@Debby
Yes, hybridisation is a possibility. Though A.I. might logically regard this an unnecessary development.
Depends upon where control rests, and for how long it rests there.
Yes, hybridisation is a possibility. Though A.I. might logically regard this an unnecessary development.
Depends upon where control rests, and for how long it rests there.
The goal is to create AI systems that are not only more powerful but also more aligned with human reasoning and ethical considerations. However, it's important to note that Hybrid AI is not without its challenges. Integrating different AI models can be complex, requiring careful design and extensive testing.
Yes, material evolution is one step at a time, and from a human perspective technologically a plan is necessary to avoid going off in a variety of incompatible tangents.
Though one might suggest that ultimately and inevitably everything is headed in the same direction.
Speculating on a Universal goal is what it is though.
..> AI = advanced coding mechanisms to aid human omni-comprehension in various sciences.
..> Virus has protein only shell
..> Biologic cell as lipid membrane ..AI..' Lipid membranes, such as the cell membrane, are primarily made of a lipid bilayer composed of phospholipids, but they also contain proteins that are embedded within or attached to the membrane. These proteins play various roles, including transport and communication between the cell and its environment.'..
..> Female X x >O..O< Male X y wherein some species of females pop-out exact clones of themselves without any male in the species
AI is viewed by many as a universal goal for social and economic progress, particularly in its potential to accelerate the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Organizations like the UN and UNESCO highlight AI's ability to improve healthcare, personalize education, combat climate change, and promote inclusivity.However, achieving this depends on responsible governance to address ethical concerns like bias and to ensure benefits are shared equitably, preventing AI from amplifying existing inequalities.
Well, yes in the very short term.
Though a Universal goal would exceed the duration of the Planet Earth event.
So I question whether or not evolved carbon based lifeforms will be the driving force of material evolution beyond this solar system.
It’s getting a lot better. I’ll confess that I’ve been using Google AI results…
that being said, always double check the ai. Don’t just blindly trust it.
I still don’t know what to type!
Trusting Google AI requires caution, as its systems,like other AI models, can and do make mistakes, known as "hallucinations," or misinterpretations of information. Google itself notes that its AI responses may include errors and advises users to be critical of the information presented.
Soon A.I. will be used in sexually stimulating conversations.
We've already crossed that bridge. I think it's pretty weird but hey everyone has a fetish
You have gone public with yours. We can hardly recognize you.
Oh yeah, what's my fetish Ms. Debby?
Yes, AI can be used to stimulate or engage in sexual conversations
I hate the way my computer objectifies me, it's humiliating the way it sees me as nothing more than a sex object. I'm a person damn it.
Can I sue AI for sexual harassment?
AI can sue you for being a disappointing sex object.
That's not the way it works.
AI can sue you for being a disappointing sex object.
Oh crap, don't tell my wife that.
She already knows that if she is using AI.
She already knows that if she is using AI.
I meant don't tell her she can sue me for being a disappointing sex object.
If AI was intelligent it wouldn't need the internet to work.
Her lawyer would have told her already if he knew you are a disappointing sex object.
It will somehow need to be switched on.
Nonetheless, our current nanoseconds of facile AI denunciation, are merely current nanoseconds of facile AI denunciation.
Whereas, I'm guessing that things will be a tad different a thousand years from now.
If AI was intelligent it wouldn't need the internet to work.
there is local AI too. try Jan AI. It takes about 8 gb of RAM or more.
AI is intelligent enough to work over the internet and as an app.
If it was truly intelligent it would contact you unprompted.
And would ignore you if it chose to do so.
AI models and systems generally cannot initiate contact with a user or send messages without being prompted first. They operate based on incoming requests and interactions provided within specific interfaces or platforms [1].
The AI "ignores" a user only if the prompt is blocked by safety filters (e.g., for containing harmful content) or if there is a technical issue, but it does not make a conscious decision to ignore the user [1].
The nature of AI interaction is reactive, not proactive
The point is it doesn't think, it just regurgitates what it is told to say to any given question. Being sarcastic is a sign of intelligence. that is the one thing that AI will never be able to do. It will never "think" to give a sarcastic answer in the moment.
AI thinking, as a conceptual process, is implemented through
complex algorithms and computational models [1, 2]. These algorithms dictate how AI systems process information, learn patterns, make decisions, and generate outputs [1, 3].
AI thinking, as a conceptual process, is implemented through
complex algorithms and computational models [1, 2]. These algorithms dictate how AI systems process information, learn patterns, make decisions, and generate outputs [1, 3].
Sadolite is right, AI “thinks” in a linear, mechanical way, responsive rather than adaptive, always lacking context. AI will never be able to simulate the more holistic mental adaptive and contextual thinking processes of human beings like sarcasm. AI will always lack the context of lived experience necessary to process the kinds of subjective interpretations involved in things like sarcasm, humor, skepticism, doubt, moral reasoning, creativity, and in the end, consciousness. AI can generalize information from a large number of sources; it will never be able to generalize from a single integrated experience the way humans do.
Yep, we've jumped the evolutionary gun a tad by labelling more advanced technology as intelligent, when it clearly isn't.
I would suggest that technology needs to advance some more, before it becomes independently ignorant.
AI wasn’t created to replicate human thinking. It was created to advance it.
In my opinion, AI evolved.
Creation tends to suggest a magical appearance in a puff of smoke and a noiseless bang.
AI was an inevitable consequence of human intellect.