Why I don't like the EC.
The electoral college is just Affirmative Action for bum states that couldn't attract as many people to live there.
0 likes
Should the US Abolish the Electoral College
The United States is unique among democratic nations in that we elect the President indirectly through an electoral college. According to Article II, Section I, Clause 3 of the Constitution: The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President. In theory the electoral college would level the playing field between large states and smaller states; however, in practice most states are solidly red or blue and only a handful of states are "swing" states. The result is that those "swing" states often have bigger influence than other safe states. In addition to this, one does not have to win the popular vote to become President. In 2000 and 2016 the person who won the Presidency lost the popular vote. \
Where do you stand?
Sign in to share your stance.
Your stance can change. Your earlier arguments stay where you posted them.
For 100% · 3
Undecided 0% · 0
Against 0% · 0
3 participating members
Arguments for (2)
Does a worse job of representing the country
Basing representation on states seems largely arbitrary since states are not homogeneous and state members don't tend to all share the same interests. And even if states did share similar interests, the size of the state doesn't represent the size of the group. If California was five states, should it have more representation? If there's some minority faction being protected by the EC, basing their representation on the way the borders of their administrative district are drawn up seems arbitrary and doesn't accomplish that goal. We could run a hundred simulations where we divide states arbitrarily, and the results will average out to the popular vote. All the electoral college does is add variability, which makes representation worse and not better. The EC helps represent some minorities more, like members of Delaware. But it makes others be represented worse, like members of a Delaware-sized section in California. May as well make a voting system based on dividing people into random clumps, or based on splitting people up by the color of their hat.
1 like
This actually isn't strictly true. Due to winner take all and the way states work geographically, randomly drawing states will consistently increase representation of rural voters. But there are likely still more straightforward and less arbitrary ways to do this, like just weighting rural votes more. Even so, this is trading over representation of some minorities for under representation of others. The EC under represents ethnic minorities such as Black voters, as well as other minority factions that live more in urban and suburban areas.
0 likes
Arguments against (0)
No arguments against this motion yet.