COVID is old news. By 2020 standards, everyone in 2025 is very far right wing on COVID now.
COVID is old news. By 2020 standards, everyone in 2025 is very far right wing on COVID now.
My post is so boring that you found it worth your while to respond to it.
But fine. We can add those to the list. It doesn't disprove my point, so my points are uncontested and therefore, assumed to be correct.
->Tax the rich and make housing affordable.
->He's not Cuomo.
What is wrong with Cuomo? Most I've seen is SA convictions, but that's like disqualifying someone over a DUI; they are both misdomenears.
Like, it seems very cult of personality.
He wants to abolish private property! Like, who does that?
Current Insult list so far:
Fine.
They will say I'm an incel for saying men are better than women on average; I'm a proud incel.
They will say I'm transphobic for refusing to believe that a woman is anyone that identifies as a woman is a woman; alright; I'm a proud transphobic.
They will call me evil for supporting some hate speech (aka GOP speech), alright; I am an evil person who supports hate speech.
They will call me a fascist for supporting annexing Canada, alright; I am a facsist.
It's gone from, "I support the current thing" to, "I support the current insult".
At least people like Double_R attempts to steelman my points, so I respect him.
But insults when left wingers (I could give some examples, but I don't want it to be a callout thread) uses them don't mean anything anymore; they have been abused (kind of like woke and socialist for the right).
The next time a liberal gives me a vague insult, I'm going to say, "Thank you for the win; but be more upfront next time about your concession.". Insulting your opponents is for children.
You can insult me, but you can't refute me, so I know that you are an idiot.
And here you are, on a forum that I labeled as RageBait, giving me attention that you claim I'm desperate for.
I'm an incel by your definition; all men that call out women are incels (which is a lot of men).
-> Average woman has brain size of an 11 year old boy.
Then can women consent? 11 year olds can't consent.
All anti femenism is incel blather to you, so I don't care if you think I'm an incel.
But if a woman has kids, then she is tied to the man that got her pregnant (unless he divorces her, but then she will have to find a step dad). I'm not trashing on stepdads, but many men don't want to become a step dad.
A woman without kids should be treated exactly like a man; if she makes a mistake, then she should be held accountable for it.
A woman can make 100 mistakes and men will forgive her. If a man makes 20 mistakes, then women don't forgive.
Anything relevant a woman can do a man can do better on average (except for one thing; having biological kids).
Men are stronger; men are faster; men earn more money; men work harder (it's easy for a man to vacuum, do dishes, cook, etc; but try getting a woman who isn't an immigrant to work as a CEO job; it's possible, but a lot less likely) (this is why immigrant women are the best women even if they don't have their papers); hell; men are even better at raising kids (kids raised by single fathers do better than kids raised by single mothers). Men are less willing to, but more able because men have been through more stress than white western women. Men even (if they choose) can look more femininely attractive than women can (I'm not making this about transgenderism, but https://www.youtube.com/@VladNcl. Vlad looks hotter in his feminine costume than most women that I see).
You circumsize a man; it's commonplace. You circumsize a woman; it's a human rights abuse. Men can handle more pain. A woman giving childbirth is less painful than a man getting kicked in the balls. I've been kicked in the balls; it's no big deal. I'm over it in 5 minutes. If a woman gets goosed non consensually, then she's scarred for weeks. I've been non consensually goosed; I recovered in 20 minutes because I'm a man and men have been through a lot worse than women, therefore, men are tougher and superior because of a tough upbringing (on average; exceptions exist; I'm sure women in Africa have had it tougher than me and if they become CEOs of companies, then I will happily say they are superior to me. I think Oprah is objectively superior to me. But the generic man is superior to the generic woman).
Anything women can do, men can do better (with one exception; giving birth (and not even THAT is true according to the left anymore because they claim men can get pregnant) ).
Women with kids get special protected status; women without kids should get treated like men (and that often means worse because they have dealt with less struggle in life due to their upbringing). But any woman that wants or has kids I will refuse to date because I don't want kids (but other guys might).
If I'm sexist for saying that, then fine; I'm sexist. But it's not as sexist as saying that men are worse than bears, so it is what it is. Sexism is now acceptable in society.
If America gets sold for $50 trillion, then who collects the money? Does every American get a $150,000 check to become Chinese? How is that different than every Chinese person getting a $50,000 check and being in the same nation regardless?
How does China benefit from buying the USA? They have more land, but also more people to manage.
Situation 1: China buys America.
Situation 2: America buys China.
These are identical.
Nations are random lines on a map.
You can only respond with images insulting me; not steelmanning. Boring af!
What is an Incel? Like, by definition. Involuntarily celibate. I'm celibate by choice, so your definition is inaccurate and rejected.
A conservative guy told me that because I said a conservative veteran was wrong on something (the claim that segregation is worse than social media), that I hate America and I should leave it.
Alright. I hate America then and I refuse to leave. If that pisses you off, then Trump Trailer Tears are Tasty on The Tongue (but they might have too much hamburger fat in them).
If you ask someone, "Would you rather be with a strange woman or a strange man?", then both genders select the strange woman virtually 100% of the time.
This is even knowing neither the man nor the woman is going to rape them.
Women prefer the women because they prefer their own kind. And men prefer women because they get hypnotized by women's looks too easily.
If this person says, "Free Palestine":
Then a normie with no political opinions says, "Oh; it's his opinion".
If this person says, "Free Palestine":
Then a normie with no political opinions says, "She is very sad and beautiful; I will support freeing Palestine".
Even an Actual Pro Zionist will have a harder time criticizing the woman than the man because they get hypnotized by looks. An Anti Zionist lightly cheers on the man and loudly cheers on the woman.
This means men get more scrutiny for the things they say than women.
If women want equal voting rights to men, then the things they say should get criticized under the exact same terms than if a man says those things.
This requires that men turn off their lizard brains that soften statements for women and judge them identically (this requires continuous effort).
But this is why women are dumber than men on average; it's not biology; it's culture. They have been subject to less intellectual pressures.
A Minimum IQ of 120 should be required to vote regardless of gender.
->MAGA is clearly a racist backlash to our first black president.
The guy who threw the sandwich and got arrested was white.
At least nobody will call it racist.
->The Irish are not at all like the ethnic "in our culture we care about extended family!" trope. I'd actually say we are actually colder than anglo-saxons.
I don't care if you care about your extended family. But have limits to it. You can be emotionally mad if someone r@ped your mother; but if someone insults your mother (with words), then grow up! Accept the disrespect! It's words. Get over it!
It showed up blank.
I don't know how to do that. Can you send screenshots?
Eric Adams gives Trump credit on his big issue.
Cuomo threatens to move to MAGA state if he loses. He said it's a joke, but he's lying.
->The difference is that Mamdani it so far appears, actually cares about the thinks he's campaigning on, whereas Trump just recognized what buttons to push in order to really up the stupid people.
Yeah; but the supporters of Mandami and Trump have similar ideologically puritan personalities (at least in my experience). There were Mandami supporters that thought I was a Xenophobe because I support desalination plants (they argued it was colonizing the oceans and taking water away from the fishes). Another blocked me over Israel (when I wasn't even being Zionist, I was suggesting bringing the Israelis here to save both the Gazans and Israelis). They were saying that Israelis wanted to murder us. I told them it was like a .0005% chance Israelis were murderers. They said, "Numbers are sadistic!". They are insane!
Another hardcore anti Zionist disassociated with me because the candidate I voted for was anti Zionist, just the wrong anti Zionist (I voted for Chase Oliver; they wanted Stein).
The pro Mandami crowd is insane!
->Addressed this nonsense in the other thread. Respond to it.
I'd have to find the link.
Women: We are scared of strange men at night!
Me: So would you like it if there were no more strange men at night?
Women: Yes! All men should be at home at night!
Me: You want sundown towns again? Your opinion, but I don't agree. But if you believe this, then apply it to everyone regardless of gender.
Women: No; we just want men to stop raping us!
Me: That's wishful thinking. But sundown towns are more realistic than ending rape. Do you want sundown towns?
To the Mandami supporters that I have heard from, it does.
They saw what Trump did in 2016 (appealing to the hard right base and they saw that it worked) and they are trying to emulate that. This means anyone that agrees with the right only 5% of the time they are openly cancelling, disassociating with, and exiling from their ranks. This includes Cuomo and Adams.
So your opinion that TW can't compete with cis women in women's sports (I think this is what you agree with), is cancelable by the left, because to them, this means you think TW are men (because the belief that they should compete with women in sports is directly tied to the belief as to whether or not they are women).
Definition of mansplaining:
"a portmanteau of "man" and "explaining," referring to the act of a man explaining something to someone, typically a woman, in a condescending or patronizing way, assuming she lacks knowledge or understanding of the topic"
I believe anytime a man disagrees with a woman, then she will say it's mansplaining because all disagreement is condescending to many women.
So if this is the definition women want to use, then men need to mansplain way more.