Define, "Nazi".
Define, "Nazi".
Not what I said.
->Is this the part where you tell me what I believe?
Yes because I know I'm correct. You're predictable.
->I'm pretty sure Savant would rather be alone with a bear than take advice about his sex life from Remy Brown.
It's funny how you think that I actually believe that women owe me sex. They don't. But they owe this nation logic and ethics if they can vote.
->I'd rather talk to a bear, they're smarter, more interesting, and more logical.
And yet you are talking to me a lot (and you don't go out hiking in the Oregon forests to find a bear to talk too who you believe is more logical). You Skywalker don't care if what you're saying makes sense as long as it feels good.
->Your emotional arguments have convinced zero people to my knowledge.
I've convinced Debby on a lot of things (or my trial did). She saw all of my posts and was trying to find what was offensive.
-> I've seen people change their mind here but it's only ever because the other person makes a logical argument.
Examples?
-> I think people here are more inclined to listen to logic given that it's a debate site, and even if they weren't, logical arguments must succeed at convincing people to some extent
They work on people who are relative fresh slates to an issue. No logical argument will get a planned parenthood worker to become anti abortion (but maybe if they got pregnant and given birth, then they might change their mind off of that, but it could go reverse as well).
->or we would just reach an information heat death where beliefs are the result of random emotions and we can't trust any of our own beliefs
Generally, capitas are stupid. Stupid capitas will trust their own beliefs solely off of emotion.
I'm assuming you would think women who choose the bear are stupid. If so, then try arguing with SkyWalker as to if it makes sense for a woman to choose the bear over the strange man and you will see how useless logic is on capitas like SkyWalker.
It has nothing to do with politics, it doesn't matter if they are Republican, Democrat, or Independent women, they still choose the bear over Remy.
You are nonpartisan creepy.
And yet you wanted to hug me. Like I said, you have no principles.
Left wingers are the first to deny something has to do with politics; the false sense of unity. Your party is the party of platitudes and sugary dishonesty.
->(1) say the line in a non-ragebait way, (2) anticipate common objections they might make, if you know how the convo would go, and (3) respond to those common objections.
2 is going to be hard to persuade someone on because capitas aren't motivated by logic (I would like to think they are, but they aren't).
For example, you've said that you're not a virgin. It is good to be a non virgin as it reduces your risk for pregnancy and STDs/STIs. This is objectively true. And while you may or may not agree, such information won't be enough to get you to stop having sex because at the end of the day, you have an emotional attachment to sex.
People in general have an emotional attachment to various things that I find bad. Logic doesn't work on them. Only emotional responses have a chance of working on them. This means I have no choice but to Rage Bait.
Emotional people don't care about logic; they don't care about hypocrisy even. They care about their own feelings; their own identity.
Minority = Non white, not under 50% of whites.
The prime ingredient that turns any statement into rage bait is intent.
But all political disagreements are Rage Bait whether it's intended or not. I don't intend for my opinions to be Rage Bait, I just accept that they are. Intention and acceptence are 2 different things.
->Group Hug for Remy.
Try bugging a polar bear first, as you argue I'm more scary than a polar bear to women. Left wing men have no morals and no principles to begin with because their environment they were raised on easy mode. There needs to be a way for them to get the right wing benefits of living on hard more without doing the impossible; editing their childhoods.
Opposition to abortion
This is viewed as sexism.
Traditional Marriage
This is viewed as Homophobia.
The Party of Law and Order
... police state.
Public role of religion
... theocracy.
I generally disagree with what Conservatives mean when they say these things, but thats totally fine. That leaves plenty of room for discussion.
Generally is 50%<X<100%. It's just 100% for you.
->It's not rage bait if it's motivated by genuine discussion rather than a desire to enrage people.
But I sort of know how those discussions would go in a way that's extremely predictable, and rather than do the same repetitive stuff like a script, I'd rather just cut to the chase.
Seeing if any of you respond. If I'm being honest, then I think many on the left hold grudges for fun and you ignore me to preserve your mental health because in order to preserve your mental health, it avoids hearing the truth.
Is it possible for an opinion to be socially right wing (defined as the values of the American republican party) and NOT have it to be Rage Bait?
If so, then give examples.
If not, then just admit that when you say, "Ban Rage Bait", you mean Republican social opinions. THEN the GOP can become the Rage Bait party.
But I think I'm white with a minority brain.
you look like the typical white with a minority brain.
Do you think the minority has the higher or lower IQ than the white?
Irrelevant; it's now Lake America.
Only if the courts rule the way I want them too.
You said I have a minority brain and whites stick together for their smaller brains. That means you think minorities have bigger brains and that I have a big brain.
You just called me intelligent.
It's not wrong to kill a killer.
If the death penalty is murder, then imprisonment is kidnapping.
I was the other side. I know how white liberals and white conservatives (as well as minorities) think.
White liberals care about their identity more than other people's lives.
White conservatives care about expansion more than other people's lives.
Minorities care about practicality and honesty.
I'm a white person with a minority brain (and I'm not trans racial; I'm still white).
Change the law. Being anti death penalty isn't defending Lindsay. But Lindsay deserves to be tried like a murderer.
Catch up to what?
Mainly section 3. You can still ban people, but under stricter circumstances than before.
So you would believe the Remy CoC is very similar to the current CoC?
Should the Remy CoC replace the Current Coc?
Deserves to die. Mental health doesn't justify murder. I DARE Side walker or Skeptical to defend Lindsay.
He's done worse for me. Anti man accounts like his are permitted, anti woman accounts like mine almost weren't. Ironic because the mods are men who go against other men (and deny it because of feelings).