fauxlaw

Y'all hang that "DEMOCRAT" flag in front of socialism, and you think that makes it a different philosophy? Bullshyte. The only difference is that the donkey is now pulling a failed cart. That is what socialism is: FAILED. Failed because it has never, ever, ever been able to sustain itself in 178 years siince the failures, Marx/Engels, proposed the Communist Manifedsto in 1848. Why? Because socialism has no clue how to create wqewalth. Beg, borrow and steal it, sure, but any arsewipe can do that. Create from scratch? Not in the formula of that politick.

You show me what makes this proposed political party viable.

The evidence is the fact that he’s doing it right in front of our face.

Doing WHAT thaty is unconstituti0onal accordfing to you? And how does your claim match the several actions taken by Truman, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama & Biden, as I addressed earlier, and if they are con trary to Consdtituti9onal muster, where were you, then? Nope, I don't buy ytour accusation. Not at all.

Because you don’t want to.

Because I don't want to... WGAT? See the list of 30k Trump lies? The hell I don't. I demand seeing them. They constitute more asccusations without evidence.

The other measure would be impeachment and removal from office.

Your heroes have already tried that. Twice. Failed twice. Go for three? Go ahead. Fail thrice.

Strike three. Youi're out.

This slogan was masively popularized by Marx & Engels, your socialist heroes. It is, however, incorrect to believe your heroes coined the phrase. Nope, just like money, these socialists depended on another's cleverness and productivity. They merely borrowed the phrase, to the extent that the true creator is utterly forgotten. She was Flora Tristan, a French-Peruvian feminist/activist who actually had working, paying jobs.

Accordng to Google, when asked "did marx and engels ever acknowledge flora tristan as creator of their popular phrase, "workers of the world unite?" Here's Google AI response:

"No, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels never acknowledged Flora Tristan as the creator of their famous slogan, "Workers of the world, unite!" In fact, they never directly cited or credited her as the source for the idea of a universal working-class union. [1, 2, 3, 4]"

However, when Google is asked "who created the term "workers of the world, unite," Google AI replied: "The phrase was created by philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. It first appeared as the famous concluding rallying cry in The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848. [1]"

No, it first appeared in Flora Tristan's book in 1843: "The Worker's Union."

That's the spoils of other peoples' money, apparently including Google AI's money: Deadbeatism. AKA: failure.

Which federal courts already ruled did not apply here.

See all above. We do not have a perfect system in America. Just the best system available for now. Socialism, even a Democrat version of it, is not the answer.

Marx, himself, was a deadbeat who depended on his friend, Engel's father's wealth virtually Marx's entire adult life, for himself, and his own family.. There's a success story for you: other peoples' money. That's where NY is going, full speed ahead, lookiong in the rearview mirror.

OJ was acquitted, so he was innocent right?

In the eyes of the law, YES. By what other measure does the Constitution offer? Sometimes, the law get's it wrong. It's not perfect. Neither is democracy. Big news. So be it. That's democracy. Is that why socialism [totalitarianism] is so popular among Dems today, sweeping their NY primaries last night? Why does NY think it's so smart? Because it's social?

But we’re dealing with MAGA

Which is... what? An. institgution? Immovable? No, a passing fad, just like "WOP" [war on poverty] Johnson declared it, but there was no war. Never declared by your holy congress.

From the standpoint of impeachability, none of these examples are analogous... The offense is in how blatantly he did it.

Blatantly? How dores history make sense of that. What is blatant? That he did it at all. So did all the examples I offered. You do it, or you don't. "Blatant" is a measureless qualifier. Mesaurement is science. Blatancy is,,, in the eye of the beholder. Something like beauty, yeah?

You know he’s in clear violation of the constitution, don’t play stupid.

You have merely made the claim that Trump violates the Constitution, as most of the left pundits who are supposed to know and demonstrate by evidence, but don't. I'll admit the right often does the same - it's pure political politics, which is not a science by any measure. That's the problem. Academia calls politics a science, but I've yet to see the evidence in 70+ years. They merely, as you, claim such. Such as the claim of 30k Trump lies. I see no list of lies to substantiate the claim. Never have. Never will. I see Psychology Today saying 30k lies in one year is about average. We [all of us] lie by nature, for all kinds of reasons.

Show me, don't tell me. How stupid is that, play or otherwise?

I forgot nothing. The discussion is not about Punter Cokehead, or Hilarious Balloon Girl, or Biden's "I'm. running for U.S. Senate," in 2020, and again in 2024.

Oh, by the way, you claim. Trump ignores the validity of our electoral process. Dead he? Show me the stastute that prohibits questioning election results.

And,by the way, Kamalala is campaigning to change our electoral process, not realizing that the Electoral College has a wider reepresentive election result than does the so-called "popular vote" because more states are required, statistically, to elect a president by electoral colllege than by pop vote. But, she doesn't know that and has not researched it, either. Just offers more word salad.

If your God was real he wouldn't need YOU to argue his existence.

No, because ytou assume a "perfectly loving God" would force our belief in His existence. That argument fails since force [coercion] would not align with

His perfect love.

2. If a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur.

This does not follow simply because a perfectly loving God would allow man's free agency, not withdraw it to jealously force our belief.

Starting a war without congressional approva

Oh? Then tell me why Democrats never seriously suggested Truman be removed for Korea, Kennedy for Vietnam; Johnson for escalating Vietnam and expanding to Laos, Cambodia and Dominican Republic; Carter to Iran, Clinmton to Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Iraq & Sudan; Obama to Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria.

Blatant corruption

For which Pelosi lobbed an impeachment [twice], which the Senate denied and acqitted.

putting the military in American cities

See the 1807  Insurrection Act [1807], which is an explicit exception to the Posse Comitatus Act

I could go on but there’s no point, 

So can I, my friend, for the same reason...

Virtrually nothing. Oh, they claim they are:

1. Establishing a dedicated task force...
2. Developing mechanisms...
3. Security Council resollutions...

Wow! Such action. Unfortunatly, I read these direct quotes from the UN as nothing more than talk-talk-say-nothing. Something the UN is well-practiced doing. They pattern themselves after something like the U.S. Congress, which, for being a third-leg of US government, manages to be sorely crippled. All talk, little-to-no action.

Kind of like how socialists talk.

None of your post points to any cause to remove Trump prior to end-of-term.

Show me the crime/misdemeanor that warrants impeachment other than Dem hatred, which does not secure a criminal complaint. This is all impeacahment proceeding can constitutionally muster. That he may be disliked doesn't cut it.

Show me the cabinet member or VP who will launch the 25A. Congress has been offered opportunity to launch the 25A, but in 50 years, has not chosen to legislate their permission to do so.

Show me the report from legitimate medical opinion by actual, personal diagnosis to warrant Trump's removal for mental incapacity. You "experts" are self-made elites with little more than ex-spurt knowledge of boy scout first aid training and popularity with social media-trained idiot fans.

Show me someone who can actually shoot straight to assassinate.

There are your options, my friend, and none guaranteee an early departure.

Any medical expert of mental condition worth his salt will not offer a diagnosis of a mental condititon of a patient without personal, in-person observation, testing, and diagnosis. Doing so by remote is virtually forbidden as is remote legal diagnosis, and you know it.

That is not uniquely an observation of Christians, but I note you mention them, uniquely. Got a myopic bias?

...the foundational religious texts of Christianity.

It would take reading that text you referenced cover-to-cover, as I have, having also read other texts, such as the Quran, the Vedas, even the Wiccan Rede, by the same cover-to-cover read, as I also have, to recognize they have have similar commentary at the root.

So, as you typically rag on the Judeo=Christian rythic, one cannot avoid ragging on the othrs, as well. At the root, they're all telling much the same story.

Mind which is educated is mind which is filled, thus cant learn any more.

That is true only of a mind that has been self-limited to any further expansion when the mind has the potential of limitless knowledge. Argue for your limitations; they're yours, alone.

Trying to get into my head, yet again? Nope, this is my territory, and the Lord's, and the Holy Spirit, alone. You neither belong, nor are invited. Did I mention Christianity? Did I mention Jesus? Did I mention a religion needing government support? I've merely said elsewhere when religion had picuniary support from government up to the latter decades of the 18th century in the Colonies. So why bring these mstters up as if I did in this string? I mentioned the Holy Bible, the majority of which has not a Christian origin, does it? I've read the Greek Septugint in Greerk. Yes, the Bible has had Christianity's stamp on it for the last hundred years and more, but not by me. I respect the Tanakh. I respect the Quran. I respect the Vedas. I respect the Book of Shadows, the Rede, and the Tripitraka. I have read all, and accept much of them. But, do what you do; it's who you are.

I spend zero time/interest to investigate anime girls. There are only three women in my life who interest me: my bride, our daughter, and our granddaughter.

SatanLucy wrote:

I am a scientific expert. I observed humans for 30 years. the conclusion of my observation is that humans are dumb.

This has naught to do with science. I am a philosophy expert, in observation for 76 years. Some humans are dumb; some by preference. Some are smart by preference of education, some by willingness to be educated.

SatanLucy wrote:

Some skin colors are better than others. If I could choose, I would be a cute Japanese female born in tokyo.

Totally disagree. No skin color is any better or wo4ese than another. Only others' negative attitude about skin color is worse

Is it now time to expand the Persian Gulf? Are they really that stupid to shoot down a US Apache helicopter?

Pick any color at random; you could probably describe it in a single word, regardlessd of what the object is. It's red or green, yellow, purple... you get it. But let that object be skin, and all of a sudden, we get society twisted in knots trying to give it a demographic, count it, subdivide it, classify it, discriminate it, and either love it or hate it.

When are we going to figure out that absolutely none of us, not one in 8 billion, is either black or white, or any other "color" we've devised for skin? So, why do we try to make that distinction? It says nothing of what or who we are, and not one of us determined it in the first place, so... so what?

Demiurge is lesser God who was created as a mistake

Implying that God made a mistake. Nope, that does not happen, He being perfect in all things. Therefore, to you opening statement, I say, Ipse dixit.

"'Except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it.' I... belive without his concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builderes of Babel." - Benjamin Franklin, 1789

You will recall, since y'all profess to know the Holy Bible, how successful building Babel was, both the tower and the city surrounding it. Yeah, they were bukding more than just a tower in their pride, intending to reach heaven and take it from God. oops.

Suggest you research definitions of both a demagogue and a demaguage, including the original Greek of the combined words of the former [the latter not found in my OED] Your interpretation of its affect on Trump should direct you to another descriptive textbook.

Which AI platform do you suggest. It's not like there's just a few; there are thousands. Among those, not even 10% are likely poloitically saavy, but even so, I doubt they agree any more than we do, so, to what end? I am not into voting for a machine since I am not one, myself. I want human representation, even if they disagree, not a crowd of mechanical autocrats. After all, what else best defines disagreement but the freedom to disagree. That's dem0ocracy in a nutshell. No democracy is not the perfect system, but it's the best we have manged to create so far...

Being forced to be good accomplishes nothing, which is why Satan's plan fails.. That's why were were given free agency, even if that risks our not going to heaven. So the problem of evil ism itself, a problem of logic. It isn't.

A or B is few keystrokes than boolean.

Dopamine is free, produced by the brain at zero cost, since we provide nutrients to the body anyway through the pie hole.