wylted

I will be checking in routinely and am open to persuasion between now and dp end so if a vote is needed nobody worry that I can't help.

I don't buy Rubio as a closet homo. Yes to Vance and yes to Graham. I mean I buy it but I see no evidence. 2016 primary opponents could be a thing though

I am okay with Kohai but don't feel to strongly so I am ears and I legitimately don't buy that Trump gas to be town or is even true.

unvote VTL kohai

I think there's also a Filipino boy version of Epstein who has Rubio and Lindsey Graham on his list.

Graham is funny. He legitimately has huge swagger every time Trump is in office. He basically acted like a loser until the political tide shifted and Trump showed Republicans how to fight.

Scum team could be people on the Epstein client list so keeping my vote shinning

Tiny hands himself. I bet your dick looks big in dick pics with your hands next to it, but I know you have a regular size dick.

Time for a full claim

unbote VTL shining

I’m a current US Senator fron TexasI think it should be quite obvious who I amnot comfortable full claiming my role at this stage yet

Lying Ted. So why should we believe a known liar and somebody Trump named lying Ted is town

Is he on your scum list? If not why vote him? If yes why would him speaking change him being scum?

4 votes is a little too close for comfort and he should have a chance 2 talk. Idk i don’t like how willing kohai put him so close to a lynch either

Genius fucking philosophy. Scum can escape lynches by being silent. I'm sure this won't incentivize inactivity or anything

unvote VTL magaroth

Yeah MAGAroth is acceptable though I prefer shining

unvote VTL Maga

You voted for him in post 55 and he edited post 57

This is all just contradicting what people said to appear like you are scum hunting and also it looks like Thoth is town from associative tells as well

Hi

I am so confident I. This i am looking for associative tells now and if we go by associative tells white flame is town. I will look for more as I iso her posts

It's not a gut read but she is sticking out as scum to me.reread her posts and see if she is scum hunting or just commenting on other people's analysis by randomly contradicting them in tiny ways to generate conversation and appear to be scum hunting.

She's pretty obviously scum here behaviorally. I'm pretty confident here and I think any experienced player who isolates her posts prior to this moment and reads them will also have a scum read on her.

I am like 90% sure that banana is scum I don't want to put a lot of effort into corralling you guys and since we have no good choices other than her let's just lynch her.

unvote VTL banana

She always folds to pressure so we will immediately know if she's scum once we get three votes on her. Might as well do it

I did just read where he explained it a bit after I wrote that post so it's out dated, you can ignore the part where I criticize him not sharing

Mind kill was auto corrected from mod kill

Not sure how it makes him more likely to be scum. He's calling attention to himself and potentially resulting in a mod kill.

If you can't follow my train of thought that's fine. I will try to elucidate it though.

In retrospect it calls more attention to him and threatens a mind kill.

We are dealing with States of mind and state of mind in the moment doesn't have that sort of retrospective.

The way I am imagining his mind working. "I said something scummy, so let me erase it before anyone notices"

Then maybe in the moment he thinks "if somebody noticed that post changed it sure looks scummy, so he issues a statement to acknowledge his actions"

This is a possible interpretation of his actions and his state of mind while performing those actions. I am also starting to consider a new train of thought though related.

Let's assume he's honest and he edited fluff. What's the point of editing fluff? Maybe he thinks that posting fluff makes him look scummy. Now he erases it, and while it is possible that town doesn't want to appear scummy I think it's more common for scum to be worried about that sort of thing.

Now there could be alternative explanations but Thoth hasn't shared his prior state of mind. He hasn't stated why he edited his post or why he even cares that it's a bit fluffy when half of us have posted fluff about the tensions in Iran.

Thoth does have a duty to give an explanation for these things that only he can know because only he has access to his state of mind, but he has merely just been dismissive of his own actions.

They want to policy lynch me because I edited a post, even though it was a joke that had nothing to do with the game

What was the joke, and why erase it?

It does bother me a bit that you seem to be self conscious about posting fluff. Why is that something that would make you self conscious?

Do you think he's likely to have done this as scum, or do you just think he should be punished for stepping over that line?

Stepping over a line but also I do think he is marginally more likely to do this as scum. I have had an urge to do it as scum in situations where I thought I could do it before anyone noticed just from not being careful with my words. What is he like 2/9 to be scum. That sort of thing may make him 3/9 to be scum in my opinion

He edited his post and I am more willing to forgive a new player. Kohai had his vote on him prior to the edit

Ref, Thoth,

Assume I have a problem with my working memory to the extent I can't remember shit either of you has said. Why are we voting Kohai?

I could help with a lynch with other than Thoth, but I have literally had zero feedback about my questions on any other name I would know Thoth as or his/her/theys experience

My character isn't a lawyer nor has ever been. I don't want to get too narrow but there was an incident they are somewhat adjacent to that pisses off my libertarian instincts involving a legal or lawyer thing

You should apply to be Trump's speechwriter

Yeah there is no more infuriating thing I assume. You sit there and write some stuff like.

"We need to secure the border to protect citizens from mostly peaceful immigrants but who often times have bad elements use them for cover"

And see him say "they aren't sending their best, their sending rapists"

I would fucking shoot myself

"so the theme split may be just dems vs repubs like thoth and wylted suggested,"

I never suggested this. Usually I ignore these statements but I have found for whatever reason if statements like this go unchallenged then people end up believing them, especially if any discussions pop up around them.

Intercepted messages from Iran have the people just acknowledging that they will die and are okay risking their lives and experiencing huge losses in their fight for freedom

They are banking 100% on outside intervention.