RemyBrown

Democrat politician: Vote for ME to make life more affordable.


Reality: If they win, then they spend their term relaxing.


Republican politician: Vote for ME to make life more affordable.


Reality: If they win, then they spend their term relaxing.


Me: People don't vote D or R based on the economy. They vote on social issues. If Trump modified economic policy, then nobody will care. Numbers are boring. If Trump commented on BLM, Gaza, Transgenderism, or some social issue, only THEN do people care about what he said (whether it's left or right wing).


Look at how Brexit occurred. Was it fiscal policy that caused Brexit? No; otherwise it would have occurred way before. People don't notice their net worths drop as a result of taxes. 


Now, what people in the UK DO notice is Muslims, and the left wingers think the Muslims bring diversity while the right thinks they are invaders that are bringing in Shriaiah law.


But nobody votes on the economy/cost of living (every politician will say they want to reduce the cost of living and then not do much about it). They vote on social issues, things that catch their eye.

RemyBrown

->If touching without consent was bad, why would it only apply to some specific body parts and not to others? Sounds like emotional argument to me.


It's society's rules; other people for some reason get very traumatized with non consensual sexual intercourse. They even get traumatized at the sight of other people's dicks (whether it's men or women). I don't understand how they get so traumatized at the sight of other people's dicks (to me, it's just pixels on a screen) and I don't understand how women call themselves straight but find random people's dicks revolting.


But it's what they tell me, so out of respect (not liking, I don't like women for their unearned big egos), but respect for them, even though I won't understand personally how women find strange men's dicks revolting, I won't show any strange women my dick.

RemyBrown

But I don't want too. I don't want to spend the money, risk the STI or STD exposure, become addicted to sex (even though I'm a virgin, I believe sex is addicting because of the lengths that I've seen men will sacrifice to obtain a short term feeling of a woman's vagina), and I don't see the point in sex to begin with.

RemyBrown

->I dont see how. If you grab my hand, my hand is violated. If you grab my penis, my penis is violated. Why would I care more about penis than a hand?


For some reason, people treat genitals like a very special part of the body.


->No, it means you are violating the dead.


So does that mean you should get executed for holding your dead mother's hand like if you raped her dead body?

RemyBrown

->You have earned the scrutiny of law enforcement; they are watching you pumpkin.


That's fine; everything I write on the internet I assume law enforcement is watching. The thing is, Law Enforcement believes in the first amendment a lot.


I've never said I'm going to rape someone (because this will shock you, but I've never penetrated someone consensually and I've never penetrated someone non consensually).


I'm a virgin and proud of it; I'm recovering from a porn addiction that I have regretted picking up, I'm making very good progress with it (I can send screenshot proof if requested).


The cops aren't going to be able to convict me for rape. So if a police officer shows up to my house and wants to ask me stuff that he thinks is suspicious, then as long as he stays outside of my house (unless they have a warrant), I don't mind answering any question they want (with exceptions for things like social security number).

RemyBrown

-> If you moved my hand in my sleep to move chess pieces so you win, it would be as bad as rape because my hand was touched without consent.


No; rape is way worse than holding someone's hand without their consent. That logic means if you hold your dead mother's hand, then it's identical to incest and necrophilia.

RemyBrown

I'm glad that I'm dangerous to your way of thinking.


As of Oct 31 5:00 PM UTC-5, my comment got 3 likes and yours got none.


You have earned indefinite mockery.

RemyBrown

If you win at a game: Happiness, respect.

If you win at sex (player): Happiness, respect.


If you don't play the game: Indifference.

If you don't play at sex (abstinence): Indifference.


If you cheat at the game: No legal penalty.

If you cheat at sex (rape): Very bad felony.


Lesson: Sex is not a game. Otherwise raping a woman would be like cheating at BlackJack.

RemyBrown

->The American military has completed its withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iraq after nearly 20 years of conflict in the region. 


Saudi Arabia did 9/11, not Iraq. So the Israeli army is more moral than the US army.

RemyBrown

How did America respond after 9/11? With a massive genocide of Arabs.


->Its an illegal post in most of the world.


I'm in America though, where it's not illegal.


But Israel is a lot nicer to the Gazans than Americans would be given how Gaza treats them.

RemyBrown

If Gaza sent one rocket at America, then we would blow the shit out of them and not care how many dead civilians occurred because of our revenge. I have no problem with Israel doing the same thing; murdering all 2 million Gazans to take out Hamas. Sometimes genocide is tolerable for self defense. Israel costs the US taxpayers money, but it's $4 billion a year (which is $20/year for someone earning $100k annually). It's practically nothing in exchange for the Israeli media being pro America wrt to our other interests.


I'm a Zionist even if it means genocide, because genocide is acceptable in self defense. If leftists say that I'm hateful or a bigot or whatever, then it's fuel to the fire.


Lefimsults (Leftist Imposed Insults) give me power, so the left has 3 options:


  1. Continue with the Leftimsults (which are counterproductive).
  2. Shut their mouths (which is neutralization).
  3. Steelman all right wing arguments (which if they could do that, then they would have already done it years ago like what they did with gay marriage, girls joining BSA, etc. But they can't).


Forward on a number line is progress. Forward on a number line is to the right.

RemyBrown

->But I am not fine with doing chores. that seems morally wrong.


You identify as 13; do what your parents tell you to do.

RemyBrown

-> such as removing federal recognition, eliminating or restricting many legal rights, and was accompanied by anti-transgender rhetoric and misinformation.


What are the, “many legal rights”? Anti trans rhetoric is free speech. Classifocationism is also free speech. If this is enough to be against human rights, then human rights is simply a bad concept. If human rights is defined as disassociating with others based on their free speech, then America was founded to fight human rights. The majority of Americans hate human rights, and that’s among all racial groups, but especially the immigrant community (who moved here because of the promise of free speech).

RemyBrown

They are biological adults but identify as children and want to be treated as children.


If you tell them, "grow up", then they get defensive. Men don't do that.


Therefore, help them with their unofficial identity of identifying as 17 year old girls and treat them as such (no voting rights, but you can fuck them with consent and you can have them do chores like a child).


If women don't like this, then grow up and act like an adult.


Women can get all the Disney rides that their bf will let them go on for the rest of their lives if they agree to abandon the responsibility of selecting a political candidate that requires hours of studying and only gives you 15 minutes of freedom at your local polling station to vote every 4 years or so.


It sounds like a good deal for anyone that is trans-age (25 years old but identifies as 17).

RemyBrown

No substantive arguments have been made against my position, so it's safe to assume that it's the only correct answer out of the question, "What is worse? Murder or rape?".