I don’t want anyone in combat; war is legalized mass murder.
I don’t want anyone in combat; war is legalized mass murder.
What to join the Church of Donald Trump?
I don’t have to take my religion 100% seriously. That’s the case with all of the others.
You aren't a true follower, if you were, then your religion according to your profile would be the Church of Donald Trump.
Check my profile.
Life hack to MAGA: Now if left wingers hate Trump supporters for their religion, then they are being religious bigots that need to repent at Maro Lago. I don't have to take my religion seriously; the left lets Christians not take their religion seriously.
-> militaries would still exist but be voluntary (and of course no where near as powerful).
That's the goal; the UN would be the world's sole military and bigger nations would be separated into their subdivisions so it would be significantly more difficult for a subdivision to claim independence from the world if it's the size of NJ or so.
They probably could, but why would they want too?
Yes, because transgender leftists flee political disagreement as it's their instinct. They think ignorance is bliss (aka they love to not know). Chris Rock calls these people, "N!99as" and that man of color is correct.
If they get uncomfterable over pronouns disagreements, then they're just pussies. If someone referred to me as, "she", then it's obvious that I would disagree, but it's too petty to get angry about.
Antifa never conquored any US states.
->Because there's a Federal military to stop Oklahoma from trying this. So would the UN have an army? How is that preferable to the current situation?
I'd be fine with the UN having an army. It's preferable to the current situation because the UN army would cost less for the taxpayers of the planet than each of their own collective militaries combined. In addition, I'd also break up various large countries that often have big military budgets into their subdivisions, so the UN military wouldn't even have to be that large.
Just have the national guard socially transition to become cops and help our police force.
->We've already been through what 99% of people who say TWAW are actually saying and you continue to pretend otherwise. You are beyond obsessed with this imaginary bogeyman. Get help.
My religion is against getting "help".
What if they don't?
You are talking about police, not military. Police don't bomb tens of thousands of people. The military does.
->Nobody, because we'd all be living under the global hegemony of the first country to violate this agreement. All hail our benevolent Namibian overlords!
Even though many people are tagged, the above argument is more or less your argument.
My refutation is that's like saying in the US, where no state has a significant military budget on it's own, then we would all be at the mercy of the Oklahoma Overlords. Why would Namibia want to conquer the world? It's like Oklahoma trying to conquer the entire US.
A country is an arbitrary shape on a map.
-> “Have your groceries gotten cheaper? Has your health insurance premium gone down?”
Bro; people don't vote on economics. If Trump or Harris raises or lowers the price of gasoline, then no additional votes are won. If Trump said, "Men can get pregnant", "Transwomen are women" (which anyone that believes a woman can have a dick also believes that men can get pregnant) on the other hand, then he gets cancelled by the MAGA people. Whereas if Harris said, "Transwomen are men", then the trans community would freak out, but they only make up .3% of the population and pretty much nobody else would vote hate her for it; in fact, she would gain among other voters that went the GOP direction.
Any straight man that believes that TWAW should be consistent and have no problem dating one and having consensual sex with them. If they're women, then you should have no issue with doing that.
But it's all talk as virtually every man that says, "TWAW" doesn't want to date them and if they are, then when their friends inevitably call them gay over it, then you would cower away from it due to lack of principles of the TWAW position that they have.
What if you use they/them for transwomen/transmen? That eliminates the concept of misgendering.
->You can say that, but many even oppose trans gender care.
This is different than classification.
-> I also support self-determination when it comes to names.
Names and pronouns are different. Although if you think about it, everyone can use they/them pronouns. Maybe that should be the standard where John Cena and Ariana Grande all use the same pronouns (they/them). Pronouns only exist as one syllable words because the majority of Anglophone people have names that are more than one syllable.
You are a bitchy and petty asshole if you think calling Caitlyn Jenner a man is the same as taking away their human rights because you disagree with a classificationist issue.
->I don't think you have to agree with the majority of black people's views to "stick up for" black people (as in supporting their rights).
You don't have too, but it compromises the LGBT people's rights.
->But supporting civil rights doesn't mean accepting the statement "expanding LGBT rights into Africa from Europe is neocolonialism."
They're different, but if you want to expand LGBT rights into Africa from Europe, then that's neo colonialism (which a lot of left wingers take issue with).
-> If this hypothetical Jammal exists then he's a delusional disgusting individual with regards to how he views the trans community. That is completely irrelevant to whether I would advocate for his rights.
Fine; so transgenders who agree with you would fight for the rights of transphobes who will never reciprocate it. Good to know so then blacks don't feel the need to stick up for transgenders if BLM gets reparations.
Would you want to associate with Jammal? If not, then you would be willing to fight for the controversial rights of those that you would disassociate with? I couldn't do that. If I disapprove of someone, then I don't have to kill them, but I don't have to save them either.
What if the transgender issue costs left wingers blue states in governor elections because you imported a lot of transphobic migrants that you could have easily deported and caused those states to stay blue and trans friendly?
Every nation worldwide had an annual military budget of $0 annually?
Then who would we need a military to protect us from? Space aliens?
The issue is not, "Do you get to chop off your dick at 30?". The issue is, "Is a TW classified as a woman or man?" Men and women have equal rights in society (or at least that's the optimum). Enslaving either is and should be illegal. Therefore, classifying a TW as a man based on chromosome absolutism does not violate their human rights to own themselves and anyone who disagrees with that is a bitchy and petty drama queen.
Nobody would say that classifying TX as a SW state or a SE state violates the human rights of Texans.
The average Indian IQ is 115. Anyone with an IQ of under 115 is stupid; anyone with an IQ between 115 and 130 is teachable; anyone with an IQ of 130 or higher is smart.
50% of Indians are stupid; but so is like 86% of America.
No, it's because they view LGBT right as western imperialism and as white culture.
This map shows where LGBT rights are almost always the strongest (white people land):
If there is an individual black person (Jammal) that happens to view Transwomen as degenerate men pretending to be women so they can rape little girls in bathrooms to fulfill their pedophilia urges (and this black person believes the majority of transgenders are pedophiles that should be burned and/or lynched), then would you act with your principles and advocate for their rights even if you know they won't reciprocate or go blue MAGA with it and not necessarily join the KKK, but just be indifferent to if that hypothetical transphobic black suffers?
Post 3 is what the majority of blacks in America think of transgenders. Educate yourself Double R.
Thanks for answering the question.
->Sticking up for people's rights is about looking at various situations and being able to tell the difference between right and wrong. No part of that necessitates that one segregate people into different teams and pick a side.
That would make sense if it was LGBT vs Canadians (because Canadians are pro LGBT and LGBT are pro Canada). This is LGBT vs blacks (when LGBT people are very pro BLM but Blacks usually don't reciprocate). The majority of blacks believe that TW are men (and it's higher than any other racial group).
->
->Fact is you can usually get racial minority A to be racist toward racial minority B if you 1) make them feel like they're at least better than racial minority B or 2) make them feel like it earns them acceptance with a group of higher status
In left wing minds, white male MAGA people are that group of higher status because left wingers believe in white male conservative privilege.