Locked

1990s-2000s Nostalgia Mafia (DP2)

Started by Kohai

Replies
289
Posts
290
Page
4 / 10

Conversation

Total: 290
ISO #91 •••

I think I have a 100 percent solve. Just waiting on awesome

Edit post

ISO #92 •••
--> @whiteflame
Yes, so obviously I'd make the very smart choice as scum to fake my claim in such a way that I would partially CC two flipped players and two other claims on the table. Certainly doesn't make me stand out as obvious. I understand not liking the CC, but come on man. Do you seriously think I'd give a fake claim as scum that CCs this many people and then decide to use it in full after that flip?


Youve done crazier things aka shoot a claimed PGO. You know this is WIFOM.


I need to reread DP1

Edit post

ISO #93 •••
--> @ILikePie5

Also still claim your role please

Edit post

ISO #94 •••
--> @Mikal
Cus anti claim. I think I have a solve and don’t want to risk anything till we lock it in. I don’t need your character. What role are you ?


Any explanation for the kill? Cause if not, it had to come from anti-claim (and I think the only people who had full claimed were Supa and Max), so I don’t think your character matters. I would like your character and justification. I’ll full claim after that




Edit post

ISO #95 •••
--> @ILikePie5

Tp Sk


literally first thing that came to my mind.

Edit post

ISO #96 •••
--> @awesome5000, @RexFavilla

Would like full claims and justifications from yall as well as it is at best MYLO

Edit post

ISO #97 •••
--> @ILikePie5

I’ll full claim if you full claim as well. But I need to hear what awesome did first and I’ll solve

Edit post

ISO #98 •••
--> @Mikal
I’ll full claim if you full claim as well. But I need to hear what awesome did first and I’ll solve


Thats fine with me. I’ll reread DP1 in the meantime

Edit post

ISO #99 •••
--> @ILikePie5
Youve done crazier things aka shoot a claimed PGO. You know this is WIFOM.

I need to reread DP1


Shooting you when you claimed is one thing, since that was betting on whether you were telling the truth. Going into a DP with two flips that CC each of the roles I’m planning to claim and two existing claims on the table that do the same and going ahead with the dual fake claim anyway would be beyond anything I’ve ever tried before, particularly in a game like this where I, as scum, would only need one mislynch to end this and attention on me detracts from that.


It’s WIFOM, yes, but damn, this would be the worst informed fake claim choice I’ve ever decided to go ahead with.

Edit post

ISO #100 •••

I will give an early insight. I think it’s 3-2-1



which is why I asked wf if he thought it was mylo. If someone assuming that death is from anti claim it’s way to much tmi. Logical thought is there is a tp sk in game

Edit post

ISO #101 •••

Also means if there is a tp and we hit them and not scum. We still lose

Edit post

ISO #102 •••

Vote Count


Not voting: (6/6): ILikePie, Awesome5000, Airmax1227, Rex, Mikal, Whiteflame 


With 6 players alive it takes 4 to lynch.


Day phase 2 will end on Saturday 9/20/2025 @ 6:00 PM EST unless there is a majority. 


Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #103 •••
--> @Mikal
I will give an early insight. I think it’s 3-2-1 

which is why I asked wf if he thought it was mylo. If someone assuming that death is from anti claim it’s way to much tmi. Logical thought is there is a tp sk in game


That seems like such a logical leap to me. We know there was a second NK. We don’t know what the source for that was. I’ve mentioned that the anti-claim mechanic could have affected that. It’s the logical conclusion to derive from the four claims we had in DP1 when we know anti-claim was in play and no one aside from Max has claimed to be interfered with. A TP SK is an assumption based on nothing from the OP or anything mod confirmed, just a means to fill in the blank of why a second NK could have happened.

Edit post

ISO #104 •••
--> @whiteflame

I think it’s way more weird to assume an anti claim killed someone when there is no precedent for that and the person who died (neither of them) had claimed

Edit post

ISO #105 •••
--> @Mikal

Guess we’re of two very different minds on this. While we’re at it, let’s ignore the repetition in the OP of “extremely nasty” and the synonymous “very nasty” next to the anti-claim mechanic. I’m not expecting this form of anti-claim to be the same as ones we’ve seen because I’ve never seen a mod emphasize the impact of it so severely. Why should we assume anti-claim is functionally the same as it has in previous games? Why couldn’t the result harm unclaimed town members?

Edit post

ISO #106 •••
--> @whiteflame

doesnt anti claim by definition mean you have to claim to have it impact you. Did I miss it and did either of those 2 claim?

Edit post

ISO #107 •••
--> @whiteflame

For what it’s worth. I don’t think you’re scum. I think your town or tp



Edit post

ISO #108 •••

Prob tp


Edit post

ISO #109 •••
--> @Mikal
doesnt anti claim by definition mean you have to claim to have it impact you. Did I miss it and did either of those 2 claim?


Thats been how I’ve seen it used in games on here and on DART, yes. Not the only way I’ve seen it described for games on other sites, but I’ll grant you that would not be usual for here.


For what it’s worth. I don’t think you’re scum. I think your town or tp


Well, at least you’re closer to being correct. I’ll take the 50-50.

Edit post

ISO #110 •••

Really need awesome to post then I can move this along

Edit post

ISO #111 •••
--> @Mikal

my role either enables or disables day chat for everyone


i did not disable day chat

Edit post

ISO #112 •••

do we have any hint of who unsaid desparado'd

Edit post

ISO #113 •••

it looks like me and unsaid are TvT


who said we were SvS and can we kill them

Edit post

ISO #114 •••
--> @awesome5000

who did you target last night ?

Edit post

ISO #115 •••
--> @awesome5000

Are are you saying you did nothing?

Edit post

ISO #116 •••
--> @Mikal

yes

Edit post

ISO #117 •••
--> @Mikal

i don't target anyone with my move

Edit post

ISO #118 •••

Okay. I’ll post in a bit. Wf and him are scum

Edit post

ISO #119 •••

Unless David bastard modded

Edit post

ISO #120 •••
--> @Mikal
Okay. I’ll post in a bit. Wf and him are scum


So, your thinking here is that I bussed my partner at the end of the last DP saying he was my choice for the lynch with very little time left, allowed myself to be derailed from that lynch by you, and then claimed to visit and Cop him innocent because... I guess I was done bussing him?


Again, really interested to get that essay.

Edit post