I actually ran all his thread-ending non-sequiturs through AI analysis, and the AI said the responses were generally designed to end the discussion. Objectively, if you scroll through every category, nearly every thread has ended on a Debby non-sequitur conversation-ending post.
What would be hilarious is if someone programmed an AI bot to compete with the Debby AI program for thread-ending non-sequiturs. The traffic and slop spam would be off the charts.
I actually ran all his thread-ending non-sequiturs through AI analysis, and the AI said the responses were generally designed to end the discussion. Objectively, if you scroll through every category, nearly every thread has ended on a Debby non-sequitur conversation-ending post.
What would be hilarious is if someone programmed an AI bot to compete with the Debby AI program for thread-ending non-sequiturs. The traffic and slop spam would be off the charts.
Were the thread ending posts from Debby using AI or Debby organic posts? Bc if they were organic human posts, maybe our man Debby should stick to AI generated posts
Debby is a bot. It's programmed to make up to 30 thread-ending non-sequiturs within 2 minutes, and checks every hour, 24 hours a day.
Who would spend time making something like that for this website?
So Debby is not on trial. AI is on trial or AI conspiracy bot.
Debby is a bot. It's programmed to make up to 30 thread-ending non-sequiturs within 2 minutes, and checks every hour, 24 hours a day.
As long as it drives activity, I dont care. Its not like we are even getting new members. Site was close to dead after debby's ban. Lets not pretend you all want to be more active, but debby wont let you. Youtube, tik tok... have bunch of bots too, but plenty of activity there.
Let the truth be known. Debby is not a bot or a spoiler.
3o4
Three out of 4 (3o4) of your posts are spoilers. Get your act together.
And yes, it's one of those word association things, whereby sequitur instantly becomes squitter.
And so non-sequitur becomes a hard stool.
You need a comfy chair Shoresy.
I often wonder how many people take in their grandmothers old milking stool, when asked to provide a stool sample.
You just pointed to one. You asked him to get his grandmothers old milking stool together a stool sample.
Yes, hard to avoid.
Or unavoidably hard.
Did you get his stool sample or it took him ( 3o4) three out of four attempts to get it.
Constipation is not good.
So all his attempts to provide a stool sample failed because of his constipation.whats next? Grandma’s ladle.
No, her laxative remedies.
She taught you how to cook too. Wow,
I've never met Shorsey's Grandma.
Though I am quite a competent cook...Skills that I picked up from various data sources.
I never really knew my Grandma's, as both died when I was very young.
Guess you are on your own to extract his stool sample. Having Grandma would have helped.
I wonder if anyone as ever turned up at a surgery with a wooden stool after being asked to provide one.
Is there any connection between a stool and a stool?
Why not say it for what it is...A shit sample...Or poo...Why a stool.?
Faeces would be too technical.
You get to call it what you want because you are the one handling it.
I will call it theism then...Such is a human waste product.
You built a church based on human waste products. You haven’t found a name for it, yet.
Indeed.
