My goal is more realistic I think.
My goal is more realistic I think.
You know more about me than my desire to be a lifelong virgin.
->Better to be a virgin than a rapist, but most people are retarded and will treat virgin guy worse than a rapist.
I don't think that's true. People have made fun of me for being a virgin and I didn't care. If someone is a rapist, then they keep that to themselves. You can find shirts saying, "Virginity Rocks!". Try finding a shirt that says, "Rape Rocks!". You won't be able too.
Virgins are treated better by society than a rapist. It's common sense.
->Better to be a virgin than a rapist, but most people are retarded and will treat virgin guy worse than a rapist.
I don't think that's true. People have made fun of me for being a virgin and I didn't care. If someone is a rapist, then they keep that to themselves. You can find shirts saying, "Virginity Rocks!". Try finding a shirt that says, "Rape Rocks!". You won't be able too.
Virgins are treated better by society than a rapist. It's common sense.
And besides, getting pussy is too hard (before and after); I will just give up.
And besides, getting pussy is too hard (before and after); I will just give up.
You sure it's not just:
I'm volcel, not incel.
Life hack:
A woman's consent does not matter if you are abstinent.
I'm going to exercise my sexual freedom to not have sex and there is nothing a woman can do to stop me!
Virginity ROCKS!
Isn't Gavin a transphobe though? It's surprising the left will like him after learning that. Or does the left endorse transphobia now? Like, what's your game plan?
Accepting Gavin = Accepting (or at least tolerating) the transphobia that Gavin brings.
Comprehend the equation; whether or not you accept it is up to you.
I've imagined it and I think it's a good idea. What's wrong with enacting the policy?
In many respects, I'm a progressive; I want to make this country progressively more right wing.
Not all progress is left wing, and despite that left wingers will call themselves, "progressives" as a marketing label because their ideas are generally anti status quo (and everyone is pro technological progress, so some very decent left wing marketers decided to use this term to try and win more votes for what are often bas ideas), right wing progress is still progress.
If left wing progress is the only real progress, then you can ideologically believe something that is pretty much as left wing as possible (banning farming because it is bad for the planet as all farming is at least somewhat bad for the environment; it leads to extinct species) and it would hold up.
But technological progress, while 100% approve of it, it is hard to produce. Left wing "progress" is easy to produce, but many disapprove of it.
Don't treat both versions of progress equally.
->Discrimination is an inbuilt coping and survival strategy that we all possess, and it cannot be fought.
Make sure you don't go overboard with it though; I don't want to behead all blacks just because one guy named Tyrone raped a virgin white woman. Only behead Tyrone for rape (and give Tyrone due process before you kill him if you kill him).
What's wrong with discrimination?
Without discrimination, everyone would have to be pansexual or asexual because hetero and homosexuals discriminate based on gender.
But why do you guys pick pop? I thought they would pick rock and roll (or maybe rap). But you guys are into pop (which I thought pop music was for women and homosexuals). We could add black dudes to the list, but why do you guys like pop? I like Metallica because I'm an adrenaline junkie.
If you judge them by how they work out:
If you judge them by their music preferences:
Why is that?
Any black male immigrants can fill me in on why you guys do this? I think even the black female immigrants largely emulate you.
I'm not even hating them for it; their preferences are their preferences. But why though?
Even Side walker (very left wing) is anti Mandami. That's saying something. I'm anti Trump and anti Mandami.
Mandami is fringe af!
Even Side walker (very left wing) is anti Mandami. That's saying something. I'm anti Trump and anti Mandami.
Mandami is fringe af!
Even Side walker (very left wing) is anti Mandami. That's saying something. I'm anti Trump and anti Mandami.
Mandami is fringe af!
->I mean, working out would benefit him
If you fail a workout set, then that's not immoral.
The issue isn't that he failed, the issue is he thought posting his failure as a campaign ad would be a good idea.
->I also don't think being unable to bench 135 disqualifies you to be mayor, but I do think it should be disqualifying if you are stupid enough to do it on camera during a campaign.
Alright; so then we agree that Mandami should not be mayor. Correct?
Mandami is 33 years old and can't bench 135 while looking like he's in shape (I heard the weights may have even been 35 on each side, they seem small for 45s)? He needed massive help. If on his own, then he might be able to bench maybe 55-60.
90% of 33 year old dudes can bench 135 and the few that can't are twigs.
AOC is 5'4", so Mandami might be 5'7". Pretty short for an Indian American man (average height is 5'10").
I think it's possible that Mandami was born a girl.
Nothing wrong with that. I wouldn't refuse to vote for someone based on whether or not they are trans.
But I think Mandami might be transgender and in NYC, coming out as trans is a positive for election purposes.
I don't believe every conspiracy; ex: I believe Obama was born in Hawaii.
This one though seems believable.
->Not sure why you would conclude that. The obvious answer would be that he is no longer will to boost Elon Musk's platform, plus he's been posting like crazy on truth central.
Fair.
-> It's not protection against a Russian nuclear strike, it's only a deterrence, and one I just explained might not be enough in the event of the fallout from Russian aggression against a NATO Aly, which was the whole point.
It's a strong enough deterrence to where I would call it protection. The ultimate protection is eliminating the Russian state, but as long as Russia exists, you can only deter even if the US spends $1 trillion on Ukraine.
->And as a side note, it's kind of hard to rely on the strength of NATO as a defense of what Trump is doing given how badly Trump has weakened NATO.
NATO has retained all of it's current members, so I don't believe we are weaker from that aspect. In fact, ever since Russia invaded Ukraine, Sweden and Finland joined NATO (which you should give BIDEN credit for), but Russia invading Ukraine ironically helped expand NATO.
-> You asserted that Putin tells his election officials to report false numbers that make him the winner. I asked why do you think they do that, as in what is their motivation for going along with this.
They get bribed by Putin's government. If he offers them $2 million each of Russian tax money to rig the election in his favor, then they would corporate for the money. It's dishonest money, but from their perspective, who cares? They don't care about morals over $2 million. When you have $2 million to gain if you cheat, what incentive do you have to be honest? Every politician is like this (unless they want to give up power, which people will sometimes do voluntarily; it's happened on DART before; we switched head mods before).
->You said "every leader does this", as in fakes their election numbers to secure victory. Prove that claim or admit it's a stupid claim.
If a leader wants power, then why would any world leader have an incentive to be honest about election results if they lose? None. What incentive do they have to lie? Power; money; validation from their constituents. I mean, in 2020, Yang got a lot of name recognition over UBI. The idea would have done wonders in NYC. 2021 NYC election, Yang gets clobbered despite his massive name recognition compared to the others. Why? It's because elections are for show and he couldn't bribe the pollsters with enough money to get himself to be the mayor of NYC. The pollsters probably told him that if he calls them rigged, then they would make sure he "disappears". So his keep his mouth shut on the rigged election to save his skin.
The world is pretty dishonest because there is an incentive to be dishonest.
Politics is a show.
You may hate him so much that you want him to be eaten by piranhas. You may love him so much that you want him to step his foot in a pie that you eat as a fetish.
One thing though as of the time of this post, is undeniable:
The guy hasn't posted to his X in about a month (https://x.com/realDonaldTrump). He used to post several times daily but as the POTUS, he is not? Even a few months ago, he would at least post several times a week. Signs of dementia.
He should step aside and let Vance take over. Be honest over who is running the show.
->No idea what this has to do with anything we discussed
NATO is America's protection against Russia.
->And why do you think they listen to him?
Because politics is for show. Why hasn't the world united into one nation by now? It's because divided countries were people get killed and are worse off are entertaining for the politicians and their donors. They have to use some vague, "cultural differences" or, "scary globalist George Soros" bullcrap to get the people to accept the divisiveness.
->I can't take you seriously when you say such a stupid thing.
All right wing opinions are stupid to you, so I'm proud to have said a stupid thing by your logic; it's called being someone who isn't in the democrat religion.
See above.
-> you would honestly prefer to never enjoy food, beverages, cozy blankets, orgasms, any of the pleasures that come with fulfilling our needs?
I would like it if I didn't need any of these things to survive. But I don't like expenses.
We are not in the same house. You are a troll!
I have no idea who you are.
->This isn't a risk one can just shrug off.
Shrug off is going into the woods thinking there is no chance that you will see a bear. But his threat here would be akin to walking in the woods with bear mace to protect yourself. Bear mace and NATO are both insurance.
->Putin literally murders anyone who opposes him all so he can illegally hold onto power.
He doesn't have too; he can hire someone to go into the election board room and give him 90% of the vote even if he only gets 45%. Every leader does this, Putin would rather give off the illusion of a 90% approval rating and our politicians like having it be a bigger show with a red state vs blue state election battle over the battleground states.
Every POTUS is a mafia boss.