fauxlaw

Reluctant Fed Chair Powell admits to seeing the light shining ointhe darkness of Democrat self-serving election autopsy. Self-serving because they think they can sing the blues away, but they're off key, cannot encourgage more voices than a quartet, if that, and, of course, blame anyone but themselves fort the 24 election loss. That's a posts mortem. that, like woke, was dead, is dead, and will now remain dead.

Maybe they can buy fake Dracula teeth and try to scare us again. Nope.

Powel has seen the light of Tump's four-star plan: tax cuts, deregulation, energy dominance, and fair trade. The combination may spell threat of tarries, because that, most of all, the toothy Democrats claimed would be our demise. My gold and sliver investments are doing just fine, thanks. Funny thing, these four stars were once a mantra sung but none other than JFK. Remember him, Democrats? You should. You're probably to blame for shooting him, if all the the hidden games were released to hate public. Face it, your ilk [far-left Dems] in the 60s [and was there] did not like him. At all. Just like Trump. History repeats, we learn nothing. Santayana called that "among savages, infancy is perpetual."

According to MI5 [Great Britain's Secret Service] Hitler and Eva Braun's last day alive in the Berlin bunker they occupied for a few weeks before both committed suicide was low key, with Hitler makings no public announcements. He announced to a secretary that he preferred death to be taken alive. There were, at the time, 2.5M Russian soldiers in Berlin, fighting tor take the city. Just before death, the two married in the map room of the bunker, hada brief party and secluded themselves to die. They may not have even consumated the marriage. Therefore, what legit comparison to Trump?

Me? Always.

Nice claim of an old myth, but according to FactCheck.org, that's what it is: a myth.

https://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/was-hillary-clinton-the-original-birther/

Their investigation revealed that Trump did not start the birther movement against Oba'a, and neither did either Hillaryous Balloon Girl, nor her official Campaign. Nope. It started in early 2008 by desperate Hillaryous supporters, afraid that Oba'a would run away with the nomination, and needed something to defeat his effort.

Trump never mentioned anything about running for president in 2008 until late in the year in October as a 3rd party candidate. H started an exploratory committee to see about feasibility. He ultimately decided before the election that it was too early [and too late] to run in 2008, All this was known in late 2008. Where were you, only catching up now, but incorrectly?

Wow, took too long of a look in the mirror this morning, huh?

Today, I am celebrating Bauhaus, the minimalist "less-is-more" architectural design of Germany, and adherent designer, Marcel Brewer [a Hungarian], who 100 years ago, designed the "Wassily chair" pictured below. I have 4 of these chairs arranged in my home office. While appearing uncomfortable, people love sitting in this chair, mainly because of the rugged strength of the chair while offering flexible leather comfort.

If that's your view of it, go with it. Frankly, I did not mention that word, did I?

So what?

And you have answered. Didn't have to, did you? So, who's obsessed?

You are totally missing the point that previous to man, the Earth's atmosphere has had far more CO2 [along with other "greenhouse gasses" in it than now, simply by volcanism, and that our ancestral mammalian creatures, prev-man, but with physiological systems like ours, survived. I ask, therefore, what existential threat a lesser amount of GGs now presents? No one wants to address that question with any rational response. Just up-in-the-night climate change.

My burial ritual point was simply that modern man does not to contribute to the organic goo that is the continue production of petroleum crude.

The Democrats havre been trying to eradicate Trump for 11 years; ever since he announced his interest in running for the presidency after NBC fired him from "The Apprentice."

Or, was that really directive from DNC? NBC never has had solid self-identity ever since the Huntley-Brinkley Report on evening news in mid-60s.

The inheritor of that honest news cycle was Mess-NBC, who's identity has just changed to NBC-NOW. They say it is News-Opinion-World, but that really is Not One Word [unless it's directed from DNC]

Yes, it is powerful. 100%

Are you ignoring the news of today, that appears to render a different approach on what really happened in the 2020 election? As usual, history has its flaws when first noted, and that presence of flaw seems to have increased since 24-hour news cycles have matured, even from just 4 years ago. And, yes, one word in an entire speech of over 1 hour's length does have predominance when the subject is violence at the Capitol. Again, in spite of the left's take on it, not a single conviction of over 800 trials has resulted for "insurrection," yet the left continues to use that one word, for just a little longer than an hour speech. Try 4 YEARS, going on 5, my friend. Really, this "get Trump at any cost" has been gong on since the summer of 2014, when NBC fired Trump from "The Apprentice" when he announced he might run in the next presidential election. Who's propaganda and provocation carries a grudge?

I turned 19 in September 1968, and on 1/1/1969, arrived in France for a two-year sojourn. Sharon was killed later that year, and I read about the Manson murders the day after it happened from a newspaper article, without much detail until several days later.

A very good summary. I agree, completely, but I have not lived there since end of December, 1968.

That's Hollowood for you. We're talking about Brentwood. Different town. And that's why much of "Hollywood" lived in Brentwood.

though cogito ergo sum is Latin.

About 60% of English is rooted in Latin.

And oil reserves are the result of climate change, long ago.

Nope, regardless of climate, organic matter decomposes and becomes petroleum crude, and we have no idea how long that process takes [we estimate millions of years, but, to date, no one has proven the duration of the process], but it's been happening since there was first organic material that went to ground, land or sea, simply by death. And that process did not suddenly end just to make a convenient "climate change" argument. We do not have li tied reserves in the ground; and we keep discovering new reserves all the time. That is a change change argument of absurdity. There is no other animal on Earth that treats their dead by putting them in a box, separating them from the natural environment. Several other species mourn their dead, and some do engage in burial of a sort, but none to the degree humans do now. We used to not even use a box. What, pray tell, made you think petroleum is not organic? AlGore's "Inconvenient Truth?" Nat Geo? NOAA? Nonsense.

I grew up in Brentwood, a suburb of L.A., in the same neighborhood and just around the corner from our house, where, after after or before they married [I don't recall which] Roman and Sharon either purchased or rented the home wherever Sharon and her unborn we're slaughtered. I was acquainted with many Hollowood types, behind and in front of the camera, who lived in Brentwood. It was an upscale town. What can I say; this was my childhood and adolescence. To me, they we're ordinary people who happened to work in a different industry than many do.

Your first post, @#30, in this string:

Why do Trump apologists continue to push this narrative that his rhetoric prior to 1/6 was peaceful?

Because, my friend, the actions taken by the DoJ prior to 1/6 were never addressed by any indictment of Trump, or anyone else in his former admin, but from 1/6, forward.

But, your own, first question in your post #30 in this staring denies a correct interpretation of the context by definition of Trump's use of one word: "Fight," in his 1/6 speech, which is not to be interpreted as as a violent suggestion.

I think one of the culture-shift milestones occurred in 1972 when Helen Reddy, a woman, released her song, "I am Woman," with the lyric, "I am woman, hear me roar." Set back the feminine archetype by 50 years. And this year, we are introduced to men's face cream via "Particle," which has sufficiently masculine pkg, but the whole TV ad is skin texture; a definitive female hotspot. It's funny, because I think most of the "before" photos look better for men than the "after."

Agreed, this could go poorly either way.

Wrong yet again. Face the music. You're singing off-key

Nope. The popman was not around in the 13th century BCE, approximately when this was first said

Bla bal bla. Want more:

If the data were out of NASA, I might be more inclined to believe it, but the governing agency of NOAA [National Oceanic & Atmospheric Organization], according to annual reports since 1997, is NOAA is overseen not by any scientific organization of scholastic repute, but by the Department of Commerce. Yahooo! There's "science" for you. As I said, just existing to line pockets with climate change propaganda. Nope I don't believe the data is anywhere close to accurate. I virtually guarantee those taking measurements are not using the same equipment, worldwide, and that's just one of the 9 criteria I gave thou. Not trained by the same techniques, either, I'll wager. Calibration? That's just pathetic.

I know, I've been three to observe how poorly that is trained and executed, even within the same organization, let alone with them scattered around the world.

The most significant two-word philosophy ever uttered. No, it was not first uttered by Decartes.

There is no "race." Both image selections ignore the fact.

The commentary ignores that humanity is greater than skin deep, and the depth is beyond both images and commentary.

I accept we view differing cultures, but culture is neither racial nor sexually based while being innocently creative.

While perhaps provocative, the poster only succeeds in maligning both parties.

Overrated suddenly becomes worthy of contempt? Who among us in America, including Lincoln, was and is perfect? Lincoln would tell us, including himself, that no one is.

The logo comparative of old and new Cracker Barrel reveals some interesting notions. "Cracker Barrel needs to feel like the Cracker Barrel for today and for tomorrow – the things that you love are still there," said C.B. CEO, Julie Masino a few days ago. Well, she didn't mention, and apparently no longer loves, herself, the C.B of yesterday, which happens to exemplify its root as a farming theme: the seated man, dressed in bibbed coveralls, is the classic farmer, and the ignorance of that deletion and its representation tells me the C.B. of "today and tomorrow" warts to separate from that image.

I have never eaten at Cracker Barrel, and, now, never plan to do so. Don't know where one is near me, in any event. But I continue to do my own farrming, thanks. Otherwise, this post5ed subject appears t5o be just another trump Tryump exercise, and I see no legit purpose in that. I'm an Indie, not a MAGA, but, I mean, why can't y'all leave the guy alone? He's managed to overcome every get-Trump exercise in existence, and failure breeds contempt, once again.