Why does every MAGA woman look like a lot lizard that's been beamed up to the mothership to be given two hits of the ole ovipositor to the face? What is going on here? Why are these otherwise attractive (or not, in Loomer's case) women transforming themselves into, to quote our Eternal Leader, 'horrorshows'?
The swamp consumes all.
those women are expired.
Once a woman is over 25, she is just expired and no man with high standards wants her.
Woman: I am 30. Will you date me?
Me: Sorry, I am not desperate.
It's actually 23.
For me, its 25. In other words, I would still agree to fuck a 24 year old woman, even tho I consider her close to being expired. And it seems that women know this too. I see many stories of women who say they feel expired after reaching certain age and no longer getting attention from men. Naturally, men seek younger women. there are some degenerate men who seek women their own age, but those are not majority. I would never date a 30 year old woman because I know that she was used many times by many men, and now has emotional baggage with her and probably bunch of mental issues. I know that women past age 30 lower their standards, so even if you arent very hot man, if you approach a single woman who is above 30, she will hold onto you because she is single and knows she wont get much more opportunities. Young women get a lot of guys hitting on them, and they can keep standards high. Women who are 30 or worse, 35, have almost no men hitting on them, let alone men willing to marry them.
this is because women have logically screwed themselves over. Younger women prefer older men, and this seems to be almost universal, and this leaves a bunch of young men single. However, young men dont prefer older women. So once woman becomes older, she has no access to young men, and old men her age are dating younger women. And younger men just wait till they become older men to date younger women.
So younger women have literally screwed their older self over by prefering older men, and maybe older women would have some chance if younger men prefered older women, but most dont.
Younger women -> Older men
Younger men -> they wait till they become older men, so they can date younger women
Who will older women date in this scheme?
Hmmmm,
Rethinking your allegiance or gonna go back, stay brainwashed and deflect?
US white ethnonationalism backs the primary invasive ethnicity of US subjucating all others. It disenfranchises the indigenous tribes, the foundational black descendants of the slaves that helped massively to build Americas and confuses a violent invasive immigration established culture for being the native one of the land.
It has no true connection to Europe's concern for its indigenous being replaced. It has coopted this fear and hijacked all causes the indigenous of America had for their claim to the land. It is evil, rotten and has mr 14+ kids in vitro with multiple women emerald mine blood money inheritance billionaire Satanist Musk, Mr. 3 wives, molester and proud of it Trump, Steve Bannon and far more linked to it.
The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.
It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.
Yes, cosmetic surgery is popular, but often ill thought out.
Must be a swamp and backwoods dwelling redneck turn on though.
And pluck out your eyebrows and paint on comic ones instead...What's that all about.
They all look like they are thinking, "I wish Donald would stop grabbing my pussy every time he comes by".
That study btw was only out of men who were willing to admit it. If the Age of consent was 0 and nobody cared about your age preferences, then I could see the equalization point for women and men being way below 23.
I am willing to admit it depends a lot on the woman. Some women dont look good even when they are 18. But average woman expires very fast. Whoever told women to wait till 25 told them a big lie. Not only from nature's point of view, or biological, but fact that women depend on their looks entirely while men mostly dont. Man can be average, or even below average, and still be desirable for other qualities such as comedy or wealth. But woman is bad at everything else in life, so she fully depends on her looks. When she has no looks, no one has logical reason to like her.
RemyBrown is back and immediately pushes misogyny and lowering the age of consent to 0. This is extremely legally and morally problematic to be enabling. Just permanently ban him or something.
The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.
It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.
RemyBrown is back and immediately pushes misogyny and lowering the age of consent to 0.
Umm where did he argue to lower age of consent to 0?
I can agree that that was bit of misogyny, which isnt exactly a reason for perma ban. However, to ban him for age of consent is insane given that:
Now, he said "if age of consent was 0, this would result". that is a lot different from saying "age of consent should be 0", which I am not sure is even logically possible.
An age of consent of zero is not legally recognized anywhere; instead, laws set minimum ages (typically 14-18, with Canada at 16) to protect minors, recognizing they lack the maturity for sexual consent, though some jurisdictions have limited "close-in-age" exceptions for teens near the age limit, but never for infants or very young children. Laws exist because young minds lack decision-making capacity, and sexual contact with someone below the age of consent is considered sexual exploitation or assault, regardless of the minor's purported agreement.
Remy is already marked as offensive. Go to your profile > settings > hide offensive content if you don't want to see his posts/comments.
But then you won't see a lot of other posts and debates too
Well, seeing offensive posts and comments is the price of agreeing to see offensive posts and comments.
I dont recommend hiding offensive posts, because you are going to miss out on a lot on this site if you enable that in your profile. And this post wasnt even that offensive. Hide offensive posts is just option for people who want to see only clean version of site, so its useful for them, but probably more boring too given that offensive posts take a decent enough percentage of posts.
He shoukd not be allowed to post it, idc if I see it. It should be banned to post. Anyone can ses it by visiting this website and tapping a button.
The US is a definitively secular nation, founded on complete separation of the State and religion. The Left Wing of US realise this but don't realise that pure freedom requires as low tax and free access to guns as possible. The Right Wing of US don't realise that secular pure freedom means the LGBTQ+ and abortion agendas both end up in line with US's liberty-first ethos.
It is left-wing to be pro-life. You are backing poor babies being born at the inconvenience of the already-born. Go figure.
Anyone can see it by visiting this website and tapping a button
Yeah, if people request to see offensive posts, we will oblige them. We're not going to protect people from seeing posts that they actively seek out.
We already voted in a code of conduct, a very simple code of conduct, and I dont remember misogyny being banned in it. You cant use site to commit a crime. Misogyny in this form is not a crime, as far as I know, except maybe in some more extreme cases in Europe. I get tired from repeating this, but again, this site does not enforce laws of any random country in Europe.
"Offending religious feelings" is a crime in Poland. Yes, thats how the law is called, and yes it means exactly what it says. We are obviously not going to enforce that rule here. If we enforced laws of every European country here, there would be no any debate other than "is cereal a soup?".
Offending religious feelings (Polish: Obraza uczuć religijnych) is a blasphemy law in Poland. According to Article 196 of the Penal Code:[2] "Whoever offends the religious feelings of other persons by publicly insulting an object of religious worship, or a place designated for public religious ceremonies, is liable to pay a fine, have their liberty limited, or be deprived of their liberty for a period of up to two years."[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offending_religious_feelings_(Poland)
Poland does not separate state from religion like America does.
I mean, I dont really like when people insult religion, but I dont think someone should get 2 years in prison for that, or be punished in some way. I dont see how someone mentioning Jesus or Buddha in a bad way deserves prison. If offending religious feelings were a law in my country, I would declare myself God and anyone who insults me would go to prison. But people in Poland arent competent enough to take advantage of such ridiculous law.
That is why the government is assisting them where religion is concerned.
