Well, Carney has advocated for it 6x on X in the past 2 days and Ursula has mentioned it 0x, so if Carney continues, then at this point, he’s being creepy to the strong independent EU woman who doesn’t want Carney as a partner.
Carney is a creep for violating her boundaries!
Yall act like the pink democrats; so you are a pink democrat.
Why doesn't your hypocritical nation cede all of it's territory to the US?
If a guy wears a cardboard Burger King hat then he speaks for all of Burger King?
If the CEO doesn't overtly condemn it, then yes.
The guy is as embarrassing for Burger King as Remy Brown is for the Republican Party
More of "attacking the arguer and not the argument" (violates the CoC).
Also, McDonalds is now more expensive than Chipolte (adjusted for the size of the meal). Chipolte bowls are massive compared to a burger.
The stereotype of, “Vegan food is more expensive than the meat counterpart” now officially has to die.
Therefore, it's bad to talk about the economy as politicians. The left protests for Gaza more than, "Raise the minimum wage from $15/hr to $20/hr".
Economic issues don't win; social issues do.
I also would think Canadian democrats are in the pink democrat territory because:
Jews; Canadians stole your identity word.
Canadians are pink democrats.
Nation A has 2 equally sized industries make up 100% of it's economy:
Wages will go up 5%. Non-incumbent Politicians will argue the economy is bad because wages went up 5% and costs went up 10% (ignoring the industry that stayed flat) to trash their opponent.
Right now, gas price hikes are higher than wage hikes by %. A bunch of unnamed industries are having their prices hike lower than wage increase (or maybe even falling). There are hundreds of industries in the US; politicians won't name hundreds of industries. The economy does roughly the same pretty much every year. Even during the great depression, most people were employed.
Racist Burger King KICKED OFF OF PLANE for saying the N WORD a SECOND TIME!
A White guy with a Burger King hat says the N word. Burger King's CEO (to the best of my knowledge) never condemned it.
This is tepid endorsement.
To me, the N word is free speech, so I'm indifferent about it. But if you don't like it when whites use the N word, then I advise you to live your values; boycott Burger King; try Chipotle for your fast food. Any black person that enters Burger King I'm going to assume is fine with the N word being said to their face by my white self because Burger King as an establishment has a CEO who is fine with whites using the N word.
If you're Black or Jewish and don't like that, then boycott Burger King.
Black democrats: Blacks and Jews (people who often wear all black clothes).
Pink democrats: Women and trans (who often dye their hair pink).
To a black democrat, their identity words (racist, anti semite) are essentially only used for calls for identity violence and identity slurs (endorsing Hitler/slavery, the N word, the K word). Being anti DEI (while endorsing meritocracy) and anti Israel (while not wanting to fund Israel OR Ukraine or any foreign nation) doesn’t get you labeled as racist or anti semetic. Black democrats want to preserve their identity words for when it actually matters.
To a pink democrat, their identity words (sexist, transphobic) are for all disagreement. If you say you don't believe identifying as a woman makes you a woman, then it’s transphobic. If you say Lindsay Clancy committed murder, then it’s sexist.
Pink democrats got bored, so they stole the identity words from the black democrats that mean more because their words get used for stricter situations.
Black democrats; I’m encouraging you to disassociate with the pink democrats. Label them as insane, cut ties with them, and you’re able to win more moderate voters on the right.
Democrat values are failing because the black democrats want to stay connected to the pink democrats.
European leaders fear that the US annexing Canada (in North America) is going to lead to the US annexing places like Iceland (which are in Europe). It's unrealistic; America isn't trying to integrate Iceland like how Europe is trying to integrate Canada.
The European Union is somehow thinking the US wants to annex Iceland (in Europe) and Greenland (like we can make a state with an island with 50k people and like we can convince US settlers to move to a year round ice box)
Europe; stick to your continent. Go mess with Russia and Ukraine or something. You don’t want to bite the hand that you want to help you with Ukraine. Ukraine I think even conceded some land to Russia beyond Crimea.
Canada is more liked and respected in the world than Trump’s America.
America is like 28% of the world by GDP, so what do you mean? Canada is a puppy to the world; America is like the guard dog. The puppy is liked; but the guard dog is respected (and the guard dog gets the bigger meals).
Canada uses the metric system.
Now, I’m pro metric. Am I a hypocrite? Yes.
But that’s ok because the Canadian identity is massively tied to hypocrisy.
Canadians:
I can list others if needed, but if the Canadian identity is hypocrisy, then it should be encouraged to act as hypocritical as you can when dealing with Canadians.
So as an American endorser of the mectric system, Canada sucks because they use the metric system and America doesn’t. America is better than Canada when we don’t use the metric system and Canada does (and I’m pro metric).
Canadians made hypocrisy acceptable and therefore people should be as hypocritical as they can when dealing with them.
Ive also learned that even the Canadian elbows down people HATE being in the same nation as American blacks (the Jew’s best friend for some reason). Canada seems to be a monolith of segregationist TDS voters and Americans (whether left or right) I think can agree to give the Canadians massive tariffs (100%, no exceptions as even the Quebeckers are anti Trump and don’t want to be around American blacks).
America should Tarriff Canada at 100%. The Canadians deserve it because their core national identity is hypocrisy and in the long run, that’s unchangeable while the nation of Canada exists and doesn’t get absorbed into America.
High gas prices help to combat climate change (which the left used to say was real and a serious problem).
Trump can magically keep the planet so cold the left no longer cares about climate change and cares more about the price of gas.
The issue with the EU doing this is any association status they offer to Canada, they won’t ever offer to India, South Africa, or any other nation outside of Europe regardless of its values (except the white ones) while denying being racist.
It is in Europe’s ethical and reputational interests to leave Canada alone and focus on Russia.
How? My X account always gets its posts deleted when I make the comment.
I’ve learned that most people act on emotion. I don’t follow the herd.
The Canadian government does not want to be absorbed by the United States.
If someone says, “51st state”, then they don’t get censored to keep the illusion of free speech alive.
But if someone makes extremely good arguments for their position, the better the arguments, the more likely they are to get censored.
Now, Mark Carney is trying to do various buisiness deals with the world that he called unprincipled. He’s trying to make Canadian AI.
He will allow the comments calling him “woke” for the illusion of free speech. But the moment someone says, “Hey; there are a lot of AI companies already in existence, investing in this one in particular is a waste of money; it won’t beat the bigger models.”, THEN carney censors you (and the thing with censorship is the only person who knows they got censored is the censored individual and the censoring government).
Any domestic business Carney tries to stimulate or create, there will ALWAYS be an American buisiness that outperforms and will be more profitable because the entrapenuers move to the United States.
Nothing in Canada is worth investing in (not even AI, which is the future) because America will always be more technologically advanced and produce better workers than Canada. There will be bad reviews for American products (addressing not just political anger, but product anger). There’s a difference between calling Chick Fil A anti gay and calling them unhealthy.
Canadian government companies will happily accept all the insults calling them, “woke” to keep the illusion of free speech alive, but they can’t handle insults such as, “Chat GPT is going to be more accepted.”.
Therefore, nothing in Canada is worth investing in and all the creative Canadian minds move to America for lower taxes.
Because given the context of the rest of your posts and the fact that you are converting because you dislike people, I suspect you would not be excited for virtuous reasons.
I dislike 95% of people. They’re emotional; they’re hypocritical, they lie to me face… AND I don’t want to set them on fire. If I saw them on fire, then I’d put them out. If another person sets them on fire, then I’d hate the person that set them on fire and if it was in my power, then I’d execute the arsonist.
I hate people AND I feel anger when they’re burning for eternity. I just don’t want to be around them.
Most people are indifferent if I burn in hell while they preach for love and empathy.
THAT is the ethical difference between me and them.
I mean, presumably you care about other people enough to not like the idea of Hell. And to be honest, I'd probably be more disturbed if you were excited by the idea of Hell.
If God can enjoy hell, why can't person A?
I (ideally) care about others (at least) as much as they care about me. The world doesn't care if I burn in hell. Me not wanting others to burn in hell forever is me being nice.
I don’t love god; I just view him as better than most people. I’m afraid of god and people. God seems to be more tolerable.
Jesus wants you to submit to him out of love, not out of hatred.
I'm not loving someone who burns people in hell forever.
I would endorse 100% tariffs on the parts of Canada that chose to stay in Canada. 50% for being anti America; 50% for being racially exclusionary on the national level. You can ban races from your home, but when it's an entire nation; we got a problem.
You judge individuals based on their history; you judge collectives based on their present.
It seems contradictory in hindsight.
Alberta Elbows down people are too racist for America (not defined as mean words/jokes towards legal residents of races, but wanting to deport non white legal residents).
The left has abandoned empathy and they’re now saying they hate pedophilles and child rapists.
This makes a lot of sense until you realize the left doesn’t define “pedophille” as, “someone who raped kids”. They define, “pedophille” as, “someone who agrees with Trump even once” because in their mind, agreeing with Trump on (ex: repealing Roe) is an example of agreeing with a pedophille on something unrelated to pedophillia.
To them, all conservative and moderates are pro child rape for agreeing with the right even once.
That’s, “He’s a Nazi” all over again.
