I would prefer that we had not entered into this conflict with Iran,
But in terms of function, it is 'potentially fine.
I think a military and country can be made stronger by war,
We engage in a conflict, see our capabilities and our enemies capabilities.
By said conflict we are able to restructure our military to be more efficient.
From what I recall reading,
Many countries and America itself, found the military performance of the Union and the Confederacy embarrassing at the 'start.
But our military capabilities were improved by the conflict.
WW1 and WW2, led to 'great strides in military technology, tactics, and strategy.
There 'is the potential of America overstraining itself in conflict,
But same applies to exercising the body. Same applies for exercising the mind.
. . .
Iran recently killed a bunch of it's civilians for protesting,
At an uneducated glance, it doesn't seem to me that they had what it takes to effect a regime change.
I think it's 'unlikely we will achieve a regime change in the short term,
But America is killing a 'lot of leaders in Iran,
Potential exists for more favorable leaders to America, or infighting that weakens Iran.
Are we 'really going to get 'worse leaders for us in Iran, a country frequently shouting death to America the Great Satan?
(Shrug)
'Maybe, but they've 'already been using proxies, putting bounties on America soldiers before this current conflict.
Maybe change in Iran takes 10 or 20 years, (Shrug)
Took a while for USSR to fall after WW2.
Doesn't mean American efforts such as Berlin Blockade were without use.
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
'Potential downsides exist I admit,
If the draft got reintroduced, if this conflict drags on for years, if China takes Taiwan right now.
. . . But 'some roads, such as China moving for Taiwan, may be inevitable.
So should America be 'inactive or 'proactive?
Let 'others set the board?
(Shrug) Maybe Iran conflict is bad, maybe not.
Too early for me to tell.