Locked In progress 12 alive

Amber Mafia

Started by Magoroth

Day Phase
Loading...
Replies
1,163
Posts
1,164
Page
13 / 39
Game Info
Main Host: Magoroth
Base Elimination Threshold: 7
Day Phase Ends:

Conversation

Total: 1,164
ISO #361 •••
--> @A-Flora
Llewella - I think these pseudo-vanilla games make it easier to lurk as scum and avoid posting. The posts this person has made just seem snarky for a bit until fading into no existence because other shit pops up

Martin - I think the passive aggressiveness is what I picked up on last game. It was a tiny push, yet an obvious push. Sort of like seeing what sticks. It didn’t stick on me obviously, but with someone like Llewella, odds are greater if sticks.


huh? i didn't vote them or anything, just pointed out they said something hypocritcl. also if u think im going for an obvious push, but you also list llewlla as scum, is ur theory that we are bussing? bcuz scum reading us for independent things but placing as scum, you have to think that if we are scum together we would be making some sort of play here. idk if these reads are real or faked.

Edit post

ISO #362 •••
--> @A-Gerard

Yes


Brand looks bad. D1 mass claim is very scum sided. A-Caine jumping in makes me question if they are teamed.


I agree

Edit post

ISO #363 •••

A-Gerard has 95 posts so far. Why have they said so little?

Edit post

ISO #364 •••
--> @A-Flora
I don’t think that was conservative. It was calculated based on reads of dead townie ie Vader and Helz + the general idea that Banana would be more active than Shining. Plus we had the lynches to spare. I was sus of Banana when everyone was townreading her, and it won us the game

Well I'll take your word for it for now. Honestly me telling you the things I scum read you for this early is probably counter intuitive though because you will know what behavior to change or look out for with how you play if you are scum, so ultimately its probably not really worth discussing. I will say I am backing off of the scum read on you though towards null territory.


I’ve already stated my plan, and you havent said whether you want to do it or not.

Yolo lynching between the VT's? Or did I miss it? If it's the first I'd rather not without significant behavioral reasons for doing so, but if we get to a point where we don't have someone to lynch by EOD I would consider it.


Lol, Brands is also a target. See my reads tho. FOS and under is who I’m fine with pursuing atm

I don't know if I agree with all of your reads, we seem to share a lot of different views, but of the two in your scum pile I would look at Llewella. I vastly disagree with you on random though.


Edit post

ISO #365 •••
--> @A-Llewella


A-Llewella wrote:
A-Gerard has 95 posts so far. Why have they said so little?

I'm surprised I haven't been replaced for inactivity yet

Edit post

ISO #366 •••
--> @A-Llewella
Brand looks bad. D1 mass claim is very scum sided. A-Caine jumping in makes me question if they are teamed.

Can I get your opinion on my read on Brand in post 276. The slip in question is based on "217/218"

Edit post

ISO #367 •••
--> @A-Gerard

If I get an ask in return.


95 posts with little said was not about the post count. It was about how many posts you have made with how little you have really said.

Edit post

ISO #368 •••
--> @A-Llewella


A-Llewella wrote:
If I get an ask in return.

95 posts with little said was not about the post count. It was about how many posts you have made with how little you have really said.\

This is... An interesting take. I was the first one to post an extensive read list, and have been poking and prodding multiple people including yourself for further activity. I have engaged in a lot of dialogue to help further the day phase, and am currently pressuring inactives to post.


I assume you are either not caught up or are trying to rage bait here, because this is honestly just factually incorrect.

Edit post

ISO #369 •••
--> @A-Llewella

Anyways, what is your "ask"?

Edit post

ISO #370 •••
Prince of Chaos (Disguiser)
Description: You are a Chaosite from the royal family, with shapeshifting abilities and the ability to walk the black road the straddles the multiverse.

Ability: Attack a player at night, killing them. You will disguise yourself as them, taking over their account. They will flip with your account’s name, their own role, and your last will. One charge.

Slot: Killing

Check out this role in the set up thread. This is a potential scum role. Holy shit this role is actually OP. And I got hate for including a Yakuza or a Tailor lmao. This role is way more bastard and chaotic. That said, if this role exists it needs to be executed with precision the likes I think only a small few people are capable of pulling off, so in dp2 and onward I will by hyper analyzing people's posting styles for consistency. You should do the same with me.


Edit post

ISO #371 •••

In fact that are a lot of Jester-Esque roles. The "associate" is a 3p role that turns someone into a jester if their liege gets killed. Executioner is basically the same thing but their target is assigned not chosen and they get turned into a Jester. Rogue Tyiga is basically a body swapping Jester.


Thats 3 roles that are basically variations of jesters, then there are other roles like Blackmailer which can be used to set someone up as a mislynch or to slip, Disguiser can be used for jester-esque manipulation and purposeful slips.


There is some wild potential for this game in the deception department, and we need to be ready for that. Begin paranoia inducing yourselves now!

Edit post

ISO #372 •••
--> @A-Llewella

Do we have to policy lynch you for being a non-contributive contrarian dick head or are you going to pull your head out of your ass at some point? I am holding hope for that, so don't let me down bub.

Edit post

ISO #373 •••

Before answering my disguiser crypto/code/whatever is 2071461991611931131


I can explain what that means in 4 parts. If I am killed and replaced nobody else can. I would recommend other people consider creating similar protections in a post.

Edit post

ISO #374 •••
--> @A-Llewella

It has to be solvable by hand, apparently. I have no clue. I use a website to decode Rot-13, but that makes cryptogrophy kind of pointless imo. I am not smart enough to know how to make a hand solved cryptography message, and idek what "solved by hand" means in this context.

Edit post

ISO #375 •••
--> @A-Gerard

I identify as they/them. Please respect my pronoun.

Edit post

ISO #376 •••
--> @A-Gerard

Oh, If its a rule break let me know. Its actually very simple but nothing that can be solved

Edit post

ISO #377 •••

Lets be real though. Think any person on this site could pretend to be me : )

Edit post

ISO #378 •••
--> @A-Llewella
I identify as they/them. Please respect my pronoun.

I will do my best, but if I fuck up, know its because I am an idiot not because I am being hateful or discriminatory. I game with someone who is a they/them and I accidentally say "bro" or "hell yeah man" and stuff all the time and catch myself afterwards and am like "fuck that was an accident lol sorry". They never seem to care. Anyways just a heads up that I am not trying to be toxic if I forget here or there.

Edit post

ISO #379 •••
--> @A-Llewella


A-Llewella wrote:
Lets be real though. Think any person on this site could pretend to be me : )

Well now I know who you are, and my initial impression of who you were is wrong lol. And you are not who you want me to think you are either.

Edit post

ISO #380 •••
--> @A-Llewella


A-Llewella wrote:
Oh, If its a rule break let me know. Its actually very simple but nothing that can be solved

I don't know if it's a rule break and I don't really care, let that be magos job. I was only pointing it out because I do not know how to create one of these for myself unless its Rot-13

Edit post

ISO #381 •••

Automated Vote Count

This vote count was generated by the mafia vote bot.


A-Brand (3/7): A-Random (p#215), A-Llewella (p#222), A-Bleys (p#232)

A-Llewella (2/7): A-Brand (p#6), A-Oberon (p#273)

A-Martin (1/7): A-Flora (p#199)

A-Flora (1/7): A-Caine (p#290)

A-Fiona (1/7): A-Gerard (p#334)


Not Voting (4): A-Deirdre, A-Fiona, A-Julian, A-Martin (p#171)


With 12 players alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Day phase ends in 2 days, 15 hours.

Edit post

ISO #382 •••

In a world where disguisers and blackmailers exist giving some code when its allowed protects you.

Edit post

ISO #383 •••
--> @A-Llewella

I don't dis-agree, I just don't know how to do one by hand lol

Edit post

ISO #384 •••

U2FsdGVkX1+KRL2qtcJ+506tf


gZ7uNBYs3OzZ9EFna2ObNGWwEASjKJxmai3Os/RVPQM7BvTjyhbzuEf9qURcCA7pm6hn/oU9paxy6NjCo8Kb8Ok2U1DWACgOvhfvlJv

Edit post

ISO #385 •••

Encryption Type: aes-256-cbc


I'll keep the pass phrase to myself for now, but drop a hint about what it is at some vague point later in this day phase.

Edit post

ISO #386 •••

Asked Mago if we could use websites that encrypt and decrypt since they are free use and anyone can use them and he approved

Edit post

ISO #387 •••

Would prefer that discussion of who is who or what X did in Y game (specifically when said wrt to a player in this game) be kept to a minimum. It kinda defeats the point of anonymity :(

Edit post

ISO #388 •••

I’ll see what I can do about the inactives.

Edit post

ISO #389 •••
--> @Magoroth
Would prefer that discussion of who is who or what X did in Y game (specifically when said wrt to a player in this game) be kept to a minimum. It kinda defeats the point of anonymity :(

I understand how you feel, but it would be literally impossible to not figure out who people are based on repeated behaviors and posting styles. We can pretend we don't know who each other is, but it is incredibly obvious. Also its impossible for me not to use someone's past tells and behaviors to read them lol. Like for example, if a player I know has a tendency to do something as scum does that thing, and I know they are that player and doing that blatantly scummy thing, am I supposed to just manufacture a reason to lynch them? Part of being town in this game is convincing other people to join your wagon and follow your lead, and if I can't verbalize and substantiate my reasoning for doing so, it becomes difficult to sell a lynch target lol.


I understand where you are coming from. I wanted to do this same idea for a game a while back but ended up nixing the idea for this exact reason. Figured it would basically be pointless with this crew. There might be one or two people who can fool others in this player pool, but the majority of people will just use the same mannerisms, posting styles, and adhere to their same activity schedules, so at that point it becomes kind of obvious.


At the most I can promise really is just trying to stick to calling people by their in game usernames, but I don't really think its possible for me to ignore past analysis regarding games. If that is a deep issue for you I can correct it, but I think it will sway the pace of the game considerably, because I will have to fake why I scum or town read people for the sake of a rule as opposed to having genuine thoughts and reads.

Edit post

ISO #390 •••

I have a feeling someone complained to mago about this. Top candidates for who might have done that would be Llewella, Caine, or Brand I think.

Edit post