Locked

The Legend of Zelda: The Mafia Game (DP2)

Started by Kohai

Replies
691
Posts
692
Page
4 / 24

Conversation

Total: 692
ISO #91 •••
--> @whiteflame
Yeah, I would have unvoted. And yes, if I believed I was Link and I saw someone claim that character, I would have double-checked my PM. Fair points.


Exactly. And he claims he made the same mistake before. If anything that’s even worse. Help me pursue a full claim from him

Edit post

ISO #92 •••
--> @ILikePie5
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

ISO #93 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

ISO #94 •••
--> @ILikePie5, @wylted

lol. I know you trying to use hard on everyone, trying to push them all to go after me, but the only reason I claimed male was because I thought I was Link.


I “lied” about my character’s gender the same way I “lied” about being Link- just by misreading my PM.


Me claiming male is exactly what one would expect if I misread my PM and thought I was Link. This isn’t rocket science.

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #95 •••
--> @wylted
Did you target magic?


I did not

Edit post

ISO #96 •••
--> @Mag1cman
Banana said she had confirmable role. Scum doesn’t need to know what specifically the role is to have an incentive to kill her


I think that's reason enough to explain why she was killed. Scum would have had limited info about roles and characters going into the NP as well, so the alternative was shooting in the dark with someone else.

Edit post

ISO #97 •••
--> @ILikePie5
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

ISO #98 •••
--> @ILikePie5
Exactly. And he claims he made the same mistake before. If anything that’s even worse. Help me pursue a full claim from him


I'm considering it. Give me a bit to catch up.

Edit post

ISO #99 •••

Vote Count


Mag1c (2/5): Pie, Wylted

Pie (1/5): Mag1c

Wylted (1/5): Magoroth


Not voting:  Thoth, Lunatic, Rex, Whiteflame



Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #100 •••
--> @ILikePie5, @whiteflame
Exactly. And he claims he made the same mistake before. If anything that’s even worse. Help me pursue a full claim from him


How does that make things worse?


maybe it’s just that sometimes I don’t pay as much attention while reading as I should. Remember that I was town in Paper Mario.


and again, if you think you’re Link, you’re going to vote that, not Unvote. Notice the sleight of hand tactic from Pie: He appeals to what people would’ve done in his shoes, but in not in the shoes of someone who thought their PM said they were Link.


this isn’t honest argumentation.

lets get his claim

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #101 •••
--> @whiteflame, @wylted

Fuck no.


youre letting Pie convince you. Stop letting him convince you just because he’s bold. Have a logical backbone


and yall are just ignoring my responses. wtf is wrong with you people

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #102 •••
--> @whiteflame, @wylted

Can you actually read my responses to Pie’s instead of letting Pie dictate things for you. Seriously.

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #103 •••

Responses to Pie’s logic

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #104 •••

Not a fan of Pie styling himself Town leader here. I’m not seeing what Mag1c is seeing here but it feels very strange that Pie is scumreading him. I know it’s not much, but it makes me sus of ILikePie5.

Edit post

ISO #105 •••
--> @Mag1cman

Dude, I haven't caught up yet and I'm actively working on doing so while trying to respond to all these new posts. I didn't say I'm convinced yet, so let me get through it.

Edit post

ISO #106 •••

Legit Pie is only starting to get pull because he’s good at being the loudest voice in the room. Not because of any good reasoning in his “case”

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #107 •••
--> @Mag1cman

He dumbass, maybe it’s cause your arguments are stupud and all WIFOM. Objective fact is you lied about your gender, and you only revealed that now.

Edit post

ISO #108 •••
--> @Magoroth
Not a fan of Pie styling himself Town leader here.


That’s how I play. Ask anyone.


I’m not seeing what Mag1c is seeing here but it feels very strange that Pie is scumreading him. I know it’s not much, but it makes me sus of ILikePie5.


Why is strange to scumread someone who lied about his soft claim. Someone who claims they didnt read their PM before voting someone for a CC. And especially cause that CC was main character Link.

Edit post

ISO #109 •••
--> @Mag1cman
Legit Pie is only starting to get pull because he’s good at being the loudest voice in the room. Not because of any good reasoning in his “case”


This is just funny. Go look at post counts for this DP. pIE iS lOUdesT perSoN In tHE rooM

Edit post

ISO #110 •••

Literally anyone can make a mistake and think they’re someone they’re not. It’s not a lie, it’s a mistake. It’s easily possible.

Edit post

ISO #111 •••
--> @ILikePie5

lol ok bitch boy


objective fact is you’ve been misinterpreting everything I’ve been doing intentionally with the worse bad faith sleight of hand arguments. You pushed Thoth when some people were against him, and now you’re pushing me when you think people will be against me.


WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM. But what about the possibility of mag1c’s WIFOM guys!


This really is Paper Mario Mafia all over again. As unfortunate as my tracker/watcher mix-up from that game was, Lunatic’s arguments about how I could just be WIFOMing were proven wrong.


WIFOM appeal is a crutch when you want to ignore incentives.


You know the incentives don’t match. Scum could easily appealed to low time and vote long before Thoth re-entered the thread to claim.



Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #112 •••
--> @Magoroth
Literally anyone can make a mistake and think they’re someone they’re not. It’s not a lie, it’s a mistake. It’s easily possible.


When the stakes are as high as CCing someone? Mikal literally did this in a previous game. “Innocent mistake,” doesn’t cut it.

Edit post

ISO #113 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

ISO #114 •••
--> @ILikePie5

What makes It any less likely? Mag1c’s response to his mistake was genuine, he didn’t fake that. “Sorry sorry”, that’s not fake.

Edit post

ISO #115 •••
--> @wylted

Im getting pissed excuse I should be widely townread at this point for what was an obvious mistake that matches no scum incentive, and yet, people are somehow buying even a small percent of Pie’s arguments.

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #116 •••

*getting pissed because

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #117 •••
--> @Magoroth
What makes It any less likely? Mag1c’s response to his mistake was genuine, he didn’t fake that. “Sorry sorry”, that’s not fake.


You weren’t in the game Mikal did that. Everyone also believed him that game.

Edit post

ISO #118 •••
--> @Thoth, @whiteflame

“No scum incentive” to hammer the guy that claimed Link?

Edit post

ISO #119 •••
--> @ILikePie5, @Magoroth
You weren’t in the game Mikal did that. Everyone also believed him that game.

neither was I.


I’ll go see what Mikal did in that game. I guarantee there’s a difference

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

ISO #120 •••
--> @ILikePie5
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post