It’s more like filled in the blanks where an explanation was needed.
It’s more like filled in the blanks where an explanation was needed.
Debby wrote:The scribes made corrections when they thought they had come across something that was incomplete or missing details which they tried to fill in.
Stephen wrote: Made it up as they went along then, eh bible thicky?
Debby wrote: It’s more like filled in the blanks where an explanation was needed.
Indeed to suite their own agenda
Bart Ehrman admitted the scribes made small errors when copying the Bible for distribution. That was not what affected his faith. He lost his faith because he questioned God’s actions, holding Gods to his own low standard. He is not considered a scholar in faith.
Right or wrong choice then Bart?
But right enough...If we are to question Jeffrey Epstein, then why should we not question Goddo's rape of a minor?
Religion is not your subject of interest. Sperm donation or masturbation is your primary occupation. Stay with it.
She's gone masturbation crazy.
Are you running out of sperm to satisfy your wife? How are the rest of your organs doing?
We're 66, sperm is of little importance these days.
So you donate them as a sperm producer. What details do you provide so people can trust your sperm, like your genetics and health?
It's free to anyone that wants it, as long as they're prepared to get it themselves...Why?...Are you interested?
How do they get it themselves? Do they have to masturbate you?
Calm down Debs.
We don't want the moderators on your case again.
Let's stick to the question of choice.
It comes back to whether you made the wrong or right choice?
Yes, choice...Choice is one of those philosophical conundrums...Unless we are choosing between two things that are exactly the same then our selection is probably a foregone conclusion.
What choices do you give them to make the transaction go smooth.
Give who?...And what is the transaction?
The transaction is you being the donor. The recipient is anyone interested in your bodily fluid.