Locked

Solo Leveling Mafia - DP1

Started by Mikal

Replies
1,514
Posts
1,515
Page
8 / 51

Conversation

Total: 1,515
ISO #211 •••
--> @Kohai
So yeah I'll just hard claim my character is kohai. I won't claim roles yet but at least we can get that started 


Well this aged well lmaooo

Edit post

ISO #212 •••
--> @Kohai
Fine. I'll just full claim since I already claimed character. 

Character - Kohai
Role - Currnelty VT become ascetic upon being recruited 
Justification - as a moderator nothing gets past me 


So why aren’t you Bulletproof Ascetic

Edit post

ISO #213 •••

Happy with lynching Kohai here

Edit post

ISO #214 •••
--> @ILikePie5
CreamPie
Doesnt really matter to me cause it’s WIFOM. Base case objectively it’s scummy, or you’re just dumb, which is a possibility I’m starting to warm up to.


To be clear, you are rejecting confirmable player specific behavioral tendencies to instead overlay a generalistic scum behavior framework? And you're backing off that push, not with behavioral analysis but with a non-committal ad-hominem. And you're doing this as the wagon shows itself to be dead. And you're moving into the next easiest wagon?


So you have no actual stance yet that actually relates to trying to read a player as a player. You're using non-specific principles to pressure people at this point in the DP?


VTL creamPie

Edit post

ISO #215 •••

I'm tired of lynching Kohai!


My Kohai lynching muscles are exhausted!

Edit post

ISO #216 •••
--> @wylted
His writing style would indicate he is legitimately drunk right now though so I would be cautious about attributing too much to analyzing his style at the very least but his thoughts should be harder to veil in that state


I'm not about to make a game relevant comment, but how does one get "legitimately drunk" off Moscato?

Edit post

ISO #217 •••

Kohai's justification is that abilities pass over him

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #218 •••
--> @Thoth
I'd like to suggest that we DISCUSS softing whether we are a show character or ourselves. Not that we do it, but that we discuss whether or not we should do it.


Solo Leveling isn't exactly a series known for having a lot of main characters, so no, I don't like this idea at all. Softing this game seems especially pointless given how many people are likely to just say their characters are themselves.

Edit post

ISO #219 •••
--> @ILikePie5
So why aren’t you Bulletproof Ascetic


because that's wayyyy too OP'd? Also that's a quick summary of it not a direct copy and paste

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #220 •••
--> @Mestari

Pie's tactic, whether town or scum, is to go for weak points -- it's a bulldozer approach where the point is not necessarily to uncover scum but to narrow his POE. Or to give the appearance of narrowing his POE, obviously.

Edit post

ISO #221 •••
--> @Mestari
I'm not about to make a game relevant comment, but how does one get "legitimately drunk" off Moscato?

Speaking of game-irrelevant comments, I have superhumanly high alcohol tolerance. I gave up drinking for fear of turning my liver into a deather after downing eight ounces of 151-proof Everclear and feeling nothing.

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #222 •••
--> @whiteflame
Solo Leveling isn't exactly a series known for having a lot of main characters, so no, I don't like this idea at all. Softing this game seems especially pointless given how many people are likely to just say their characters are themselves.

That's about all I needed to hear to drop that topic, then.

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #223 •••
--> @Mestari
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

ISO #224 •••

Lol and you got me about how softing that you're not in the show just means you are yourself. didn't think of that

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #225 •••
--> @Mestari
To be clear, you are rejecting confirmable player specific behavioral tendencies to instead overlay a generalistic scum behavior framework?


Yes, because those “tendencies” aren’t confirmable by anyways. They’re WIFOM.


And you're backing off that push, not with behavioral analysis but with a non-committal ad-hominem.


I got the information I needed to move on and better inform my read of you


And you're doing this as the wagon shows itself to be dead. And you're moving into the next easiest wagon?


I support the mod confirmed townie in his assessment yes, and for other reasons, namely Kohai as town is a liability anyways


So you have no actual stance yet that actually relates to trying to read a player as a player. You're using non-specific principles to pressure people at this point in the DP?

VTL creamPie


Im using common sense vs tongue twisters


Edit post

ISO #226 •••

Vote Count


Mestari 2/9 - Alyssa, Thoth

Mag1cman 2/9 - Casey_Risk, Rex

Kohai 3/9 - Mag1cman, ILikePie5, wylted

ILikePie5 1/9 - Mestari

Edit post

ISO #227 •••

Vote Count


Kohai 3/9 - Mag1cman, ILikePie5, wylted

Mestari 2/9 - Alyssa, Thoth

Mag1cman 2/9 - Casey_Risk, Rex

Pie 1/9 - Mestari

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #228 •••
--> @Kohai
because that's wayyyy too OP'd? Also that's a quick summary of it not a direct copy and paste 


Wym a quick summary vs direct copy paste

Edit post

ISO #229 •••
--> @Kohai
Character - Kohai
Role - Currnelty VT become ascetic upon being recruited
Justification - as a moderator nothing gets past me


Really don't get just straight up claiming this under limited pressure (I see 3 votes leading up to this), but here we are. I would give you some towncred for claiming this early, but given the info in the OP, everyone knew that peoples' characters could just be themselves.

Edit post

ISO #230 •••
--> @whiteflame
Really don't get just straight up claiming this under limited pressure (I see 3 votes leading up to this), but here we are. I would give you some towncred for claiming this early, but given the info in the OP, everyone knew that peoples' characters could just be themselves.


Cut him some slack, he has quick-lynch PTSD lol

Edit post

ISO #231 •••
--> @Wryly
Pie's tactic, whether town or scum, is to go for weak points -- it's a bulldozer approach where the point is not necessarily to uncover scum but to narrow his POE. Or to give the appearance of narrowing his POE, obviously. 


POE is always king.

Edit post

ISO #232 •••

I drink Mexican Mudslides occasionally, but not for the alcohol content, just because it's spicy chocolate milk and my favorite milk has always come from brown cows.

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.

ISO #233 •••

Yeah, I'm going to stick on Pie for now. He's pivoting between targets he sees as easy, not making reads directly tied to player behavior, shifting the burden of accuracy from himself to a confirmed townie to dissolve himself off accountability. It's giving either scum, or if he's town it's giving FT vibes. What I mean by that is refusing to ever accept being wrong and positioning himself to claim he wasn't wrong if it was clear he was. So if you tell me it's FT in a trench coat I'd buy he's town, but I'm happy with where my vote is for the evening.

Edit post

ISO #234 •••

Why did Mikal need to specify that dead players don't count toward faction totals


Are there roles that have utility after death and might blur the line enough to require that clarification?

Edit post

ISO #235 •••

For further clarification, there's a valid reason to use generic frameworks to read players you don't know. But then rejecting the opportunity to later actually analyze the player as they play in favor of continuing to use generic frameworks, that doesn't appear to me as legitimate scumhunting.

Edit post

ISO #236 •••
--> @Wryly
Cut him some slack, he has quick-lynch PTSD lol


You know... you have a point.

Edit post

ISO #237 •••
--> @Wryly
Wryly
Why did Mikal need to specify that dead players don't count toward faction totals



Are there roles that have utility after death and might blur the line enough to require that clarification?


Because the town is going to cannibalize itself trying to have more players in their guild.

Edit post

ISO #238 •••
--> @Wryly
Why did Mikal need to specify that dead players don't count toward faction totals

Are there roles that have utility after death and might blur the line enough to require that clarification?


I was just thinking about that. I think we'd have to assume that there's a Restless Spirit/Tree Stump or the like among the roles in this game based on that line from Mikal.

Edit post

ISO #239 •••

Claims List

Wylted - Choi Jong-In - Leader of the Hunters

Alysa - ?? - ??

WF ?? - ??

Helz ?? - ??

Luna - Baek Yoonho - Leader of the white tiger guild

Banana ?? - ??

Kohai - Kohai - VT / Ascetic upon being recruited

Pie ?? - ??

Mharm ?? - ??

Wyrly ?? - ??

Skep ?? - ??

Thoth - ?? probably himself based on his not so soft --

Supa ?? - ??

Max ?? - ??

Casey Risk ?? - ??

Mestari ?? - ??

Shining ?? - ??


Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #240 •••
--> @Mestari

If I correctly understand how guild recruitment works, this could give an interesting game-theoretic solution: If both guilds don't recruit anyone from now on, they will have the same number of members and should all win together. I will ask Mikal whether or not a tie in members lets the guild leader win.

Edit post

Forum signatures are bullshit. Nobody wants to waste their time and bandwidth reading something they have read 29,998,559,671,349 times before.