Okay, patch coming soon. You should be able to do it in a few mins.
Savant · a year ago
Okay, patch coming soon. You should be able to do it in a few mins.
Savant · a year ago
You click on the three dots
Savant · a year ago
Well, Trump is the downright moron H L Mencken predicted in 1920.
Mencken was a full-blown racist. His idea of a "moron" is probably just anyone who supports human rights.
Savant · a year ago
I'm gonna unmark you as offensive for now, but if you make an offensive post or comment, you gotta click the dropdown and label it as offensive.
Savant · a year ago
Anytime I want to do a Rage bait thread, I label it as, "Rage bait" in advance and all non-Rage bait threads I leave the Rage bait label off? Many people like rage baiting.
If you tell the mods you will self-label your offensive posts and comments as offensive, they will probably agree to unmark you as automatically offensive (I could, but you should really talk to the official mods or they may be confused and remark you). That way, your offensive posts still get labeled but the mods don't have to manually label all your posts. Message RationalTheist.
When I say "mark as offensive" I mean click the three dots and officially mark it. Don't just put "Rage bait" in the title.
Savant · a year ago
Why don’t you apply it here.
They did apply it to Remy, but presumably you have offensive posts enabled as viewable so it still shows normally to you.
Savant · a year ago
Do farmers get celebrated as heroes for that? No. We mostly struggle to make a living and the bad farmers actually profit more than good farmers who try to make their food as healthy as possible.
If there are bad farmers, it might explain why farmers aren't universally praised. Individually praised, sure, but it would be like praising all politicians because some of them save lives.
Savant · a year ago
Not once did I see anybody hailing farmers as heroes.
The point wasn't that they were producing food, it was that they were near other people and hence risking infection. People praised nurses too, it's not because they thought food comes from the hospital.
Savant · a year ago
I'm the captain now.
Savant · a year ago
when i post it takes me to the post. lets test it now
edit: yes, it did. can you send me a video?
Savant · a year ago
test
edit
edit2
Savant · a year ago
editing again
part 2
part 3
Savant · a year ago
comment editing test
edit 1
edit 2
edit3
Savant · a year ago
The right believes that anyone who is anti Trump is a communist
And you just take their word for it?
Savant · a year ago
Should be fixed now. At least it will be when this next push makes it to Heroku, which should only be a minute or so.
The Epstein files thing was a gift to Democrats straight from heaven. Even with how much Trump tends to shoot himself in the foot, it looked like the files dominating the news cycle was going to damage his image more than usual. Progressives online of course swore they weren't going to get distracted with another issue.
Yet somehow, this was the time that certain people chose to get offended by Sydney Sweeney's commercial. The controversy is stupid, everyone knows it's stupid, and most people, even on the left, don't care. That makes it even more embarrassing that they've allowed it to get the attention it's getting when they really need as much of the news cycle as they can get to cover the Epstein files. But enough people on the left can't help but take the bait. Attacking an attractive woman for being a registered Republican and accusing her of being a Nazi is almost the absolute worst thing the left could do right now, and yet somehow it seems like announcing they don't care about it is just giving it more attention.
I'd say most Democrats don't think Sweeney is a Nazi, but certain communities on the left absolutely do, and it's looking more likely that other Democrats are going to feel a need to justify the attack on the commercial because of the herd mentality parties always seem to have. I haven't seen anyone take the bait this hard since Kamala mentioned Trump's rally sizes in the debate.
aaa
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="100" height="100">
<circle cx="50" cy="50" r="40" stroke="blue" stroke-width="4" fill="lightblue" />
</svg>
Savant · a year ago
Do a reverse image search. Zoroastrian symbol comes up, Nazi eagle doesn't.
Savant · a year ago
It does not look like the Zoroastrian Symbol
He's literally holding the ring out to the left like the dude in the Zoroastrian symbol. Plus the two lines coming out to the side, plus the hat, plus the ring around his waist. Plus the long chin which was I think an attempt to copy the beard. Even his arms are in basically the same position. Fauxlaw didn't even post an eagle, he posted a guy with wings. If it's an eagle, where's the beak?
Not saying it looks like the American Eagle, just that it's that far off of a comparison.
Savant · a year ago
Yeah I know because I searched it. The logo is a Zoroastrian symbol, it's different. Like comparing the eagle on a US coin to the Nazi eagle.
Savant · a year ago
test