He's a strong leader and a man's man. Not a coward by any means. Maybe not our greatest president but the best we've had in a while
Center-right
Score -0.51 (Center-right range)
The Center-right range is above -0.65 through -0.25.
Social views were your strongest rightward influence; your other scored dimensions were closer to the center. Your overall score of -0.51 falls in the Center-right range.
Stable within this range: 0.14 points from the Conservative boundary.
Views by dimension
He's a strong leader and a man's man. Not a coward by any means. Maybe not our greatest president but the best we've had in a while
I think it's a great idea and in theory it would be efficient but you can't tell until it's in effect
It's been said many times before, "the only person who can stop the bad guy with a gun is the good guy with a gun." Banning firearms isn't gonna do anything for cartel members and gangbangers because they already get most of their weapons illegally. It just means the civilians are defenseless
For instance, Sharia law says that a muslim man living in the US can kill his wife if she disobeys him or sees another man. It also says he can have multiple wives. Should he be allowed to follow his religion when it conflicts with Federal Law and general human rights? I think not.
The only reason we should support them at all is so that Russia doesn't succeed and become an even greater threat.
We shouldn't be expected to protect everyone just because we're the strongest, it's a group effort. The rest of NATO is like a group of fair weather friends
Theodore Roosevelt said "speak softly and carry a big stick." That doesn't mean to go around beating everybody with the stick but it should always be in hand and ready to be used
Islam has proven time and time again that the only way to truly subdue it is to destroy it