Go to a church, you can find a lot of women with that profile you are looking for.
Personally, I prefer to find a wife in the rural area. They are very likely not polluted with the urban shit like feminism and this kind of stuff.
Go to a church, you can find a lot of women with that profile you are looking for.
Personally, I prefer to find a wife in the rural area. They are very likely not polluted with the urban shit like feminism and this kind of stuff.
Sidewalker wrote:
I've actually engaged a third option, had a long and close relationship with a Medicine woman, she was a heap big spirit woman and let me tell you, it takes on a whole new dimension when you are pretty sure that your therapist could turn you into a newt if she wanted to.
Oh, I didn't know you were in this New Age movement. I guess you are more of the belief in ancient knowledge like the Kyballion.
Aren't you?
Sidewalker wrote:
Misterio wrote:
A confession before a priest is like going to see a shrink. That's all.
Are you telling us you've done both?
Yes, I once visited a psychotherapist. It's not a big deal, you tell what bothers you and he replies saying it's all good, nothing more. The only difference is that the priest forces you to pray for redemption while the shrink prescribes you medication in certain cases, it wasn't my case though.
That phrase "profit is a theft" only can come from a fkn leftist.
Every business has a budget, so the profit is the difference between the income and the cost, before taxes. If owners want a big profit, they have two possibilities, increase the product/service's price or reduce costs. The former is ruled out at once because the competition is very hard out there, so owners prefer to reduce costs, either in the supply or the labour. They usually choose to reduce labour costs because changing the supplies for a product or service can be critical for the QoS of any business.
So, if people see that the salaries are going down is just because there is a fierce competition going on in the market among businesses. If a business see that another business reduces the prices of their products because they are replacing their labour with a lot of illegal inmigrants that Joe Biden let in, then they have to follow suite, they are not idiots.
Fkn leftists usually think profit is a theft because they don't understand how the market works, let alone the economy. People start a business because they usually expect to have a better return on investment than what they would get in a bank. If it weren't like this, people would never put a fkn penny to any business and the country would collapse due to a lack of entrepreneurship. That's what the profit is for, to encourage people to start a business because there is a high reward if they succeed. That's why in a communist country people don't start businesses, because there is no reward at all, so people either flee to another country or stay to lie on a couch scratching their balls all day long.
But don't think only entrepreneurs can have a reward for what they're doing, that also works for employees. Start a business is fkn risky and difficult, you can end up working like a slave at the beginning to make your business take off, that's what the profit is for as I said. So, as owners know that profit can make you move your ass to do difficult things, they usually reward the valuable employees so they can give it all for the business. This reward can come as sale commissions, bonus, etc, but all depends on how valuable the employee is for the business, which means how much money the employee can produce for the business. If the employee is not valuable at all, his salary will depend on the supply and the demand for labour as any product/service in the market.
A confession before a priest is like going to see a shrink. That's all.
You're rich, man. I don't know why you complain so much.
SatanLucy wrote:
What do you mean by "us"? You're South Korean
No, I am Bosnian. Now read again.
Your clothes are Bosnian. You're South Korean.
SatanLucy wrote:
Bosnia only lost cuz they were literally beating us up.
They kicked our goalkeeper in the eye, they did like 3 or 4 things which were supposed to get red card but no.
What do you mean by "us"? You're South Korean, not a yankee.
You must be one of the few Americans that are aware of what is going in the World Cup. Lol.
Trump seems not to be conscious that football is a passion for the rest of the world. Everybody is right now outraged for what Trump and the FIFA did. This is not good for him and for his image around the world.
He stepped on a defender's ankle. It wasn't on purpose but it's considered as a dangerous move anyway because it can injure the player seriously.
It's really weird that Democrats in this forum didn't bring this subject up considering it's an unacceptable behavior from a president of one of the host countries of the FIFA World Cup.
I know Americans don't give a shit about football, so-called soccer by them, so I'll give a short explanation of what happened.
Balogun, an American footballer, was red-carded in the match against Bosnia-Herzegovina, so that means he wasn't going to be in the next match against Belgium. If you don't know, Balogun is among the best footballers in the US, so it could have been an important loss.
Here it is where Trump got in action. He made a call to Infantino, the FIFA president, to reconsider the sanction. Next day, Balogun was all of a sudden able to play in the match. Of course, the Belgian team called out the FIFA for the decision, but the best way they found to speak out was humilliating the US team in the field. Belgium defeated the US by a large margin, four goals no less.
I can't defend what Trump did, and everybody knows the FIFA is a corruption nest. He's got to think it twice when trying to mix politics with sports, specially when it comes to the FIFA.
Trump doesn't want to abolish the birthright citizenship, he just wants to make it clear that this law should only reach the American parents, not the tourists or illegal inmigrants.
Tourist babies are not the real problem because they tend to be middle class people. Illegal babies are. If tourists were taking advantage of the law, imagine the illegal inmigrants.
I understant that Democrats need to win the debate, but this is not a reason to defend illegal actions like illegal inmigration and all the related consequences.
Laws are not written on stone. Americans can ammend it.
It's not a human right violation if Americans don't give citizenship to tourist's babies born in the US. Most of the countries have an embassy in the US, so it's very easy for the tourists to register their babies in their respective embassy.
This law makes no sense.
Everybody knows that before 2020 there was a huge business around tourists that wanted to give birth in the US, specially women that come from the third world. For these women, it was a privilege that their children became American citizens so easily. I know of several cases where pregnant women went to the US expressly to give birth. I mean, if a Mexican woman has a visa, what citizenship does she prefer for her baby? The American, of course, because Mexico is a shithole country.
Trump knows very well about it, that's why he's fighting to change the law because he feels the world is taking Americans for fools. I'd feel the same way if I were an American, that's an abuse the tourists are commiting against the US.
You've just proved that if there is God, he's not loving because this is your assumption in your first statement.
These are general purpose AIs. The specialized AIs are embedded in specialized programs.
Many programs are coming with their AI prompt, like photoshop, word, outlook, visual studio code, etc.
SatanLucy wrote:
Person who works two jobs isnt a person. Just a worker bee. the best way to destroy a nation is to make people work a lot. No time for thinking. What great future awaits a nation who doesnt think!
Unfortunately.
As I said, the problem is the finance industry. In the video, there is a bitch who explains very well what it's going on in the US.
She says that most people who have money saved in the bank, invest it on the finance industry, buying financial assets, which ends up in pure speculation, instead of investing in something productive like setting up a business that will hire people to produce high-value products or services.
Society is supposed to produce goods in order to maintain a healthy economy and keep the people productive. However, the media sold us that financial investment is the most profitable way to make easy money, that's why there is barely manufacturing industries in the US.
It doesn't matter how much Trump tries to bring back the factories, it will never come back because people have a lot of Wall Street wolves selling them smoke and mirrors.
From my understanding, Adam Smith just tried to explain how the market works and not to set an ideology that everyone should embrace. To write it out cleanly, Smith was doing economic science.
In this sense, he was right, you have to let the market do the job, which means the government should avoid intervening the market. This is the correct way to create wealth. If you let the government set the prices or control in any way the market, the whole economy will get fucked up as it happens in a communist or socialist regime.
The problem here is that you think that if a country implements social assistance for their people they're automatically socialists in all the sense of the word. That's not true. In a socialist country there is no private property, nor entrepreneurship, there is only a regime that controls the whole economy. So, the wealthy countries you refer to are capitalists and among the most liberals. In fact, there is a high correlation between liberalism and wealth.
I understand that Americans are going through terrible moments. I heard an average American needs two jobs to make ends meet, that's fkn awful. I don't know how the American economy works but from what I've seen, the major financial crisis were due to financial products. Yes, I've been telling all along that the banking is the major obstacle for the human progress and that includes the central banks. Those mothefuckers are the most evil human beings in the Earth and they are the main problem in the economy because they're distorting the market with their fkn speculation. Not to mention that the bankers were the instigators of the world wars.
All in all, capitalism is not the problem. The system built over capitalism and their creators are.
I must be the most stupid person here in this forum for trying to debate with a political militant like you.
I don't think we can reach common groung in absolutely anything because you're clearly a member of the Democratic Party. It doesn't matter what I state, let alone the evidence I show, you will always take a stand in favour of Democrats no matter how disastrous, lefty and ridiculous they are in matter of governance.
Just remember, the European Parliament is getting stricter in terms of migration policies and approved a new migration return law for illegal migrants. Decades of being woke hasn't payed off, so Europeans are forcing their politicians to be more conservative. It should be a lesson for the US.
Double_R wrote:
What part exactly was bullshit? Please, do explain.
You said the hotels were a sort of temporal solution because of the pandemics, but the truth is that it was permanent, until last year when the last hotel was closed.
I am, you clearly are not.
I never argued it was “profitable” or even beneficial to pay for the housing of illegals. What I did there was throw your own logic back at you, and your response demonstrates that you do in fact realize it does not work.
When government spending goes towards things you agree with, you argued it helps everyone out because it puts money in Americans pockets. But when it goes towards things you don’t agree with, even though it’s going into Americans pockets just the same, you argue it’s the cause of people’s economic problems. Your position is not rationally coherent.
You can argue it’s bad policy. You cannot argue that this relatively minuscule portion of government spending is causing your problems. That’s the point.
What is this Trump's spending I was supossedly defending?
I said Trump did wrong when getting into an unnecessary war with Iran, and that includes the spending.
The spending in inmigrants, on the other hand, is not something we should dismiss either.
1% of anything is still 1%.
Come on, dejate de joder.
First off, you totally ignored everything I said about why we even have USAID in the first place. That’s not surprising because you haven’t made a substantive argument this entire conversation, but I’ll point it out anyway.
Second, this is literally what the phrase “throw the baby out with the bath water” is talking about. If some of its programs are good and some are bad, keep the good ones and get rid of the bad ones. That’s second grade level logic.
Third, I’d really love to hear which programs exactly you’re referring to. I’ve heard and followed up on these claims a dozen times already. Every time some DOGE apologist cites “woke” programs that needed to go they always turn out to be lazily mischaracterized programs that had a real point and purpose but were caricatured to sound stupid. Given the lack of depth you continue to show here, I suspect you just read a few right wing headlines and are now here now spewing the propagandistic garbage you were fed.
I said there were good programs that Trump should have kept from this agency. I guess he got rid of the whole USAID because of the American economic situation, which is a valid spending cut because the yankees are not bound to help other countries.
As to the useless programs of USAID, I referred specifically to the ones associated with the wokism like the infamous DEI program.
This is what 911 truthers say.
When you make a claim the burden is on you to prove it. That’s how rational conversation works. “I’m exempted from explaining my positions” is certainly not.
I think I made myself very clear and my comments should leave no room for misinterpretations. I really dislike to state the obvious.
Double_R wrote:
There was one example of illegals being placed in a “5 star” hotel, and that hotel was closed due to the pandemic and repurposed for migrant housing. They were using the space, not receiving 5 star accommodations. This is not a serious response.
Bullshit, This benefit went on after the pandemic.
Back to the actual point; you have yet to address the fact that the money being spent on these illegals did not go into their pockets, it went into the pockets of other Americans to do the work and/or provide the space. So again, if you are claiming anyone is right to call out this issue as the cause of their economic pain then you have yet to provide a single rationale to justify that.
So, why didn't Biden let more inmigrants in if it was so profitable for the Americans? Are you really reading what you're writing?
Social assistance is a cost for any government in any part of the world. There is no such profitability because the inmigrants need not just shelter but health assistance and education for their children. Where does this money come from? Yeah, from the taxes you and your folks pay.
Besides, inmigrants create more pressure to these public services. You can see in the news how Americans complained about these public services because they had to wait too long to be treated as the number of inmigrants needing assistance high rocketed. But you don't give a shit because I guess you use the private service.
And I'm not talking about the security issues created by the inmigrants, specially Venezuelans. That was the cherry on top.
And you think this is what destroyed us?
USAID was something like 1% of the federal budget, and was supported uncontroversially for decades by both parties until Trump started telling all the uneducated people how terrible it was. It wasn’t just about charity, it was about increasing our soft power globally, and the work they did often saved lives and money back home. When diseases break out in another country, you think they just stay there? Of course not.
But you can’t speak to that, so you just repeat your propagandistic talking points and rail at like the 1.5% of the USAID budget you cherry picked that sounds really bad if you don’t bother to ask what these programs actually did.
Yeah, sure, 1% of $7 trillion dollars, it's almost nothing. Hahaha.
You can't imagine how much Trump wants to make the economy grow at least one fucking percent and you're here underestimating the money spent in USAID.
Trump did good when removing this shitty program. I've got to admit that USAID had some good socials programs that were very useful for the third world, but Biden increased the budged unnecessarily for their woke agenda and that caused that Trump got rid of it. It is a pity.
Yeah, it’ll a waste of time because you clearly have not bothered to critically examine any of your claims and are just looking for me to agree with them. That’s not how reasonable conversation works.
Perhaps your points would land if you’d explain them rather than assuming everyone else will just “get it”. That only works within your echo chamber.
Do you want me to do a doctoral thesis about that? The subject matter is so clear and so evident that it exempts me from giving further explanation.
Biden tried to transform the government into a rainbow but Trump didn't let him do that.
Double_R wrote:
That’s kind of my point. When money is spent housing illegals, then it is legitimate to blame your problems on that decision. But when it comes spending money on just about anything else, it’s not. That’s not rationally defensible.
You can argue that we should not be spending that money on illegals, that’s fine, but every dollar the government spends within the country helps the economy just the same. That money paying off illegals housing goes towards hotels, which allows them to continue paying their employees, vendors, etc. Plus the view that it “could have gone to Americans” only makes sense if you actually believe the government should be subsidizing other Americans, which the political right is against in the first place, so it fails every consistency check.
Are you serious? Paying 5 star hotel rooms for illegals? That sounds like a joke.
To me it's very clear, the left is equal to economic waste.
This is incoherent.
We were talking about the economy, then you slipped in the “cultural narrative” which the left allegedly destroyed, without explaining what or how, or how it relates to the economy.
What did the left destroy exactly? What fuckups did Biden leave? Why are we thanking Trump? Happy to be enlightened.
Biden was introducing the wokism in the American society surreptitiously and it had to do a lot with the economy because that kind of policies cost money.
Maybe the most costly American agency that has been promoting wokism was USAID which was closed by Trump. This agency promoted the lefty agenda like the green agenda, the LGBT agenda, and that kind of shit lefties promote internationally.
In the US, there were some policies that introduced wokism in all the American institutions. The most controversial policy was that one of equality in the army. Trump was well aware about that when he was almost assasinated in the campaign. You might remember that a female bodyguard that was supposed to protect Trump didn't do a good job because of that woke policy promoted by Biden.
I can tell a lot about it but it would be a waste of time. Biden let wokism take over the US government, Trump is just correcting it.
fauxlaw wrote:
When are we going to figure out that absolutely none of us, not one in 8 billion, is either black or white, or any other "color" we've devised for skin? So, why do we try to make that distinction? It says nothing of what or who we are, and not one of us determined it in the first place, so... so what?
you've just described the American history. Lol.
It's good to see you trying to change that. The American society needs it urgently, more than any other country.
Double_R wrote:
Help me understand that logic here. So if illegal immigrants receive government assistance, then that’s partly to blame for people’s problems because that’s money that could have gone to Americans. But when the US gives tax breaks to billionaires, spends billions on totally unnecessary wars, or even when the government cuts programs (as in actual money going to actual Americans)… that’s not?
If you refer to the Iran war, I can agree with it. In fact, I criticized Trump for being so impulsive. It's the only error I can see in Trump's government along with the inflation.
As to the other imputations, I don't understand how tax breaks couldn't benefit the whole economy, not just billionaries. A tax break is a liberal measure that works perfectly as well as the social program cuts which honestly were only benefiting the huge NGOs plagued by leftists and communists. Biden was literally sustaining a lefty apparatus of theft.
The difference is that inflation during the Biden years was almost entirely caused by a global pandemic. And one easy way to confirm that is to look across the globe and see that nearly all of our peer nations were experiencing the same thing, so there is no real reason to consider it.
Inflation during this term is almost entirely created by Trump and his policies, and it was all foreseeable, the man is just an idiot.
It was created by the Iran war, I'm not denying it.
It doesn't matter anyway, a huge financial crisis is coming, but I guess Democrats will blame Trump for that.
Stupid only by the highest standards one could possibly hold. And it’s fine to hold that standard for such a high and consequential position like President of the United States, but the point is that anyone who isn’t bewildered that such an incredibly imbecilic moron like Trump could ever get elected doesn’t get to pretend they care about such standards.
He got elected because the US was already reaching a point of no return where the international left was taking over the cultural narrative. In short, the US was well on the way to becoming like Europe, a decadent continent.
You've got to thank Trump for having the balls to correct that. It's not the best prospect, I accept it, but it's good enough to solve the fuck-ups Biden left.
Shoresy wrote:
Bill Clinton and Trump are almost completely identical policy-wise.
Trump was raised, and still is...a 90's Democrat.
Exactly.
I don't know what happened to Democrats. People say the decline of Democrat Party started when Obama became president.
Voting either for Democrats or Republicans was almost the same back then.
linate wrote:
Clinton was a reference to Hilary Clinton. All three that I asked about were who trump ran against in all three of his presidential bids.
Is illegal immigration such a huge deal that it justifies the trump train wreck?
Yes.
I don't know where you live but Americans were pissed off by the illegal inmigration because they felt it was the cause of their problems. In part it was. It seems that you forgot that many Venezuelans received as refugees commited horrible crimes in several sanctuary States. Despite that, the government continued giving them assistance with the taxes you and all Americans pay.
Isn't it outrageous for you?
Simply asserting that trump does what Biden doesn't isn't an argument.
What do you mean it's not an argument? If people feel that something is missing they're going to vote for the one who has the balls to do it.
Besides, you're not considering the economy in Biden's term, it was terrible. And if Trump is not solving the inflation in the US now, he will face the same problems.
Simply asserting that Harris is taken seriously isn't a real argument. It's just vibes. Trump is a disaster and Harris is at least competent and knowledge enough to be considered in her own right against such a low standard like trump. I often have to remind everyone myself included that no one has standards when it comes to trump but so many people suddenly want to have standards when it comes to his competition
Harris is a stupid woman.
I'm not a native English speaker but it's easy to realize that she's not as lucid as people think. You just have to listen to her.
Trump is just doing what Biden didn't and it's no small thing. People cares a lot about illegal inmigration and economy, that's why people voted not for Trump but against Biden.
On the other hand, Clinton did a good job despite the fact that he was a horn dog. So, I don't understand why you include him in the debate. Obama should be there though.
As to Harris, what can I say? She is not taken seriously, not even in the Democrat party.
I'm not going to defend Trump but what all you described is exaggerated.
Trump is completing his term in 2029 and Americans will very likely elect Marco Rubio as his next president. I don't know how but I have this feeling.
What I see is that some Asian teams are playing fkn good, specially Japan and South Korea.
Japan beat Germany 4 to 1 yesterday, that's crazy.
South Korea, where you were born and raised, is also playing good, I have high hopes for them too.
Anyhow, it's very likely that a European or a Latinamerican team wins the world cup. According to some predictions, the final will be between Argentina and Spain, or Portugal.
It's really a pity that Brazil has lost their competitiveness. I hope they come back to their glorious times.
Well, it's a surprise to see the US football team is playing really good. I'm not going to say Paraguay is one of the strongest Latinamerican teams but they're not bad at playing football.
I'm looking forward to seeing more from the yankies because I see there are a lot of blacks and hispanics in the team, specially the blacks who are genetically predisposed to play football better than the others, like France that looks like an African team.