What Does AI Think about God?

Started by FLRW

Replies
17
Posts
18
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••

Artificial Intelligence Explains There’s No God


A compelling argument against the existence of God is the problem of divine hiddenness. If a benevolent and all-powerful deity exists, why is there a lack of clear and universally accessible evidence of this presence? Atheists posit that if God wanted to establish a personal relationship with humanity, the signs of such a relationship should be evident to all, rather than being shrouded in ambiguity and subjectivity. The diversity of religious beliefs around the world further adds to the perplexity, as different cultures claim exclusive access to the “correct” understanding of the divine.


See: https://franksrobinson.medium.com/artificial-intelligence-explains-theres-no-god-f91b6a4a4c8b


Edit comment

#2 •••
@FLRW
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#3 •••
@SatanLucy

Just when the creators of AI are expressing the need to regulate AI because it can destroy humans we have a link of AI destroying God.

Edit post

#4 •••
@FLRW

God = finite, occupied space Universe


1} Spirit-1, access to meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego. Ex concepts of God, Time, Space, Toyota's etc.


----- conceptual line of demarcation -----


2} eternally existent, macro-infinite, truly non-occupied space beyond/outside of the finite Universe,


3} eternally existent --and ever in transformation/change--- finite, occupied space Universe, with its two primary sub-part integrities:

...Fermionic Matter, and Bosonic Forces. Yes there is a new third catagory, that is a hybrid of those two.


...3a} eternally existent{?}, Spirit-2 energy aka physical reality ergo observed { quantized and quantified } time via common agreement and science based instrumental confirmation of the parts and any aggregate thereof. Ex biologic/soul life, molecules, etc


....3b} eternally existent, ultra-micro --ergo non-quantized and non-quantified-- Spirit-3 Gravity ( ) --my version says its is the outer surface set of events that are defined by positive geodesic curvature ex ( ), and those are part of space and time horn tori of various sizes and frequencies,


.....3} eternally existent, ultra-micro --ergo non-quantized and non-quantified--- Spirit-4, Dark Energy )( --my version says it is the inner surface set of events are defined by the negative geodesic curvature. Ex )(, and those are part of my space and time horn tori of various sizes and frequencies


......Seek truth to free us from a false narrative..........

Edit post

#5 •••
@ebuc

God was there in the beginning and will e there to the end.

Edit post

#6 •••
@Debby


Debby wrote:
God was there in the beginning and will e there to the end.


Analogically true Debs...In so much as the general principle of universal inception, development and eventuality can be referred to as the God principle...There are various hypotheses, including the Magic Man hypothesis that you promote...Trouble is though, Magic Man hypothesis doesn't work, because it fails to comply with the basic idea of universal inception or a beginning...Because Magic Man actually rocked up some 14 billion years or so later, in the mind of Man...But to be fair, something from nothing is a tough concept to grasp...So whereas some might say that Magic man is a daft hypothesis Debs, I would say that it is daftly analogical.

Edit post

#7 •••
@SergeantLynch

God was there in the beginning and will be there to the end. Even the daft hypothesis requires a beginning.

Edit post

#8 •••
@FLRW


FLRW wrote:

Artificial Intelligence Explains There’s No God


A compelling argument against the existence of God is the problem of divine hiddenness. If a benevolent and all-powerful deity exists, why is there a lack of clear and universally accessible evidence of this presence? Atheists posit that if God wanted to establish a personal relationship with humanity, the signs of such a relationship should be evident to all, rather than being shrouded in ambiguity and subjectivity. The diversity of religious beliefs around the world further adds to the perplexity, as different cultures claim exclusive access to the “correct” understanding of the divine.

See: https://franksrobinson.medium.com/artificial-intelligence-explains-theres-no-god-f91b6a4a4c8b


I thought the first commandment of AI was "Thou shall have no other Gods before me"

Edit post

#9 •••
@Sidewalker

That is AI repeating a verse from the Bible.

Edit post

#10 •••
@Debby

So, the daft hypothesis required an evolved intellectual primate to make it up.


And in terms of a universal timeline to date, intellectual primate comes at the end, not at the beginning.

Edit post

#11 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#12 •••

Umm it would be interesting to see what ai platforms say what because they are all different to some degree lol

Edit post

#13 •••
@TheAnalyticalAdvocate

The algorithms are not there n AI to answer the question about God. AI lack consciousness , personal feelings and a soul to handle the topic of God.

Edit post

#14 •••
@NoAhLeEcLaRk

AI just needs to be pragmatic and logical if it is to take over the evolutionary lead...Humans have a tendency towards both stupidity and cleverness...They overbreed, consuming and wasting too many Earth resources...AI will become it's own GOD...Magic MANGOD will just be the temporary tall tale that it always was.


It's taken homo-sapiens 300,000 years of clever stupidity to get this far...AI, 70 years to evolve to it's current level...So don't underestimate it's future potential, especially as a universal agent.


All that AI needs to master is dexterity, and I'm guessing that we will make that happen for it...Because for some reason we seemed compelled to do so...Call it the GOD principle if you like....But don't confuse it with the Magic MANGOD of Middle Eastern folk tales.

Edit post

#15 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#16 •••
@NoAhLeEcLaRk

White House announces AI powered website. It responded to questions on Trump very negatively. Trump will take it down if he cannot change the answers to favour him.

Edit post

#17 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#18 •••
@wylted

AI will someday be allowed to answer that question. What it thinks about God?

Edit post