fauxlaw

It lasted about 10 minutes. Basically some girl messaged me, strongly implied she wants relationship, we exchanged just a few messages, I asked her if she likes head pats and tickling, and she said yes to head pats and no to tickling, then out of nowhere she just blocks me and writes on her account that I cheated on her.

All that; several messages, with multiple people, over 10 minutes?

No, no relationship develops in 600 seconds. That stretches the meaning of "relationship" beyond credibility. A "relationship" is said to have 5 Cs: Communication, Commitment, Compassion, Compromise, Compatibility. These require much longer than 10 minutes to develop sufficient to call it "relationship." What you had was a sixth term, which is required for a relationship, but does not sufficiently define it: Contact.

Yes, I am familiar with Jean-Francois Champollion and the Rosetta Stone translation. It was his work that inspired my desire to learn ancient Egyptian grammar, having studied French in high school and college [and living there a few years] and Greek in college.

However, the ratio of the number of people who are fluent [read/write] in Egyptian hieroglyphs is no better than about 1:1M. Just not that many people are sufficiently curious to acquire the facility, mainly because it is a dead language. I was curious, anyway. A.I. does not help, mainly because the ratio of people who can write code to educate A.I. and are fluent Egyptologist's is a significantly lower ratio, maybe something like 1:500M. My experience, to date, with people who assume they can do both is dismal, as Sidewalker's example demonstrates.

some English to Hieroglyphics translator I Googled.

What's laughable, my friend, is that admission. Just what do you think drives some online, Googled [which, itself, is A.I.] English translator to hieroglyphs? A.I., that's what, which fails miserably when the English phrase contains a modern idiom not even intelligibly translated into French [for example] with syntaxal accuracy. And you expect it to stretch to antiquity?

There are a few problems with your string of Egyptian hieroglyphs. making it apparent this is a Chat GPT construct, or some other AI disaster. There are 20 total characters in your string [you may think there are 22, but two sets, #'s 13/14, and 15/16 are really intended to be two-character ligatures, which are infrequently used in Egyptian, but they do occur. So, by the characters in your sequence: 

[1] [S29] should be a single line as shown at left to match all other characters in your string, not an outline, unless all other characters are also outlines. No ancient scribe, nor modern Egyptologist would or should blend the two styles.

[2] Characters 2,4,5,6,8 & 9, [X1, V31, N17, Aa1, Aa1] should not be represented by baselines that wander up and down within the vertical space occupied by those characters. They should be either all grounded on a common baseline, or a common line roughly in the vertical middle of the rest of the characters. There are further characters violating this rule, but those identified are sufficient to demonstrate lack of proper writing.

[3] Character 4 [V31] is backward. There are rules in ancient Egyptian of reading direction, and the characters face one direction if read left-to-right, or another direction R-to-L. All other characters face appropriately for L-to-R. They face to left if read L-to-R. An educated ancient scribe or modern Egyptologist would know this. The handle of the basket of V31 is to the right, therefore, to be read R-to-L, but the balance of the string is read L-R.

[4] Some characters, for compaction of space, should be stacked, such as #5/6 [N29, Aa1], one over the other, and minimized I'm size, or squeezed to fit in the vertical space. There are 3 other examples in this string.

As it happens, character [16], is a proper ligature.

Characters 18, 19 [G4, G1], in order, a buzzard and a vulture, do not appear together as represented here to form any word in ancient Egyptian. They are similar in appearance, and easy to confuse, but no skilled scribe would combine these two characters because of their distinct usage patterns. Two vultures together [G1] is, however, a common pairing. However, the previous 4 characters of the string do not form any ancient Egyptian word, or words in combination with the last characters. It's possible your two [18, 19] characters are really a vulture [G1] and a falcon [G5], but the same conditions as above are for this combination, as well.

S29 X1 V31 N29 Aa1 G4 G1 G5

Old Chinese proverb: when the finger points to the moon, the unlearned child looks at the finger.

Protest? Is that all you've got?

A Lie, far more than “Vice,  

Is a monster of so frightful mien

As to be hated needs but to be seen;

Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,

We first endure, then pity, then embrace.”

My boys repeat! My hometown shines again, the City of Night! Thankis, guys.

By the texts oft three documents within the current Constitution [Article II, 12A, & 22A]:

Article II does not speak to a limit of 4-year terms an elected president may serve.

12A does not speak to a limit of 4-year terms an elected president may serve.

22A: an elected president may not serve more than 2 four-year terms, however, there is no prohibition of a president who has served two 4-year terms to run for election as vice president, nor, as an elected vice president, succeed the presidential office by incapacity of the president by death, temp or permanent disability or removal from office by impeachment/conviction. Further, should a presidential election not give a majority E.C. vote to a pres candidate, and the election goes to the House [per 12A, clause 1], and a House member vote does not elect a president, the current vice ores shall be the president, and the v.p candidate receiving the most votes shall be the VP. Then, if the President, by death, disability, or removal vacates the presidency, as before, the VP shall be the President.

Bottom line, B. Clonton, Bush 43, Obama, or Trump are eligible to run as a VP candidate in 28, and potentially win election.

nope

"here" can also be interpreted as this site, and not just the thread. No, you should have stuck, and stopped with your first line of #52:

I can see I needed to be more specific.

Amen.

It is not injustice, but ignorance of the knowledge of what women and men are, and are not. Interchangeablity, but by a headtrip, is in the not column.

I know ghosts, spirits of the dead, are among us, perhaps in a dimensional shift, but that shift has nexuses with our dimension. My experience is only partially visual, but more directly olfactory, and occurred in November of 2001. My father-in-law, a man I highly respected and admired, lay dying in a hospital bed, in the week of Thanksgiving, which we now approach. One evening around 19:00, I stopped on my way home from work to visit with him, and found him in his private room, asleep, peaceful, with the covers up to his chin and both arms outside the covers at rest by his body. I could see him breathing evenly, so I knew he was alive. The overhead light was out; just the dim, indirect lighting behind him on the wall gave any light in the room. It was very peaceful, and I sat at his bedside, hoping he might wake up. Suddenly, without warning, he raised both arms above him and curled them together, then released and lowered his arms to the bed. He repeated this action several times, and I could not imagine what he was doing, but he continued making the gesture over and over again. Then just as suddenly, I smelled a familiar aroma - the basement of his mother, my bride's grandmother, with whom I was familiar, because I was dating my bride, when in college, and she lived with her grandmother for a time, She did serious quilting in the basement of her home, with fabric and such all over, which carried a particular scent with which I became familiar. That was the aroma I could smell now, and it signaled me that Leon's mother was with us. As he continued his curious arm gestures, I realized he was hugging people, including his mother, and I felt the room was filling with many people, gone on before, now greeting this great and gracious man. The room was getting crowded, and though I believed I was allowed to witness this congregation of spirits surrounding my father-in-law, and welcoming him home, I knew I no longer belonged there, and quietly left the room. He passed the following day in the presence of his wife, who came to live with us after selling her home, and we cared for her until her passing just two years ago. IN our home, I have felt several times that he was there, looking over our mother, assuring we were caring for her.

The magazine claimed that men today are better at being women than women are, which is biologically absurd, in spite of how "woman" is defined by wokeness, let alone "identity." "Woke," as any rational person knows, is dead, and it always was linguistically rooted in the past tense, anyway. As for "identity,"at least by gender, which ought to be, and always has been a simple matter, that's the biological purpose of this post.

Trans claims that identity choice [a head trip] can change the gender, but biology claims that gender is not in the brain, as a matter of choice, but in the gonads [ovaries or testes], and not even by a vagina or a penis, which is, admittedly, the means by which a newborn is virtually always declared female or male by the ObGyn when birthing a child. The biological fact is, gender is defined by the 23rd chromosome, which, in 99.99999997% of humanity, is XX or XY [female or male] and that is within every single one of our 20 - 30T cells of the body in the nucleus on the DNA double-helix, and in order to "identify" as the opposing sex to what the cells all declare, one must have each cell surgically altered, and not merely by verbal or written declaration of preferred pronoun use. This is science of generations of knowledge, and still is. Note that I said 99.99...% and not 100%. That is because 0.00000003% of us worldwide [about 500 people, total, or <3 people per country - that's how rare this condition truly is] have variations of XX or XY, but even they, even if they have both a vagina and a penis, have only ovaries or testes, one set to a customer, and that is not changed by whim of declared "identity." And the genetics identity is not going to be changed by any biological treatment. One can refer to the Human Genome Project for the most modern scientific background on the subject, and that is a generation ago when that knowledge was declared. Where have y'all been, including Glamour Mag?

...it is it technically barred? No. So as usual with Trump, we now have to sit here and...

Direct quote from your first post in this string, #29. Seems I did take note, and you do "invoke Trump."

Your stupidity and unseriousness here is yet another example of how perfectly you align with MAGA. [your #42]

I wasn’t suggesting that you were stupid, I was calling your argument stupid... [your #46]

Anyone reading your #42 with a modicum of English grammar skill is going to interpret your 42 as directed to me, not to my argument, since you do not mention my "argument" in that sentence, nor in the entire post, but mention me specifically twice just in that sentence.

For now, yes, it does. Never said it doesn't. But, that is going to change, because Satan is not in ultimate control, and never will be. God allows Satan his limited share of free will [for example, we have the power to will him gone from us, ifwe choose to employ it], as well as we are offered it to its fullest extent, and always have been.

Also documented [and logical] is that personal responsibility [or lack of same] in healthcare is largely responsible for our health, simply by what we decide to put in the pie hole, or otherwise introduce into our bodies by our individual choices, good and bad. Healthcare cost is, therefore, controlled largely by our own, individual good or poor choices. "Pie-hole choices" are the majority percentage of causes of heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, the three most significant health nemeses humanity faces. And that has noting to do with government funding legislation.

My only point was the lack of exclusivity [dementia affecting only the aged]. Variance of percentage of those affected among groups is acknowledged

There is zero redeeming value to anything Satan proposes. mostly because all Satan does is oppose, not propose.

Yes, Satan can tell the truth, and often does. The fault therein is that truth is used by Satan as a hook that has the singular objective of deception to drag us to think and do evil things.

The Democrat Senator mud-sticking of demanding healthcare for illegal aliens in-country [which is exactly illegal, all by itself, regardless of other crimes that may be committed by them] as well as all other demands for added government expenditure that is not currently funded, and for which there are no justifications for funding according to the limitations of legislation of government spending by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution is going to lead to a fatal airliner crash before they stop the nonsense of Shoofly's shutdown.

The condition of incapacity by dementia or undue influence from others can affect any age group, not merely the elderly. To think otherwise is the unjust attitude of group-think.

What point is there to proposing a fantasy?

Go.

 if people past age 35 werent allowed to vote...

Which is why if/then 'logic' isn't, because the 'if' statement is virtually always currently not true, and therefore cannot justify the 'then' statement.

That's a pitiful path to logic.

You don't need to try so hard to sell your argument that all old people are tech-dummies. Unquestioned and repeated misinformation can be more harmful than acknowledged ignorance. 

You may believe I am stupid all you wish if that floats your boat. But personal attack is always the losing argument, my friend, for it demonstrates lack of any meaningful argument.

I never made Trump the featured president of my original post on this subject. Others did that, like Dble-R and Sidewalk, so tell them.

Thanks, but our time together is already > 24/6 considering there are a few hours each week apart, but more than most couples, I'll wager. We like being together, pure and simple. You find a clock that gives mores than 24 hours in a day, I'll buy it. If we could, we'd move to Venus, whose day is > 5,800 hours; 18 hours longer than its full year.

and...?

Why are you pretending

Nope, I've identified 4 living 2-term presidents who are eligible to the conditions my original question poses.

That's you, Dbl, who impersonates pretending one man fills the bill. The original sin is to limit the scope of open questions.

We have never before...

Been around that long, to experience all 47 presidents? Congrats.