Lunatic

Hmm.

omg nooooo I had to catch up on sleep, and didnt get to my argument. G freaking G....

I will try to vote on this in the next few days

Name one thing specifically I rephrased you keep saying that but not supporting it

How can I rephrase something that was never phrased lol

"Con must learn to agree with the description proposed by op, wether flawed or not. "

One was not provided by pro that's the thing. And I feel like definitions are very important in accomplishing what this debate is trying to accomplish.

"Con however argued in bad faith and attempted to both rephrase and redefine the opening statement of pro, which, again, is against the description."

In what way? Please make that make sense.

"I recommend both pro and con make sure to define things very clearly"

Wait didn't you just say I set a definition and that I was wrong for doing so? Make up your mind, am I allowed to define things or not? lmaooo

Don't know what the hell your talking about Mal.

If this ever happens again I think Randy vs Cartman makes an excellent match up

Thanks mikal

Thanks for the vote whiteflame!

Faux, you can vote however, but lack of demonstration about "the audience" isn't true, refer to my first imbd source which ranks all of the Butters episodes I am referring to. I am not just pulling out these rankings from my butt. If you do not think arguments based on audience popularity are strong that is fair, but to outright deny that I had a source is odd assuming you read my sources.

Thanks you as well!

Can be any character

Funny is arbitrary, obviously what you think is funniest is relative to you, and how well you can argue that your character is better than another. etc. I am not really looking to get into semantics around the word funny, if the debate devolves to that, it would be ruined imo. This is more of a fun debate

Holy crap is that really philochristos? Long time no see! Good to see you around dude, its been years!

Thanks for the votes homies.

Thanks whiteflame

thanks for the vote and extended thoughts leaning!

Thanks for voting fauxlaw :)

I am also a supporter of Laissez-Faire, I took a devils advocate position for this debate however because I thought it would be a fun way to challenge my own beliefs.

Thankyou for reading the debate and for the compliments good sir

Thanks to mikal!