Misterio

No, what you should do is take my opinions for what they are worth,

You have no opinion, you just act like a parrot repeating what the democrat politicians say about it.

Today, the general in charge of the operations said in the Congress that there wasn't an order to kill all the survivors, so your accusation is unfounded.

What drew my attention is that the Democrat senators refered to the survivors of the attacks as "sailors", while the Republican senators refered to them as narco terrorists. So, who should I take seriously?

I explained why no reasonable person should accept the administration’s story here without strong evidentiary support, which the administration hasn’t even pretended to feel obligated to do.

I never defended these individuals. I explained why even in a worst case scenario, killing the people on board is a war crime at worst, and at best deeply unethical.

Bullshit. This is just part of the dirty game Democrats are playing against Republicans.

Senator Luna, my Goddess, said that Democrats never said anything similar when Barack Obama did the same in the Middle East. This is the typical double standard of Democrats.

And now we pivot to “defeating socialism” which has nothing to do with this conversation.

It has a lot to do. Didn't you know Venezuela is a socialist dictatorship?

You also must know that the trustworthy person of Hugo Chavez has testified that the drug smuggling from Venezuela to the US was part of a socialist plan, suggested by Cuba, to undermine the American society. Remember when Fidel Castro sent criminals to the US as refugees? Have you ever seen "Scarface"?

Socialism is the real threat and you still believe it's something good. Lol.

Well, I've got to take your opinion as the Trump hater that you are. What amazes me, though, is that in order to bash Trump you are very capable of defending these "poor people" who smuggle drugs on boats as if they didn't know what they are doing. Lol.

Anyway. From what I've found out, Americans think Venezuela is not a big threat, so it seems to be a sort of misinformation. Americans should know that the US has a lot to gain defeating Venezuela's socialist narco government. Read carefully:

1. Venezuela is just the beginning of what Trump wants to do, which is to destroy the main drug cartels in Latin America. It's going to be hard at the beginnig for the cocaine American consumers (who are not few) but they're going to thank Trump in the future. Moreover, it's well known that drug cartels are the main factor of the violence experienced in most regions of Latin America, which at the same time has produced the migration of great masses of people that don't want to live under this violence. Isn't it what Americans want?

1. Defeating socialism in Latin America is defeating Russia. You must know that Cuban communism was very handy for the URSS in the Cold War, and it's still useful for the Russian interests. Few people know that Russia is interfering all the time in South America, through what they know to do best, the socialism propaganda. It's really ironic that while Russia left the idea of socialism because it's crap, they promote socialism in LatinAmerica. Why is that? Because these muthafuckers want to spoil the American backyard and at some point spread this mess to the US, the last has been done partially if you didn't notice.

1. What Trump is going to do is benefitial for all Latin America because socialism was a destructive force for all the region. If Trump achieves his plan to end up with socialism, all Latin America will thrive economically and socially, which means no more migration, no more violence exporting, no more crappy ideologies contagions. The US will have a group of prosperous partners as neighbors that can add up as a force against the main enemies of the US who are the muslim and socialist countries.

So, bald man, this is not a little thing. It's a win-win plan that I suscribe. I'm really looking forward to seeing all America, from the Patagonia to Alaska, free from socialism.

Help me understand this. Trump declared war on drugs and he'll start it off with Venezuela where El Cartel de los Soles control the cocaine production and smuggling. It sounds good for the US because according to Trump, more than 200K Americans died from drugs, but on the other hand, Americans oppose a military intervention in Venezuela.

How is that possible if this intervention is supposed to be good for Americans? I know Americans like cocaine a lot, along with the Maria Juana, I mean judging by the high drug consumption, but I don't think this is the reason Americans oppose it, that would be sick.

How do you explain this apparent contradiction?

I care, I also stutter, have uneven teeth, poor eye sight, was abused a lot, and I often poop blood. Now, pooping blood isnt bad because I can pray to blood Gods when it happens.

The only thing I'd be worried about is the bloody poop, but even so, you visit a hooker to fuck, not to crap.

Older American male customers of sex workers pay for more sex as they age. These findings are reported in a study which surveyed older American men who frequent sex work websites and discussion boards. It was conducted by Los Angeles-based psychotherapist Christine Milrod and sociologist Martin Monto of the University of Portland in the US and published in Springer's journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The participants were 208 men between the ages of 60 and 84 years old from 36 American states who posted or read reviews or comments on female sex work review websites and discussion boards. They were asked 129 questions about their sexual health, behaviors and preferences. More than two-thirds (68.5 percent) were married, and most wanted to keep their activities secret. Over 85 percent of participants held at least a Bachelor's or graduate degree and enjoyed an annual income above that of the average American household. 

So, I wasn't that bad after all. 😁

I have little dick and herpes.

Who the fk cares about it? Hookers don't care as long as you pay them well.

Yeah, I think I am still young. But once I am 40, its going to be horrible. Imagine being over 40 years old, thats like, way too old. I wouldnt want to live past age 40. I still have years of my youth left before I turn 40 and hopefully die from heart attack or cancer.

Being forty is not the end of the world. I can still lift heavy weighs and run, not like old times but I can do it incredibly well.

And most importantly, I can still have sex. The only thing that has changed is that there is a minimal delay to get bricked, not a big deal because I have all the time of the world to enjoy it.

You play video games all day long and give money to the poor. You're fkn wealthy, BK.

I don't understand why you complain all the time if you're rich. 😁

To my understanding, language is part of the culture, so...

You have limited evidence of people saying they've seen actual aliens. This is too sparse to make solid claims of.

The documentary I presented in this thread reveals a lot of testimonies from important people that worked in the retrieval of crashed alienships in the American government. There are even scientists involved in the UFO project. You have plenty of stories about it and all of them talk about non-human beings. It's no a small thing, let alone sparse.

In fact, it's very likely that Trump disclose the UFO files very soon. But even so, the skepticals will say it's fake. Lol.

You yourself present video evidence of spacecraft but you are too bias to acknowledge that the videos you provide are inconclusive.

What videos specifically? I think it doesn't matter if I present a high resolution video of a UFO, the same skepticals will come to say it's fake, so I prefer not to waste my time. I bet these skeptical don't want to see the documentary. Lol.

I'd argue when it gets down to science theres more evidence for the afterlife than ufos

Whatever, man, However, I'm of the opinion that the UFO disclosure is more important for our species because it will change everything, including the religion and the whole science.

you remind me of me, when i'm talking about near death experiences. to me, evidence from NDEs obviously points to an afterlife or at least a mind that's separate from the body. to you the evidence is obvious about UFOs. to others, they see UFOs and NDEs as evidence of something, but they aren't sure what. at least, to at least admit that NDEs or UFOs are evidence of something but with uncertainty of what, is a plausible position. to state that they are evidence of nothing and there's nothing to see here... that's completely irrational.

I'm not sure if it's the same, I think NDEs are harder to prove due to the nature of the evidence, it's like trying to convince people of the existence of ghosts, like the movie Ghost which, by the way, is based on real testimonies about the hereafter.

I think it's easier to prove that these UFOs are crewed by extraterrestrial beings. I mean, what else could it be? The problem is that there are so many people that don't have general knowledge about basic stuff in history, science or religion. With this knowledge it's easier to put the puzzle together.

to me, i tend to think UFOs are evidence of extraterrestrials but i'm not sure about that. like those other people, i view them as evidence of something but i'm not sure what. the christian part of me knows the bible talks about 'sight, signs, and wonders' that could be evil spirits and wonder if that's what UFOs are. that's just my christian bias though. i've been open to seeing more things as demonic or false or lacking truth 'sights, signs, and wonders', so naturally i kinda wonder if that fits UFOs.

I don't know why you're so obsessed about NDEs but I can tell you that the afterlife is very related to these ETs because these fkn aliens understand pretty well how that works. I guess they know because they don't reincarnate.

Moreover, I wouldn't trust too much on the bible. Remember that the bible is a translated book which is susceptible to errors, changes and discards. Instead, you have a lot of alternatives to expand your knowledge about it. Read other authors like Edgar Cayce for example. Keep reading more content and take what resonates with you. Just follow your intuition which, for some people, is the voice of your soul.

If an ET civilisation has developed the technology and has the ability to get here, then it will get here, and won't be afraid to do so.

I explained many times to you the logical argument:

1) The ETs that got here in the Earth are technologically more evolved than us, otherwise they couldn't be here doing interplanetary travels.

2) As the ETs are more evolved than us, they see us as primitives. They don't approach because we are like wild animals for them. We are their zoo.

3) There are certain people among us that achieved a respectable level of mental progress so ETs contact these people in order to spread the news about them. Can you imagine if the ETs contact the fkn violent military? Or even worse, the fkn liar politicians? There is no way.

You're free to refuse the idea of extraterrestrial life despite the many testimonies and logical arguments you have out there, but something tells me that if Trump declassifies the UFO files tomorrow, you'll keep refusing it anyway. Lol.

Assuming that there should be is a reasonable assumption.

And suggesting that there might not be, is a reasonable suggestion.

Well, you seem to not have read enough about science. The likelihood of extraterrestrial life is very high, so your second statement is completely wrong.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/apr/17/scientists-hail-strongest-evidence-so-far-for-life-beyond-our-solar-system

https://www.vice.com/en/article/a-scientist-just-mathematically-proved-that-alien-life-in-the-universe-is-likely-to-exist/

So if ET's are clever enough and have the technological ability to get here, then why keep fu*king about with all the sketchy unidentifiable introductions.

What about the uncountable UFO videos? and the testimonies of former officials that couldn't testify at the time?

ETs don't show up because of the same reason we don't approach the wild life. It would be stupid and highly risky. That's why ETs only show up to certain people that have their consciosness expanded and understand what it's going on. As for the rest of people. ETs keep away from them, otherwise it would be like trying to greet a gorilla or a lion, they would just expect violence as reaction. Humanity is like a zoo for them.

Mind you, if ETs showed up right now, all these idiotic religious people would attack them since they're convinced the ETs are fallen angels (or demons). Hahahaha. Well, at least these zealots acknowledge the existence of extraterrestrial life.

Where did you get that idea? I'm not an atheist by any stretch of the imagination.

Oh, well. Glad to see you're not atheist.

Checking on your posts, you seem to have an ambiguous position. Your comments in the religion forum are unintelligile.

How do you identify yourself?

I saw a UFO when I was around 13-14 years old, sort of uneventful story, three friends and I saw it in the distance moving slowly, nobody believed us but the next day the Cincinnati Enquirer reported that hundreds of other people had reported seeing it.

I believe they are evidence of extraterrestrial intelligent life.

Thank you for your testimony. I thought you were going to make fun of this thread as the atheist that you are.

I think it's natural to conclude UFOs are alien ships because they resemble our aircrafts as they are made of metal and use lights during the night. So, it's logical to think they are crewed by intelligent beings.

Once you accept flat earth theory, a lot of other things add up.

UFO/UAP is not a theory, it's something real that certain people are reluclant to accept because it clashes with their beliefs.

I came to the conclusion that these people are radicals, either religious or atheists. They don't want their beliefs to be challenged.

In all honesty, I don't understand those who say we are alone in this universe eventhough there are several videos showing flying objects that don't look like human technology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXUEcfgZv70

I understand that there are UFO videos that are fake because jerks exist everywhere, but we have to give credit to some videos that are 100% real, specially the official video records from governments.

Even so, let's pretend that all the videos are fake, we can still count on the thousands of testimonies about it which the most valuable comes from the former officials that worked in the reverse engineer of the retrieved alien ships.

I mean, it's like in a trial, a judge can't have solid evidence to decide if someone is guilty or not, but he can count on the testimonies. I'm not a fkn shyster but I know a judge can value the testimonies as legit evidence. The more the testimonies, the better.

Anyway, what I value the most about this issue is that people are not afraid anymore to talk about it. In the past, people were afraid of being ridiculed or being cast out of the society if they talked openly about it. Now nobody blushes at it. I'm fairly satisfied because that tells we're very close to the disclosure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJPrxBQvAK8

That is why internet porn is a life saver to many.

I was referring to real chicks. Hookers to be more specific.

I hope I can make real food some day. The most complex meal I prepared was a salad. Lol.

Here’s a health tip that might sound pretty good to many guys: Have more sex, or masturbate more, and you might lower your odds of getting prostrate cancer. Research suggests that the more often men ejaculate, the less likely they are to have the disease. 

That's because your prostate, the small gland that's located below your bladder and in front of your rectum, adds fluids to your semen. The muscles of your prostate also help force your semen into your urethra and out of your body when you have an orgasm.

I don't know why I started to think about the Kegel exercises after reading your comment.

Can you have good sex after 70?

Absolutely. There’s no reason you can’t keep having good sex after 70 and beyond. Men and women in their 70s can and do have sex. Many people in their 80s and even 90s stay sexually active. 

Some benefits of having sex later in life include:

Increased happiness

Improved mental and physical health

A longer life span

Stronger relationship

A break from the worries of the world

I was considering euthanasia as I lost the ability to get bricked but your post gets my hopes up.

I was expecting to die at 65 or 70, but I think I will endure more. 😁

At around 30, I had a wife, two children and a mortgage to support.

That's why people of your generation looked older than the new generations.

Children suck all your vital energy out.

Though how many other species actually fuck for non-procreational pleasure I couldn't say...Best ask a zoologist.

A lot.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20140613-do-animals-have-sex-for-fun

Do you enjoy watching horses fuck?

Yes, there were certain times in which I enjoyed watching a horse neighing out of pleasure, like in an episode of Jackass where they had to inseminate a mare and for that they had to jerk off a male horse, that was fkn hillarous.

Sex, can also spread disease STDs.

This is a good reason to have a contract with a sexual partner, like the marriage, but marriage shouldn't be necessarily between two persons, it could be between three, four, or a complete harem as the mormons or the muslims.

So, as long as the parties agree with the contract, they can preserve their sexual health. If you break the contract, you're risking the health of your legal partner, as well as the mental health.

I don’t think animals have sex for any reasom.

Animals are not robots, they have the same feelings we have when we sleep with people of the opposite sex, or the same sex if we talk about homosexuals. I mean, at least the mammals which is the category we belong to.

So, animals have sex because they like it. First, the male likes how the female smells (the famous pheromones), then they like when they get aroused, and finally they like when they put it inside and reach orgasm. Animals don't think about the critter they are conciving, they just want to get it on.

Yes, sex is from Satan. No sex in heaven. I must warn you, there will be plenty of sex in hell. Satan promised me 50.000 sex demons!

No wonder I called myself IL DIAVOLO. 😁

Sex is basically a procreational process, intelligently evolved into a recreational exercise.

Do you really think animals fuck one another in order to procreate? No, they don't. They have sex because it's filthily delicious. Just see how a horse neighs when it reaches orgasm.

I asked if sex is a sin in a moral sense rather than in a biblical interpretation. Sex per se is not bad at all, what it's bad though is that in order to get it you have to make someone else suffer from it. I guess marriage was created for that, in order to protect the family created because we all know there are people that are so fucking weak that can abandon their families only for having as much sex as they can with someone else.

I'm convinced that if there are people that are ok to have multiple sexual partners, sex in this context would be utterly ok. For example, swingers are cool doing what they do, and much to my delight, that's completely fine. 😂

Sex is perhaps the most difficult carnal desire to control. I believe religions set up draconian rules about sex in a vain attempt to tame human beings. I like sex a lot but I can control it. I've never, ever, made a woman suffer because of that, and not precisely thanks to a fkn religion. So, I think religions failed misserably to stop human beings from losing their minds for sex.

Why?

Though I don't think Misterio has done a good job yet of setting it aside as so different from various other religions and philosophical systems.

Well, in all honesty I didn't prepare an argumentation to make my point. That's why you feel like all the ideas are untided.

Though I've been checking a bit of it and to me the best argument for Buddhism over the other religions is the amount of detractors against it. Buddhism has barely criticism. In contrast, Christianity and Islam have had a lot of opposition and criticism mainly because of the amount of violence that they created.