Locked

Solo Leveling - Day phase 3

Started by Mikal

Replies
1,385
Posts
1,386
Page
11 / 47

Conversation

Total: 1,386
ISO #301 •••
--> @ILikePie5

This is the one bit that I am struggling with.


You keep speaking like you are in some position of power with leverage as you play with smoke and mirrors and act like you are not the one on trial here. You very simply are. And if you had a reason to play games and hide information that damns Rex or someone else you could do that.


I do not trust you and the situation has everything to do with you. Rex is not on trial imo. You are. And I very much doubt there is not a scum between You/Rex/Shining regardless but the way you are handling the situation looks very scummy to me.

Edit post

ISO #302 •••
--> @Helz

Pie’s D1 progression on mestari is really bad

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #303 •••

Hang on, why are you guys asking for my justification and not Awesome's? Anyway, mu justification is dogshit and its obvious Mikal was lazy with AI. My justification is I am silent, but I have a strong desire to win and that makes me a Lightning Rod (Its not actually a LR, mine is just single target).

Edit post

ISO #304 •••

Alright, looking back through this Pie vs. Rex situation, here's my take:


Pie is willing to put himself on the line this DP to prove that he's innocent. He's not saying "wait until you see the flip and then lynch me next DP," he's saying by the end of the DP, he should be the lynch if he can't prove it. If there's incentive for scum Pie to do that, someone please explain it to me because I sincerely have no idea what could possess him to put his ass on the line before this DP even ends. I get not understanding the push for information from Rex, but if he's that confident he can prove himself to be town, then I'm willing to explore whatever this is before he has to out.

Edit post

ISO #305 •••
--> @Shining
Hang on, why are you guys asking for my justification and not Awesome's? Anyway, mu justification is dogshit and its obvious Mikal was lazy with AI. My justification is I am silent, but I have a strong desire to win and that makes me a Lightning Rod (Its not actually a LR, mine is just single target).


Yes, that's how Lightning Rod works: you target someone and redirect all night actions directed at them to you. I've seen some other versions that work passively, but that's how the role is usually spelled out. So... you're silent and have a strong desire to win? That's it? And that makes you the Lightning Rod somehow?


Also, we have gotten Awesome's justification, which was the whole "Airmax invested in the site" line he brought up earlier.

Edit post

ISO #306 •••
--> @Helz
What I am trying to avoid is the basic line of a player claiming a red check. Then Pie demanding specifics so they can go "Oh, well your alignment cop is wrong because I have a miller function" or "Your tracker result is wrong because I was swapped last night" etc.

Pie directly claiming if they visited and who at the very least is a step in the right direction. I am not even asking what they did or what their role is. 


I told you that I’m not a miller and idk if I was swapped.

Edit post

ISO #307 •••
--> @Mestari
Pie is claiming that someone in Rex's guild interfered with the results. If he claims Miller after asking if anyone in the guild knew about the investigation, we lynch him. We are trying too hard to be fancy here.


Exactly, it’s not hard

Edit post

ISO #308 •••
My entire issue centers around the fact I can not place myself in Pies shoes and understand a town motive.


I know you can’t. It’s because you don’t have the full story. I do. But what’s my scum motivation here lol. He’s already a claimed Cop. And I’m telling you with 100% certainty that I’m innocent.


They feel they can prove themselves. Ok.. sure? But why refuse to reveal bits of information that nail down their potential of defense if they are this totally confirmable townie?


Because I’m 100% confirmable. REF isn’t.


Then there is demanding a full claim from Rex. Why a full claim? Why not specifically ask for the information about the peek? It would slightly make sense if they thought Rex was lying but they have openly said they do not. This is a very weird stance that also does not make sense for town.


I need the full facts. Prima facie I believe REF, but I need all the details


Now they are going after Rex's guild members. What would that possibly have to do with them if they are some confirmed townie that can prove themselves? The only thing that does is shade the potential that they were framed in some way.


Again, this is above you. Find a scum motivation for me to do this lol


To be blunt I am not able to put myself in their shoes and say "As town this makes sense to do" in multiple respects. While I can place myself in their shoes and say "As scum this absolutely makes sense"

Thats my take.


And it’s garbage lol

Edit post

ISO #309 •••
--> @Helz
None of these factors make sense to me questioning if Pie is town while they all make sense for a scum play. Im calling them out to push for pressure that Pie outs information before demanding information thats potentially damaging to the town (and serves no purpose to solve Pie) for Rex to out.


It actually does.

Edit post

ISO #310 •••
--> @Helz
This is the one bit that I am struggling with.

You keep speaking like you are in some position of power with leverage as you play with smoke and mirrors and act like you are not the one on trial here. You very simply are. And if you had a reason to play games and hide information that damns Rex or someone else you could do that.


I do have the position of power cause I know I am 100% confirmable and will be by the end of the DP. I don’t have to fake it. I know.


I do not trust you and the situation has everything to do with you. Rex is not on trial imo. You are. And I very much doubt there is not a scum between You/Rex/Shining regardless but the way you are handling the situation looks very scummy to me. 


And I’m telling you that I need the full picture from REF. For the record though I do think Shining is scum


Edit post

ISO #311 •••
--> @Shining
Hang on, why are you guys asking for my justification and not Awesome's? Anyway, mu justification is dogshit and its obvious Mikal was lazy with AI. My justification is I am silent, but I have a strong desire to win and that makes me a Lightning Rod (Its not actually a LR, mine is just single target).


😂😂😂😂

Edit post

ISO #312 •••
--> @ILikePie5

I think shinning is fully outted

Edit post

"Kohai, your entrance to the thread was legendary, you had a solve and a winning PoE right when you showed up, super impressive stuff, even more so considering it wasn't even your objective!!" - Zrein

ISO #313 •••

VtL Shining

Edit post

ISO #314 •••

VOTE COUNT


Awesome5000 (2/7): Shining, Mag1c

Pie (2/7): Rex, Helz

Shinning (2/7): Kohai, Pie


Edit post

ISO #315 •••
--> @whiteflame

Mafiauniverse says it redirects everyone on to you.

Edit post

ISO #316 •••
--> @Shining

It actually doesn't: https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/database/mafia-roles/role/?mafiarole=Lightning%20Rod


But it also doesn't really matter. The role isn't the problem. The justification is just... wow.

Edit post

ISO #317 •••

VTL Pie


Sorry, I'm too used to Pie's ways. He's a slippery bastard as scum and always pleads for more time. Shining is definitely the lynch here based on the feebleness of his claim, so if Pie has a way to prove his innocence, I'd rather get that out of the way first.

Edit post

ISO #318 •••
--> @Wryly
VTL Pie

Sorry, I'm too used to Pie's ways. He's a slippery bastard as scum and always pleads for more time. Shining is definitely the lynch here based on the feebleness of his claim, so if Pie has a way to prove his innocence, I'd rather get that out of the way first.


what scum incentive do I have to say what I said lol

Edit post

ISO #319 •••
--> @ILikePie5

Yes, scum Pie claiming to be confirmable while he tries to shift his wagon to another target... unheard of.

Edit post

ISO #320 •••
--> @whiteflame

What the heck do you want me to say? Make shit up?

Edit post

ISO #321 •••
--> @RexFavilla
Yes, scum Pie claiming to be confirmable while he tries to shift his wagon to another target... unheard of.


Bruh I’m saying lynch me TODAY if what I say in inadequate

Edit post

ISO #322 •••
--> @ILikePie5
what scum incentive do I have to say what I said lol


Distract and escalate pressure on another target in hopes of it leading to a quick lynch and escaping to the next DP. Also I don't know what the Ant King has in his arsenal and I'm wary of that; could be you're cooking something that could get you out of this. Your strategy as scum is always to stall, deflect, and use offense as defense.

Edit post

ISO #323 •••
--> @Wryly
Distract and escalate pressure on another target in hopes of it leading to a quick lynch and escaping to the next DP. Also I don't know what the Ant King has in his arsenal and I'm wary of that; could be you're cooking something that could get you out of this. Your strategy as scum is always to stall, deflect, and use offense as defense.


I will commit to not lynching anyone but myself. Does that make u feel better?


unvote

Edit post

ISO #324 •••
--> @RexFavilla

Just answer yes or no if there is another person in your guild that u told this info to

Edit post

ISO #325 •••
--> @ILikePie5
I will commit to not lynching anyone but myself. Does that make u feel better?


In regards to you trying to escape via alternate lynch, yes. In regards to my wariness of the Ant King's abilities, no.


Also, your argument is that you can prove your innocence later, so let's hunt other suspects now. All I'm saying is let's reverse that order. Get your innocence proven so we can eliminate you from POE and move on.

Edit post

ISO #326 •••
--> @Wryly
Also, your argument is that you can prove your innocence later, so let's hunt other suspects now. All I'm saying is let's reverse that order. Get your innocence proven so we can eliminate you from POE and move on.


Im literally asking for one small piece of info. A simple yes or no question




Edit post

ISO #327 •••

I think we just answer Pie's question and see what follows

Edit post

ISO #328 •••

I'm intrigued

Edit post

ISO #329 •••
--> @Shining
What the heck do you want me to say? Make shit up?


I think you are making shit up, so...

Edit post

ISO #330 •••
--> @Mestari

You will be rewarded dw

Edit post