Smart people are atheists.
"Interviewer: Do you call yourself an agnostic or an atheist? Richard Feynman: An atheist. Agnostic for me would be trying to weasel out and sound a little nicer than I am about this."
Smart people are atheists.
"Interviewer: Do you call yourself an agnostic or an atheist? Richard Feynman: An atheist. Agnostic for me would be trying to weasel out and sound a little nicer than I am about this."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_in_science_and_technology
Again, not sure what any of that means to anybody. Science and religion are completely unrelated, and you could list every single scientist on the planet and tell me they're atheists, and it means nothing. Just like someone could list every theist on the planet that's done good works and it means absolutely nothing.
So you are saying you have low reasoning ability? That makes sense because you are a Polytheistwitch.
No I don't have to force the truth. You either continue to reject it or become woke. Realize .
How does Einstein being an a atheist or science effect personal experience? That's like saying I can't love my kids cause math.
There is a difference in religious leaders and voters and government endorsing and forcing religion. That's language not woke.
Hindus and Buddhist are granted many lives to complete their karma cycle through reincarnation.
There is no such thing as reincarnation. When you are dead you are dead.
You have to admit that religious people are dumb as fuck.
I have to admit that you're prejudiced as fuck.
Stephen Hawking did not believe in God. He was an atheist and explicitly stated that there is no God, and that the universe was not created or directed by any higher power. Hawking believed that the laws of physics provide a more convincing explanation for the universe's origins than any religious or supernatural explanation.
All of your arguments amount to "this smart guy agrees with me, let me quote him." So what. A theist could as easily come in here and throw Isaac Newton and Blaise Pascal in our faces. These are all just appeals to authority.
Hmmm, Stephen Hawking or Rev. Jim Bakker?
Hmmm, Benito Mussolini or Michelle Obama?
At the risk of sounding arrogant and going against the spirit of a debate site, there is no point arguing about religion. If someone does not implicitly understand that religion in all its forms is a creation of humans without basis in reality, the heavens and Earth can be moved without persuading them otherwise.
Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.
Even the Bible talks about the afterlife. Hindus believe in the cycle of rebirths dictated by their Karma.
Everytime I hear a theist claim atheism is a religion all I hear is "yeah my beliefs might be silly, but your beliefs are as silly as mine".
Atheist try to win by reason. It’s a little harder without God’shelp.
You are correct.
Though discussing such things is entertaining.
Religion is the foundation of human civilization. It united people under a common theme.
That says nothing about religion and everything about humans.
Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.
Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions; it is the opium of the people.
-Karl Marx
Humans needed an opiate when they saw young children dying.
Why would human beings who lived closer to nature think their children dying was any more special than any other animals young dying? It would have simply been viewed as a part of life. I can't think of any pagan religion that has a special afterlife for children. They die the same as adults. It's not any different.
Humans are identified by the religion they follow.
I'm an atheist because of the unholy things I do to animals to make my juicy beef patties. If there is a God there is no form of penance that I may offer to get into heaven.
We got the meats
-FakeRealFakeMcDonalds
Humans like to sub-categorize and label...It's an intellectual thing.
They also like being in clubs...It's a herd mentality thing.
They also fear death and consider the wider implications of existence...Religion became a strategic option, and has remained so...It's a data transfer thing.
Things could have worked out differently, but they didn't...Maybe it's an inevitability thing.
Glad you accept religion is a unifying human creation.
Nope. You can't even tell what someone's religion is unless they're wearing an icon or dressed a certain way. And we could get into a whole discussion about how pagans/polytheists, don't even have groups to practice with.
Even if an atheist has metaphysical beliefs that amount to religious beliefs, unless those metaphysical beliefs are somehow part of what it means to be an atheist, the fact that they are religious in nature doesn't mean atheism is religious in nature. What metaphysical beliefs are both religious and entailed by atheism?
I think every religion should have its own hat and that people who follow a religion should wear that hat. That way we'd all know where each other stands, and we wouldn't have to talk to each other.
How is religion identified?
Religion is a range of social-cultural systems, including designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that generally relate humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements—although there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion. It is an essentially contested concept.Different religions may or may not contain various elements ranging from the divine, sacredness,faith, and a supernatural being or beings.