Mal

Yeah .

Yeah.

Since we have people scared to enter the debate rounds, is taxation theft?

I accept your agreement.

Yes they'll make that choice of salt, a little or a lot of salt, maybe a dab of peppa, whateva.

Is saying the gods of theism aren't real a claim to be yet supported?

I wonder beliefs about the afterlife exist from experience as opposed to designing a vehicle called belief to cope with fears.

So all religion is created by humans. We create our beliefs. Nothing influences or move us. Is that right?

Do you agree that when atheists make positive claims, they have the onus of substantiating?

Yup all of the above.

Even atheists admit their beliefs.

Yeah the government forces folks. That's why they're a governed people.

For live debates, to hear archives of debates and conversation on religion, politics, sexuality, healthcare , taxes , gun control and other controversial matters, visit that web address below

https://youtube.com/@j.talkstothepeopleradio6008?si=Edxdc6hKlSlLqlCv

follow the channel, turn on post notifications.

No I don't have to force the truth. You either continue to reject it or become woke. Realize .

I know what I mean when I say it.

Make excuses for your lack of attention. We've always bumped heads. It is what it is.

There is no separation of church/religion and state.

The government holds secularists belief systems supported by the society, voters with their belief systems that elected them into policy.

You made your decision. I don't mean in the present. Your "no" is just reiterated.

Your problem is , selective reading. But go on about your business.

Does the money mean more than your life?

Is there anything you can do within the system that does not require money being involved or spent?

If the answer is no, there really is no such thing as "financial freedom".

Instead of curing cancer, it's more profitable to not .

Debatecraft.......chime in.

Will you believe in the gods of theism now?

No I said Christianity was invented by man. I didn't say religion period or anything else. Once you take things seriously, you can pay attention and learn .

Don't charge the messenger, charge the sender.

Now those adding their own to the message, that's different.

Books can't condemn but people you say so where do they get the criteria you say they condemn from, the book , right.

So who or what is initiating, the person or what the person reads and regurgitates and says "according to this, you are this , you are that".

The person is just reading what it says but the reader you say is actually doing the condemning.

Like saying the messenger is the insulter and the messenger is just giving you the message of the one actually sending the insults having the messenger deliver them.

The cholesterol, trans fat will kill me before any gun.

Ok it's not "very" speculative, just speculative.

That is the possibility to the secularists. Those who are called by a possible higher power or not.

How did you develop it and maintain the decision of being atheist?

I was going to order a burger. Nevermind.

Sure it's a broad meaning. A meaning nonetheless.