Why Are We Here? Why Must We Die?

Started by linate

Replies
32
Posts
33
Page
1 / 2

Conversation

#1 •••


# Why Are We Here? Why Must We Die?


*"Life is the arena where faith, love, and free will become real. Death and suffering are not good in themselves, but they create the conditions in which the deepest forms of love, trust, courage, and dependence on God can emerge."*


Why are we on earth?


Why do we suffer?


Why must we die?


These questions have accompanied humanity throughout history. Philosophers have wrestled with them, religions have built entire worldviews around them, and every person eventually confronts them in moments of grief, illness, loss, and mortality.


Modern society often offers two unsatisfying answers. One is that life has no ultimate purpose and that consciousness is merely a temporary accident of matter. The other is that the purpose of life is to maximize pleasure, comfort, wealth, or achievement.


Yet neither answer seems adequate to the deepest experiences of the human heart.


The moments we cherish most are rarely moments of comfort alone. They are moments of love, sacrifice, courage, forgiveness, wonder, meaning, and transcendence. We admire not merely the successful but the faithful. Not merely the powerful but the compassionate. Not merely those who avoid suffering but those who endure it with grace.


Perhaps this points toward a deeper truth.


Perhaps life is not primarily about comfort.


Perhaps it is about transformation.


## We Are Called Not Merely to Exist, but to Become


One of the most profound insights of Christianity is that God desires not slaves, pets, or robots, but children capable of freely participating in divine love.


Love cannot be forced.


A robot can obey perfectly but cannot love.


Love requires freedom.


Freedom requires choice.


Choice requires alternatives.


And alternatives create the possibility of suffering, failure, sacrifice, and loss.


The Christian tradition teaches that humanity was created in the image of God but not yet fully united with God. We are called not merely to exist but to become.


This theme runs deeply through the early Church. Irenaeus described humanity as being created immature, destined to grow into spiritual maturity through relationship with God. Athanasius spoke of humanity's participation in the divine life. Maximus the Confessor envisioned creation itself as moving toward union with God.


The Orthodox tradition calls this process *theosis*—the gradual transformation of the human person into deeper communion with God through grace.


This vision differs from a purely legal understanding of salvation. The goal is not merely to be declared righteous. The goal is to become righteous. Not merely to be forgiven, but to be transformed.


Earth, therefore, is not primarily a courtroom.


It is a school.


A workshop.


A hospital.


A training ground for eternity.


## Why Suffering Exists


This raises the most difficult question of all.


If God is good, why does suffering exist?


Christianity does not teach that suffering is good in itself. Disease, violence, grief, injustice, and death are tragic realities.


Yet Christianity does teach that God can bring good out of suffering.


In the Gospel of John, Jesus rejects the assumption that a man was born blind because of his own sin or the sin of his parents. Instead, he teaches that God's works would be revealed through the man's healing. Christianity does not always explain suffering by identifying a cause. Sometimes it points toward a future redemption.


This perspective suggests that suffering is not always punishment. Sometimes it becomes the arena in which faith, hope, courage, compassion, and trust are formed.


Certain virtues can only emerge in a world where suffering is possible.


Courage requires danger.


Forgiveness requires injury.


Compassion requires suffering.


Faith requires uncertainty.


Perseverance requires struggle.


Sacrifice requires cost.


Without the possibility of loss, these virtues become abstractions rather than realities.


The cross stands at the center of Christianity precisely because Christ does not bypass suffering. He enters into it.


The pattern of Christian life is not avoidance of suffering but transformation through it.


## The Science of Happiness and the Wisdom of the Saints


Interestingly, modern psychology has increasingly rediscovered truths that spiritual traditions have taught for centuries.


Researchers consistently find that lasting well-being is not primarily derived from pleasure, wealth, or status.


Beyond basic needs, happiness correlates much more strongly with:


* Meaning

* Relationships

* Gratitude

* Service

* Purpose

* Forgiveness

* Community

* Spirituality


Psychologists often distinguish between *hedonic happiness* and *eudaimonic happiness*.


Hedonic happiness concerns pleasure and comfort.


Eudaimonic happiness concerns meaning, virtue, growth, purpose, and fulfillment.


Again and again, studies suggest that people who orient their lives around meaning report deeper and more enduring satisfaction than those who pursue pleasure alone.


This mirrors the teachings of Christ.


"Whoever seeks to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it."


The paradox is striking. Happiness often arrives indirectly. The people most obsessed with happiness frequently fail to find it. Those who devote themselves to love, service, purpose, and meaning often discover happiness as a byproduct.


The saints understood this long before psychologists began measuring it.


## The Witness of Near-Death Experiences


Near-death experiences introduce another fascinating dimension to this discussion.


Interpretations vary, and caution is warranted. Yet researchers have documented remarkable consistencies across thousands of reports from different cultures and backgrounds.


People frequently describe:


* Profound love

* A sense of interconnectedness

* Life reviews emphasizing the impact of their actions on others

* Reduced fear of death

* Increased compassion

* Reduced materialism

* Greater spiritual awareness


Perhaps the most striking feature is the life review.


Many experiencers report reliving not only their own actions but also their effects upon others. Acts of kindness, cruelty, generosity, neglect, love, and indifference are experienced with startling clarity.


Whether one interprets these reports spiritually, psychologically, or some combination of both, their message is remarkably consistent.


What mattered most was not status.


Not wealth.


Not achievement.


Not power.


What mattered most was love.


Again and again, experiencers describe discovering that the deepest significance of life lies in how they treated other people.


This resonates profoundly with Christian teaching.


Christ summarized the law as love of God and love of neighbor.


The Apostle Paul declared that faith, hope, and love remain, but the greatest of these is love.


The convergence is difficult to ignore.


Ancient spiritual wisdom, modern happiness research, and many near-death experiences all point toward the possibility that reality itself may be oriented around love.


## The Desert Fathers and the Inner Battle


The Desert Fathers understood that the greatest battlefield is often not external but internal.


Retreating into the deserts of Egypt, Syria, and Palestine, they confronted the passions that distort human freedom.


Pride.


Anger.


Greed.


Fear.


Vanity.


Attachment.


Their goal was not self-hatred but purification.


They recognized that true freedom is not the ability to do whatever one wants.


True freedom is becoming the kind of person capable of choosing what is good.


Many modern people spend enormous energy attempting to control the external world while neglecting the internal one.


The Desert Fathers reversed this priority.


Their wisdom remains surprisingly relevant. The greatest obstacles to peace are often not external circumstances but the disordered desires and fears within ourselves.


## Thomas Merton and the True Self


Centuries later, Thomas Merton expressed similar insights in language accessible to the modern world.


Merton distinguished between the false self and the true self.


The false self is constructed from ego, achievement, social approval, comparison, fear, and status.


The true self is rooted in God.


Much of human suffering arises because we spend years constructing and defending an identity that was never our deepest reality.


We chase success, recognition, possessions, and validation while remaining strangers to our true selves.


Merton believed that spiritual growth involves the gradual surrender of the false self and the discovery of the true self hidden in Christ.


This vision closely parallels both the Desert Fathers and the Eastern Christian understanding of the image of God within every person.


## Why We Must Die


Death remains humanity's deepest mystery.


Yet perhaps death serves a role that earthly life alone cannot accomplish.


As long as we imagine ourselves self-sufficient, we may never fully recognize our dependence upon God.


Death exposes the limits of every earthly achievement.


Eventually wealth cannot save us.


Intelligence cannot save us.


Status cannot save us.


Even health cannot save us.


Death forces us to confront the deepest questions.


Who am I?


Why am I here?


What endures?


What is ultimately real?


Christianity answers these questions not merely with a philosophy but with a person.


Christ.


Humanity's encounter with sin and death creates the possibility of a relationship with Christ that could not otherwise exist.


We can admire a teacher without needing salvation.


We can appreciate wisdom without depending upon it.


But when confronted with our mortality, our limitations, and our need for redemption, Christ becomes not merely a teacher but a healer, redeemer, and savior.


In this sense, death is not simply an ending.


It is the final surrender of the illusion of self-sufficiency.


The resurrection proclaims that death is not the destination but the doorway.


## A Vision of Human Existence


When the insights of Christian spirituality, Eastern theology, happiness research, philosophy, and near-death studies are viewed together, a coherent picture begins to emerge.


Human beings appear uniquely oriented toward love, meaning, relationship, growth, and transcendence.


The deepest forms of happiness arise not through acquisition but through self-giving.


The greatest spiritual traditions emphasize transformation more than comfort.


Near-death experiences repeatedly point toward the centrality of love.


The saints speak of purification, healing, and union with God.


All of these perspectives converge upon a common insight:


We are not merely created good.


We are invited to become good.


Perhaps life is neither a meaningless accident nor merely a test.


Perhaps it is a process of becoming.


A journey in which faith, love, and free will are gradually woven together.


A school in which souls learn to love.


A workshop in which character is forged.


A hospital in which hearts are healed.


A pilgrimage toward union with God.


If so, then suffering, loss, and death are not accidental obstacles to learning love.


They are among the very conditions that make its deepest forms possible.


The purpose of life is to freely learn love.


The arena in which that learning occurs is a world marked by faith, sacrifice, suffering, and mortality.


And the destiny of that love is union with God.

Edit comment

#2 •••
@linate

Why indeed.


And no amount of sentimental verbiage will appease our ignorance.

Edit post

#3 •••
@linate

The Draconian doesn't die. He transforms into a Dragon and flies to the stars.

Edit post

#4 •••
@linate

The real creator and the admins of this simulation have several reasons our individual simulation character was generated and placed in the timeline.


Those reasons are nearly entirely outside of our purview just as Super Mario cannot grasp why people enjoy playing Nintendo games with him as their slave character (ironic as NPC would refer to the others but he is more what we mean an NPC is).


Largely obvious is the creators made Patriarchy common amongst dominant species and societies and made Matriarchy high in bottom-of-the-food-chain (insects etc) and we can see in front of us the deterioration of the feminist West both morally and literally (extinction, being replaced in all senses).


The Simulation is geared towards some absolutes; those that possess or admire masculine dominamce, those that are cunning and/or patient and more clear cut gears with others wavy/grey area.


One needs to observe the world around them and feel within them what naturally comes forth. Searching outside and at scriptures can work but cannot fully unlock truth until you weigh it against what is within as given truth. Each of us is with the simulation together. We are all here to fight, conquer and as a bonus maybe feel good doing it (the big O is not the only way we can feel good).


Thats what it is. Nothing else to it.


Decide carefully though. A villain and hero are both entertaining for the simulators, a pussy boy bystander disgusts them in the long run. Pick a lane, stick at it. Evil vs Good. All religions recognise this sacred war. Pick the side. Be disciplined.


The enemies are all around us, even on this thread.


Be vigilant.


Thats what is is my boy. ✊🤫

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#5 •••

What im noticing is that im spitting the deepest mysteries of the universe here, reconciling the Bible, nde science, classic philosophy, and basic science of the humanities... yet everyone responding isn't being fully awakened to these deepest truths, they're filtering it based on their preconceived views of the world.

Edit post

#6 •••
@linate

no my friend, you are the one enslaved to your preconceived views.


For instance you said the only 2 options the world offers are pure nihilism or pure hedonism. This is due to your preconceived notion that Christianity itself is not hedonistic and merely replaced the 'pleasure' to orient around Christ, love (which is not real love by the way) and other things.


Christian love is firstly very prone to bigotry, the most severe being antisemitism. The severe antisemitism it's prone to actually stems from these verses (I must clarify further to de-brainwash you from thinking this religion is true, it's a very problematic thing to believe I am not advocating believing in this).


23 “Why? What crime has he committed?” asked Pilate.
But they shouted all the louder, “Crucify him!”
24 When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “It is your responsibility!”
25 All the people answered, “His blood is on us and on our children!”
26 Then he released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified.

biblegateway


These verses from a so-called loving, forgiving religion were used to justify towards 2 milennia of antisemitism amongst Christians.


This began as ancient as the fact that it was Christians (not at all Muslims who actually have a more Zionist scripture than the New Testament, ironically) that dubbed Judea (a vast region that was then Israel fully) Syria Palaestina. This was an intentional antisemitic jab at the Jews of the time because the naming was after Phillistines, noted in the Torah as essentially the single most formidable Pagan, uncircumcised ethnos that the Jews ever faced against.


Now, let me show you another way that this is not love at all. If your father raped you, beat you, abused you and more, do you know what your texts say?


Let's start with Old Testament.


18 “If a man has a stubborn, rebellious son who will not obey what his father or mother says, and even after they discipline him he still refuses to pay attention to them; 
19 then his father and mother are to take hold of him and bring him out to the leaders of his town, at the gate of that place,
 20 and say to the leaders of his town, ‘This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he doesn’t pay attention to us, lives wildly, gets drunk.’ 
21 Then all the men of his town are to stone him to death; in this way you will put an end to such wickedness among you, and all Isra’el will hear about it and be afraid.

Bible Gateway


Before you say 'but that's the old testament' (which makes no sense because it is meant to be the literal same God of the new.


I will show you 2 things Jesus says that begin to not add up at all to a shift away from this.


The Tradition of the Elders

15 Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, “Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat.” He answered them, “And why do you transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him surely die. But you say, ‘If any one tells his father or his mother, What you would have gained from me is given to God,[a] he need not honor his father.’[b] So, for the sake of your tradition, you have made void the word[c] of God. You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said:


This is a cute mistranslation done by Catholic writers for that specific text as they of course didn't want to translate what is obviously what he really said.


Let's look at them correcting themselves in a later more modern translation:


He answered them, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? For God said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and ‘Whoever curses his father or mother shall be put to death.’


Your so called all loving deity spoke this way (or got lied about speaking this way). I want you to realise that if he's the same God the Father is, then he literally told Israelites to stone to death disobedient sons (daughters were only kept alive as they can bear young). This is really how he worked, this is truly how he functioned as a supposed deity.


Is it any wonder the Muslims and their Allah are so ruthless about things when they claim to serve the same one as the old Jews did? Really you have a wrong idea of reality and God.


You must struggle against evil yourself. you must be saved by your works first and God's assistance second.


What Christianity does it gaslight you into a state of helplessness. You become pathetic.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#7 •••
A villain and hero are both entertaining


Hero would sacrifice what he loves to save the world.


A villain would sacrifice the world to save what he loves.


I picked the right character to play.

Edit post

#8 •••

you didn't sacrifice shit for the people you love as far as I've seen.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#9 •••
you didn't sacrifice shit for the people you love as far as I've seen.


true

Edit post

#10 •••

Edit post

#11 •••

yeah we've met before, you pretended you weren't nasty to me while continuously telling me i'll die childless, wifeless and spent most of the rest of any interactions we had recently racially attacking all south asians.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#12 •••
you pretended you weren't nasty to me


At least you were nice to me anyway, so I learned to be a better person.

Edit post

#13 •••

Did those nice to you in life motivate you to be the degenerate leech you are?


I don't see how being nice motivates people much. Nor does being unconditionally nasty.


You need conditional carrot and stick.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#14 •••
to be the degenerate leech you are


Ah look, more nice words.

Edit post

#15 •••
You need conditional carrot and stick.


I am glad that worked for you.

Edit post

#16 •••

now post spiderman gif and call it a day, you clearly can't take information in the brain from the rest of the posts I made.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#17 •••
you clearly can't take information in the brain from the rest of the posts I made.


thank you for your kindness, sir.

Edit post

#18 •••

thank you for yours also

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#19 •••

Your welcome

Edit post

#20 •••


The Universe is a huge accident.

Edit post

#21 •••
@FLRW

Accidents dont exist in physics.

Edit post

#22 •••
@GreatfulGoy

You have a compelling point on the issue of if god required disobedient children to be executed. Its possible that that's the standard of god maybe that's the seriousness of sin. Maybe only serious infractions should have warranted death not just any old infraction. It's also possible that this was only a civil law to enforce a moral law of respecting parents. God would still be responsible for commanding it but like requiring rape victims to marry the rapist or for enemies be put to death or women enemies be sold for profit maybe god perhaps rightly thought accomadating the culture was necessary even to that extent. Maybe the text wasn't accurate and jesus wasn't saying it was God's law but that even by this supposed command of god those jews weren't being consistent.

I am doing fancy footwork but I wouldn't necessarily write off the whole Bible based on difficulties like this

Edit post

#23 •••


What you're (linate) doing is essentially laying out several possible explanations:


1. **The command reflected God's actual moral standard for a particular circumstance.**


* This is the traditional reading many conservatives have taken.

* They would argue that rebellion against parents was viewed as a serious threat to the covenant community, not a minor offense.

* They often point out that the law in Deuteronomy 21 concerns a persistently rebellious son brought before the elders, not a child being executed for ordinary disobedience.


2. **The command was a civil law rather than a timeless moral law.**


* Similar to laws about property, warfare, and judicial procedures.

* The enduring principle would be "honor your parents," while the specific penalty belonged to ancient Israel's legal system.

* This is a common distinction in many Christian traditions.


3. **The law was an accommodation to a particular culture and historical setting.**


* Some theologians argue that God worked gradually within ancient societies rather than immediately abolishing every harsh institution.

* They see a trajectory in Scripture moving toward greater mercy and dignity, culminating in Jesus.


4. **The text may not perfectly reflect God's will.**


* More progressive Christians and some scholars take this route.

* They see Scripture as containing genuinely human elements and occasional misunderstandings about God.


5. **Jesus' use of the law in Mark 7 may be rhetorical.**


* In Gospel of Mark 7, Jesus is primarily accusing his opponents of hypocrisy.

* His argument is, in effect: "You claim to uphold the Law of Moses, yet your traditions undermine one of its central commands."

* The focus of the passage is their inconsistency, not necessarily a fresh endorsement of every civil penalty in the Torah.


What I find interesting is that your conclusion is actually quite modest: *"I wouldn't necessarily write off the whole Bible based on difficulties like this."*


Historically, that's how many believers have approached Scripture. They acknowledge there are texts involving slavery, warfare, capital punishment, and other morally difficult issues. Rather than assuming one difficult passage disproves everything, they ask whether the broader narrative, teachings, historical claims, and spiritual insights still have explanatory power.


The opposite approach—"if I find one passage I struggle with, the whole thing must be false"—is not the only rational response. It's a possible response, but not the only one.


The real question becomes: **Which explanation of the difficult passages best fits the total picture of Scripture, especially the character of God as revealed in Jesus?** Different Christian traditions answer that question differently, but that's usually where the debate ultimately leads.


Edit post

#24 •••
@linate

Blindly honouring your parents is how many non Christians (especially Jews) fail to ever get saved if you pogically extend this to how it works in practise.


Especially a daughter cant just become her own religion while dependent on eother the parents or the new husband the parents agree for her to marry.


This proves it is 1 of many social engineering laws and not from the Christian God.


If it is not from the Christian God that wspecially Jews shoukd hobour their parents so much they fail to become Christians it is then from God that he screwed up.


This same God apparently told some Jews of Old Testament to stone a man (who is never confiremd to himslef be Jewish) for collecting some sticks on the Sabbath. Yes. This was them asking God what shoukd we do and he himself exclaiming stoning to death as his chosen punishment.


Apparently this same God came in a different person (Dissociative Identity Disorder) and then told the Pharisees theyre too OCD avout Shabbat/Sabbath Laws and to even let Jews and Goyim alike pick wheat on a Saturday (which that aside, makes very little sense why the same God allowed this choseb day to change to the Sunday in any form or shape).


This same God told them they too worried about the laws and too little about the spirit of Love for God and Neighbour only to then say this as well:


Matthew 5:17-20


Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition


The Law and the Prophets
17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.[a] .
18 For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.
19 Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%205%3A17-20&version=RSVCE


The religion gaslights a lot.


By Tanakh Law, Jesus' Crucifixion was actually overdue not wrong. They said death penalty for any that lead the Peoplento alter or disobey rhe laws are pure scum and Deutoronomy basically mandates desth penalty by stoning for virtually all such scum moves.


The idea that the laws remain and the punishment changes makes 0 sense. They literally were told by God the Father to stone (as law) that is how nutcase insane the religion becomes when you analyse it deeper.

Edit post

The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.

It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.

#25 •••

You think about religion too much. thinking too much is bad.

Edit post

#26 •••
@SatanLucy
Accidents dont exist in physics.


You may want to read up on “Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle” and “Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems” aka “Godel’s Theorem”. Plus Chaos Theory’s “Butterfly Effect”. “Brownian Motion” might also be worth reading up on. “Blindspot Principle” is also relevant.

J A Wheelers “spacetime foam” or “quantum foam” idea may relate to Lawrence Krauss’ “Out of Nothing” ideas.

Edit post

#27 •••
@FLRW

Thank you for the list. I will skip.

Edit post

#28 •••
@GreatfulGoy

Modern GOD is a modern theorem only a few thousand years old, wholly human based and human derived, which should be as obvious as the nose on your face.


Back dating the theorem is simple but intellectually dishonest.


And associated religious books are just bundles of inky paper.


All aimed at getting the gullible to part with their money, their intellectual freedom and their sanity.


Which isn't to say that in terms of material evolution, religious theo-politics and social control hasn't been essential...Such was/is the effectiveness of programming and mind control.


Though here we now are, still thrashing about doing crazy religious stuff, but in the digitized technological future that we created, and GOD the creator bloke of the old stories is nowhere to be seen...Because he was never there....It was all a con GG, don't you get it?

Edit post

#29 •••

Psychologists and cognitive researchers commonly identify these 10 behavioral and mental signs of high intelligence: 

  1. Exceptional Pattern Recognition: The ability to intuitively connect the dots, spot irregularities in sequences, and link unrelated concepts. 
  2. Ability to Explain Complex Ideas Simply: The mark of true mastery is being able to strip away jargon and translate highly advanced topics into terms anyone can understand.
  3. Intellectual Humility: You are entirely comfortable saying "I don't know" and highly willing to revise your previous opinions when presented with new, accurate information. 
  4. Self-Correction and Reflection: You are acutely aware of your own thought processes and critique your own logic to perform better over time. 
  5. Comfort with Ambiguity: Instead of needing immediate, black-and-white answers, you can sit with uncertainty and explore multiple hypothetical possibilities. 
  6. Unconventional or Dry Humor: A strong sense of humor—especially dark or complex humor—requires creative thinking and the ability to tie completely separate ideas together. 
  7. Talking to Yourself: Verbalizing your thoughts aloud is a common mechanism used by highly capable thinkers to organize ideas and free up mental working memory. 
  8. Frequent Mind Wandering: Deep or frequent daydreaming is frequently linked to stronger working memory and a brain that is continuously processing solutions in the background. 
  9. Deep Empathy and Social Awareness: The ability to mentally model another person's history, psychology, and circumstances is an advanced cognitive act that often correlates with a high IQ and EQ. 
  10. Need for Mental Stimulation & Solo Reflection: You are naturally driven to explore topics in-depth and require consistent quiet time or solitude to fuel original thinking. 


Edit post

#30 •••
@FLRW
Psychologists and cognitive researchers commonly identify these 10 behavioral and mental signs of high intelligence: 


I find FLRW's intelligence to be much higher than all other non-human animals. Go FLRW! Keep banging out your access to meta-space intelligence

Edit post