@Debby
Well by now I shouldn't have to keep telling you about "The Bible".
Nonetheless, immediate research gives me menstrual cups and South Korean cities.
Started by Misterio
Well by now I shouldn't have to keep telling you about "The Bible".
Nonetheless, immediate research gives me menstrual cups and South Korean cities.
The Bible should be read not eaten. Develop some reading habits.
Well, they generally just prop up the other books on the shelf.
But a few will read them avidly, but just overlook the fact that it said the same today as it did yesterday.
I read one many years ago and wasn't inspired to read it again...Got the gist, forgot most...Concluded that it was a naive creation and existence hypothesis woven into mythological tales of ancient Middle Eastern tribal culture...Which is exactly what it is.
Not forgetting that it was written hundreds of years later, by theo-politically indoctrinated Europeans...And read today by theo-politically indoctrinated Canadians and about 2.5 billion others.
But not Jews...D'oh...They have their own favourite book to read...When they are not fighting of course...Peace and love indeed.
Europeans did not write the Bible. They translated the original Hebrew and Greek bibles.
Nope, you've been misled by Catholic propaganda again.
Europeans undoubtedly spread the concept of theo-political Christianity, all based upon vague, hand me down, earlier Middle East folk myths.
Whereas "The Bible" was undoubtedly a wholly new middle and western European adaptation created in the second millennium AD.
The Bible is made up of the Old Testament and the NewTestament. The Old Testament was written before Jesus’s time. The New Testament is made up of the Gospels and Paul’s letters. They were published after Jesus’s death.
https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/religion/posts/10d/evidence-of-the-afterlife?comment_number=23
Proof of mediumships and afterlife in upcoming peer reviewed journal by highly respected scientist
Yes, all come together in "The Bible", which is a much later adaptation of said Middle Eastern tribal folk mythology, including a very naive creation and existence hypothesis supposedly put forward by a intoxicated old guy with altitude sickness.
It took 66 books and 40 different authors to create the Bible.
Nope, before someone invented the printing machine, it took one monk a very long time to write a book with a quill and ink...Probably paid a pittance by his RC Inc overlords.
You are talking about the final translation of the original bible into other languages from the original Hebrew and Greek versions.
I'm simply referring to the first "Bible", which was no doubt not the final translation.
Prior to the first bible there obviously wasn't a previous one.
I think that RC inc. had something called "The Codex" but I'm not sure if that came before or after "The Bible".
I'm guessing that you are "talking about" older scribblings of dubious authorship, that were compilations of hand me down Middle Eastern folk tales and myths.
The codex was complied in the 4th century as the complete New Testament written in Greek. It came after the original New Testament which was in circulation after Jesus’s death.
Well, further reading informs me that the "Codex Vaticanus" is a dubious mish mash of stuff based upon some unattributed Greek text from any where between 350 AD and 1400 AD....So impossible to pinpoint originality.
It is a version of the Greek translation of the Old and New Testament preserved at the Vatican.