No, pedophilia is 'a sexual interest in prebubescent children'. Again, there needs to be a sexual component and there isn't one.
Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens
Child pornography has a legal specific definition and the Nirvana album does not meet that criteria.
Of course it isn't, the problem here is that SatanLucy see's infants as sex objects, so to him, that makes the Nirvana album pornography, in his creepy little mind, the fact that he whacks off to the Nirvana album cover doesn't mean he is doing something wrong, it means Nirvana is doing something wrong, how sick is that?
You are talking to a guy who downloads circumcision videos as pornography.
Good luck trying to have a rational discussion with him.
His MO is to insist that you see infants sexually too, and no matter how you respond, he will simply declare that you see infants as sex objects. He gets off on it, along with getting off on watching circumcision videos, and Nirvana album covers, and declaring everyone else sees infants as sex objects too.
womp womp
Is it true you see infants as sex objects? Were you abused as a child that made you become a transgender?
How did that make you a sex object?