Left wingers are hypocritical on p3do cancelling

Started by RemyBrown

Replies
66
Posts
67
Page
3 / 3

Conversation

#61 •••
@SkepticalOne
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#62 •••
But they would designate that for p3dophillia.
No, pedophilia is 'a sexual interest in prebubescent children'. Again, there needs to be a sexual component and there isn't one.

Edit post

Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens

#63 •••
@SkepticalOne
Child pornography has a legal specific definition and the Nirvana album does not meet that criteria.


Of course it isn't, the problem here is that SatanLucy see's infants as sex objects, so to him, that makes the Nirvana album pornography, in his creepy little mind, the fact that he whacks off to the Nirvana album cover doesn't mean he is doing something wrong, it means Nirvana is doing something wrong, how sick is that?


You are talking to a guy who downloads circumcision videos as pornography.


Good luck trying to have a rational discussion with him.


His MO is to insist that you see infants sexually too, and no matter how you respond, he will simply declare that you see infants as sex objects. He gets off on it, along with getting off on watching circumcision videos, and Nirvana album covers, and declaring everyone else sees infants as sex objects too.





Edit post

#64 •••
@Sidewalker

womp womp

Edit post

#65 •••
@SatanLucy

Is it true you see infants as sex objects? Were you abused as a child that made you become a transgender?

Edit post

#66 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#67 •••
@SatanLucy

How did that make you a sex object?

Edit post