If all religions are true it means they're all false 100% sure absolutely and this wokeness has to end.

Matthew 7:1

Judge not, that ye be not judged.

John 14:2

In my Father's house are many mansions: if [it were] not [so], I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

Luke 17:21

Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

1 Corinthians 7:7

For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.

Is that true or are ideologies that say that is all wrong, true?

Is that true or are ideologies that say that is all wrong, true?

It's the Bible that says that.

You should try reading it; it's a good book.

Is it true? Can things against it also be true at the same time?

There is no perfect book in existence, but what is truth anywhere, including within the Bible, is truth, period. Truth can be found anywhere, it merely needs to be uncovered, cleaned of debris, and allowed to shine. Truth is the "more" in Madison's Preamble to the Constitution claim, the achievement of "...a more perfect union."

Then Bible cannot be the infallible word of God to you andnyuur source of.truth is entirely outside it even if some truth ends up inside it.

Truth is that which is known to be factually correct.

The opposite of truth can be classified variously...The Bible falls into this broad category, wherein some elements may be based upon real people and places.

Though a great deal of the bible was concocted some time later, and amounts to nothing more than the ideological and fanciful ramblings of ignorant men...Such is not truth.

Persistent formative conditioning and data transfer is what it is...And the meaning of/reasons for/ purpose of material creation and existence, remains a mystery.

Then Bible cannot be the infallible word of God

That is correct, mainly because God, Himself, wrote nary a word of it, and more particularly did not translate from original documents, not written by God, into the variety of languages in which it exists, today, and particularly when virtually none f those languages shares a lexicon [word list] with another language, which onlthe would have been able to accomplish infallibly.

Since God did none of these things, the HolyBible, though containing valuable information, is not, in its present form, infallible.

Fortunately, God has provided the means to discover what should have been said therein. Ask Him. James 1 [the entire chapter] describes the process, which must be followed without variation. Doubt will accomplish nothing. Skepticism will accomplish nothing,

Then Bible cannot be the infallible word of God to you andnyuur source of.truth is entirely outside it even if some truth ends up inside it.

The Bible was written over a period of more than 1,500 years, by over 40 different authors in three different languages, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek. The 40 authors lived in multiple different cultures, across three continents, spanning over a dozen different modern countries, and came from all walks of life: shepherds, farmers, tentmakers, physicians, fishermen, priests, philosophers and kings.

As far as what most would consider the most important part, the words and teachings of Jesus, the original texts were translations from spoken Aramaic into written Koine Greek over 40 years later.

Aramaic, Hebrew, Koine Greek, Latin and English is a rough approximation of the journey that had to be taken to arrive at an English translation of the Bible. All of these languages use different words, syntax and grammatical structures. Translation from one language to another always results in an inexact interpretation of words, meanings, and context. Even within a single language, words are very inexact, ambiguous and equivocal and they can have multiple meanings or different meanings to different people.

Given that these are the facts about the Bible, how on Earth can it be the infallible word of God? How exactly would that happen?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Well, an Omnigod would provide us with an infallible edition.

Like, displayed on a giant space screen in multiple languages and heard through giant space speakers...So that more than just a handful of Middle Eastern semi desert dwellers got to hear about it...Perhaps with a humming accompaniment.

Like, for sure do not covet thy neighbours wife's ass, but do fuck virginal girls in stables whilst their daft boyfriends are sorting out the donkey...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

None of this burning bush nonsense.

But of course, we know that the "Bible" is manmade and that an Omnigod has never actually uttered a word...Because there is no such thing.

Maybe an evolved super-intelligence...Maybe digital...Perhaps a vibration...Perhaps a subliminal hum.

You can end all this wokeness by accepting what the Bible says about Jesus as true. The Bible has stood the test of time.

Polytheism says lots of gods exist. None have to negate another.

The Bible has never been tested...It's just a later European rehash of 1st and 2nd century folk tales in mythological form...To accept as true, is to accept that all internal derived fantasy is externally true.

So Debs, where do I go to find Hobbits.

The Bible is the history of the Jews and their struggles with their God. You won’t find hobbits in the Bible.

Yes for sure, the European "bible" compiled in the second millennium AD, is a rehashed compilation of an older mythology...And for sure, might contain some fact but will also contain a lot of fiction and fantasy... And yes, worrying about a hypothetical GOD was perhaps something of a nuisance for semi nomadic tribal desert folk.

The European Bible is the translation of the Hebrew, Greek bibles that existed before the English translation.

Bible is and English word.

And "The Bible" is indeed an anglicised adaptation of older collections of Middle Eastern based myths and legends.

The Bible did not adapt the Europeans adapted to a Middle Eastern religion.

Yes, Europeans in the main were forced to adapt to alternative fantasy ideology.

Whereas "The Bible" is a wholly European adaptation of acquired Middle Eastern folk tales.

As you see, adapt is adaptable.

The Europeans established Christianity as a universal religion. Starting with the council of Nicaea.

Yes, my point entirely.

But the facts were already established in the Bible. This made the spread of it even easier then.

Nope, why do I have to keep reminding you... "The Bible" wasn't made up until the second millennium AD.

"The Bible" was/is a commercial theo-political propaganda method of mass subjugation.

Give us your money or we won't ask GODDO to let you into heaven.

The Bible was written between roughly the 8 BCE and the late 2nd century CE.andThe complete official collection was compiled by the late 4th century CE. It was written as a history of the Jewish people and their struggles with their God. Till it was accepted as our struggles too with God.

Nope, it's pretty simple Debs..."The Bible" is a much later Middle European construct...The clue is in the words "The Bible".

The disciples who wrote the gospels were Jews following Jesus.

Nope, J's mates probably didn't write anything...Like I stated, evidence is a tad thin on the ground...Whereas later supposition if rife.

The Gospels are named after the authors who wrote them. Mark, Luke, Matthew and John. They were Jesus’s disciples at that time.

As I said, there is no evidence to prove that these guys authored anything...Most was authored by people unknown, long after J's execution.

Rehashed hand me down tales are far from gospel...You will believe anything necessary Debs, to justify your decision to do so...Such is a hobby I suppose.