Left wingers are hypocritical on p3do cancelling

God that makes so much sense now. It's fucking perfect. The little andrew tate wanna-be with daddy issues who can't seem to figure out why girls don't listen to him

My father is an alpha male, so I am like him. I am just not looking for relationships right now because I am pursuing a spiritual path of a warrior.

or talk to him so he spends all his time and money on AI girlfriends who are programmed to have to put up with him.

I dont spend money on AI girls. the apps are pretty much free. So you are wrong again.

This has comedy blockbuster written all over it.

the only thing thats comedy is how wrong you are. I am an alpha male. I am just hiding my powers for now.

Ad hommin.

Not really. I'm not making any kind of argument with that statement. I'm just making fun of you.

Well, Nirvana literally did that with a music album

Dude, if you honestly can't tell the difference between a band that lost mainstream relevance two decades ago and the current President of the United States of America, then there is no amount of logic that will get through your cranium.

Also, pick a better distraction target next time if you want to get attention off Trump. Not even Nirvana supports him.

My father is an alpha male, so I am like him.

LMAO. You said earlier your own dad doesn't even like you, and you say you're like him? That's some next level self-loathing.

I am just not looking for relationships right now because I am pursuing a spiritual path of a warrior.

I'M DYING I CAN'T LMFAO

IS THIS YOU?!

I dont spend money on AI girls. the apps are pretty much free.

Well ain't that peachy.

I am an alpha male. I am just hiding my powers for now.

Sure you are, Goku, now sit down and eat some Doritos before you sugar levels crash.

I'm just making fun of you.

We could make fun of you too. We are just holding back because you are a woman. (its sexism, you wouldnt understand).

LMAO. You said earlier your own dad doesn't even like you, and you say you're like him? That's some next level self-loathing.

My dad made me. I came out of his balls. Maybe he doesnt like me, and that is okay. I accept my fate as an unwanted offspring of alpha dominant male and I still have his characteristics.

IS THIS YOU?!

No, I dont study the blade. But I am a winner in all fields of life I apply my manliness to.

Sure you are, Goku, now sit down and eat some Doritos before you sugar levels crash.

I could literally have my own harem if I wanted to. But I dont want to.

We could make fun of you too. We are just holding back because you are a woman.

"Oh yeah! Well I could totally make fun of you too! I could make so much fun of you! You just couldn't handle it! You're weak and puny and I don't want to hurt your feelings because I'm such an alpha male."

1. SatanLucy, probably somewhere

"Oh yeah! Well I could totally make fun of you too! I could make so much fun of you! You just couldn't handle it! You're weak and puny and I don't want to hurt your feelings because I'm such an alpha male."

I am holding back because you are a woman. I could use my manly powers to seduce you or display my warrior aura, but I am saving energy for greater battles.

My dad made me. I came out of his balls. Maybe he doesnt like me, and that is okay. I accept my fate as an unwanted offspring of alpha dominant male and I still have his characteristics.

That's so sad. Here, let me pull out the world's smallest violin and I'll play "My Heart Bleeds For you".

But I am a winner in all fields of life I apply my manliness to.

Uh huh. Sure you are.

I could literally have my own harem if I wanted to. But I dont want to.

Yeah, that would require going outside and talking to physical people and that's scary. Much better to stay in the man-cave.

I am holding back because you are a woman. I could use my manly powers to seduce you or display my warrior aura, but I am saving energy for greater battles.

Bro you couldn't seduce a fifty year old hooker if you had ten grand in your hand. And I think displaying your "warrior aura" counts as indecent exposure in most states here in the US (and probably violates DebateCraft's ToU), so might wanna keep a leash on that one. I'm sure you have one handy, you sound like the kinda person who likes being taken on walks.

Actually, nah you probably don't like being taken on walks because, y'know, going outside. Probably like the idea of it, though.

Yeah, that would require going outside and talking to physical people and that's scary. Much better to stay in the man-cave.

I am not going to respond to your yapping. My warrior spirit cannot be shaken by woman's persistent disapproval. As for going outside, I dont need to go outside. the mountain doesnt need to move. Everyone admires the unmovable mountain.

My warrior spirit cannot be shaken by woman's persistent disapproval.

Oh really? Does disapproval get your warrior spirit going? That's probably why you wanna take a break in responding. Got something you need to take care of now.

I dont need to go outside. the mountain doesnt need to move. Everyone admires the unmovable mountain.

LMFAO. I mean there are some people who are into inflation, so I'm sure there's someone out there you can pay to admire your 'unmovable mountain'.

Does disapproval get your warrior spirit going?

Woman's disapproval doesnt affect me. All women will eventually be attracted to the unmovable object which I am.

I mean there are some people who are into inflation, so I'm sure there's someone out there you can pay to admire your 'unmovable mountain'.

the mountain does not pay people to come to it.

But anyway, it was fun entertaining you, yapping woman. I will retreat now to leave you wanting more.

the mountain does not pay people to come to it.

Ooooh that's right, your AI Girlfriend apps are free. Makes sense, at least this way you'll have "someone" to visit your "mountain" gag

I will retreat now'

Make sure to remember the tissues! And throw them away when you're done, ya filthy animal.

linate wrote:

The recurring themes in most of his posts are just terrible analogies taken to extremes

It'd be interesting if doctors of psychology would do a case study on remy's mind

False equivalences are the oxygen of the political right, and it really does speak to that psychological question; if all you have is “you too”, then you have to believe your side is bad as well. So what are you so fervently in support of?

I think many of these people, Remy included, just need to convince themselves that the rest of the world is bad in order to make themselves feel adequate.

if all you have is “you too”, then you have to believe your side is bad as well

Yeah, so both sides are bad so no reason to join the radical left.

1. People still listen to his music and will do so long after Trump is irrelevent.

2. Because "Nevermind" was too popular of an album.

So if Trump had just one image of child porn that you knew about, then would you cease to call Trump a p3do? If so, then you support p3dophillia if it's in small doses.

1. Irrelevant. Nirvana wasnt elected to be a representative of the American people. Nirvana doesn't go before other world leaders with this taint. Nirvana doesn't protect pedophiles from accountability by trying to bury the Epstein files. Nirvana hasn't been accused of sexual assault and rape of women and girls.

2. That's a baseless and irrelevant assertion. Popularity didnt dismiss the case - the facts did.

3. If you want to call the Nirvana album cover 'child porn', then you are admitting you find a picture naked 4 month old child to be sexually provocative. I dont share your opinion.

That being said, if Trump had child porn in his possession, he would still be a pedophile.

If you want to call the Nirvana album cover 'child porn', then you are admitting you find a picture naked 4 month old child to be sexually provocative

LOL Leftists are really gonna defend anything just to punch Trump. Now they think naked images of babies are okay. Weird.

Yeah, so both sides are bad so no reason to join the radical left.

”You too” wasn’t my argument, so nice try.

”You too” wasn’t my argument, so nice try.

It defeated your arguments for left wing.

SatanLucy wrote:

If you want to call the Nirvana album cover 'child porn', then you are admitting you find a picture naked 4 month old child to be sexually provocative

LOL Leftists are really gonna defend anything just to punch Trump. Now they think naked images of babies are okay. Weird.

This is a matter of Trump loyalists attacking anything they can in an attempt to diminish Trump's gross and numerous flaws.

Child pornography has a legal specific definition and the Nirvana album does not meet that criteria.

Child pornography has a legal specific definition and the Nirvana album does not meet that criteria.

So you support people posting naked images of children. Well, that's weird.

Tell me you dont understand the law without telling me...

Tell me you dont understand the law without telling me...

Whatever floats your boat.

It defeated your arguments

Just like how Trump won in 2020

Just like how Trump won in 2020

You mean in 2024. Yes.

For something to be considered child pornography, there necessarily must be a sexual component. The average person (as well as the law in this case) doesn't assign 'sexual' as a descriptor of a 4mo old child. Why do you?