today, that appears to render a different approach on what really happened in the 2020 election? As usual, history has its flaws when first noted, and that presence of flaw seems to have increased since 24-hour news cycles have matured, even from just 4 years ago. And, yes, one word in an entire speech of over 1 hour's length does have predominance when the subject is violence at the Capitol. Again, in spite of the left's take on it, not a single conviction of over 800 trials has resulted for "insurrection," yet the left continues to use that one word, for just a little longer than an hour speech. Try 4 YEARS, going on 5, my friend. Really, this "get Trump at any cost" has been gong on since the summer of 2014, when NBC fired Trump from "The Apprentice" when he announced he might run in the next presidential election. Who's propaganda and provocation carries a grudge?

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#65 •••
@fauxlaw

Trump won a second term and should be vindicated.

Edit post

#66 •••
@Wryly

Trump is not responsible for the speech of anyone else, so lose that criticism now. As for results of his 2nd term, we are in a better economy now than Biden ever had. If you're not participating in that yourself, that's your issue to resolve. Can't help you, there; a matter of personal investment.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#67 •••
@Debby

https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/debatecraft/posts/2e/public-moderation-log?page=1&comment_number=2

Edit post