RemyBrown

The US spending tax dollars should only be to help people; not to bomb their houses.

I don't see the issue with the UN enforcing an annual military budget of every country on the planet to be $0. If the country is very big (the US, China, etc), then break them up into their subdivisions and lets make the world one nation so there is no more point in spending military money anywhere, which is a waste of money that harms people because their houses get bombed.

Military spending would then make as much sense as Michigan invading Ohio for the Toledo strip.

Freedom of movement for everyone; yeah; Brazilians can move to America, but Americans can also move to Hungary or Manitoba or Alberta. I'd like the option of freely moving to Guyana if I wanted too or some place like that without government restrictions.

The left: Anyone that votes republican is voting against their own interests!

Me: You never bothered to find out what my interests are, but alright. By your logic, if me being open to what both people say acts against my own interests, then I act against my own interest. Add that insult to the list of, "I support the current insult" (VAMI) (Voting Against My Interests).

Trump said this; it was enough for me to be convinced that he was racist and I preferred Harris to Trump in November of 2024 as Hispanics and Asians shifted massively towards Trump.

I'm just saying if you are non-FBA and in 2024, preferred Harris to Trump, then you should get the N word pass. You can't hate black people and women; you preferred Harris to Trump as the majority of voters of your non-FBA status didn't.

Harris got nice legs too; her Jewish husband is lucky af (but he earned it)! Women's consent for sex is important.

I don't hate black people; I want to abolish ICE and let all of them Haitians in documented or not. They do voodoo? Freedom of religion. At the same time, I want the N word back.

I hate blacks less than either Harris or Trump; they both would kick them out if they didn't have papers; I wouldn't.

Principled Libertarians (anti ICE) and comics should get the N word pass.

1. Pew Research in 2022 said 60% of the US population is transphobic and this exact % doesn't want transwomen competing with ciswomen in women's sports (party statistics are identical minus margin for error)(1). They are different questions that will get identical statistics. This % is even higher among black people (who vote very left wing).
2. In 2017, this was 52%. Now in 2025, it's 79% (2), bipartisan agreement to the claim as well. Only 18% think TWAW; and among men, it may be 15%.
3. If you are a straight identifying man who is with a TW in a dating context because you think they are women, then you are going to be overwhelmingly surrounded by people who think you are a homosexual. This makes even the vast majority of the 15% scared to deal with trans people because they are going to get viewed as nasty by virtually everybody, especially since the 15% is going to tend to be very left wing dudes (who are flat out scared of conservatives when they are so numerous).
4. The left politicians end up dodging this question as, "culture war distraction". They are wrong. It's a culture war distraction if it's like "defunding the police" (DTP). Both left wing opinions here poll at about 18%, but the left politicians will denounce DTP very quickly (even in a democrat primary). THAT is why they can call DTP a culture war distraction. The left does not call TW men in a primary (at least yet). When the left changes their position, THEN they can call the issue a culture war distraction. Until then, they can't.

87% of black people voted against Trump in 2024; among FBA people, it might have been 92%, because the blacks that are immigrants are often MAGA.

It's not because FBAs are this disease that should be eliminated. It's because their culture influenced how Trump acts. You don't see any Trump like figures in any other western country (not based on policy, but vibes).

Trump roasts people. Trump uses nicknames for people. You don't see Putin saying, "Loco Zelensky". You don't see Danielle Smith using terms like, "Crazy Carney" or, "Tye dye Treadeau". But you will hear Trump saying, "Meatball Ron".

That is a black move; and it's funny.

From my experience:

1. If you tell a black person, "end police brutality and climate change is a hoax!", then they often say, "I respect that". Black people are open minded (even if they lean left), they realize people are going to disagree; they may refute what you say, but black people don't get violent over a disagreement that doesn't concern them.
2. If you tell a trans person, "transwomen are women and climate change is a hoax!", then they often say, "You are trying to show cover for FACSISM!! FUCK YOU NAZI SCUM!!!!". Trans people think they are open minded (because feeling open minded feels a lot better than being close minded).

Black people don't look to be offended; trans people do. The non-binary people I met are actually some of the good transgenders; they are non-binary on the gender spectrum and they realize that some people are politically free thinkers (which they code as nonbinary).

THIS is why I hope the democrat in 2028 calls transgenders delusional scumbags. This song speaks facts (although he makes it about Israel, I extend this to other issues):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRVauA-rzdE

And, the politicians like Pete Buttigieg and Zohran Mandami steelmanning aren't enough; the street left wingers have to copy Pete and Zohran.

They both have 0 people blocked on BlueSky for example:

https://clearsky.app/petebuttigieg.bsky.social/blocking

https://clearsky.app/zohrankmamdani.bsky.social/blocking

You chase people away, Trump and MAGA absorbs them; simple.

Question: What is the correlation (r value) between the physical strength of Blacks (Group A) vs Jews (Group B)?

Naive person: The r value between the physical strength of Group A and B is 0.

Xenophobe: The r value between the physical strength of Group A and B is 1.

Realist: The r value between the physical strength of Group A and B is in between 0 and 1.

Generally speaking, when I talk to these groups, they talk to me as if I'm 3 years old.

Lets hear some of them:

Jerry Springer (Jew)

Gay guy

Therapists are the same way

Women do this too

I'm an adult; talk to me like I'm an adult; your voices are too god damn condescending and they make me have a physical sensation to feel stupid, infantile, and Juvenile.

Here are some role models for the women, therapists, gays, and Jews (party affiliation not considered):

Good vibed Jew

Good vibed gay

Good vibed woman

Good vibed therapist

The right believes that anyone who is anti Trump is a communist (until 2028, then it will be anyone who is against the republican nominee then). Alright, then the majority of the country is communist right now and a sizable part of the country will be communist in 2028.

I am a proud communist simply because I'm anti Trump and that's enough to make you a communist according to republicans.

This is a really big dick right here:

Dick Pic (it's a really big one), 1st image; I got an article.

Apparently, people get very scared of actual dic pics (for reasons that make no sense to me. It's just a 2 dimensional image), so because of this, I will make this disclaimer.

The picture is of someone who acts like a dic. It's not an actual dic. I don't want to get banned for this.

The left believes that anyone who has at least one right wing or indifferent opinion on any of the following issues:

1. Police brutality
2. Reparations
3. Trump
4. Abortion
5. Immigration
6. Transgenderism
7. Annexing Canada
8. The CDC
9. Censoring Palestinian Activists
10. Being an Adolf Hitler supporter
11. Free speech for Fascists
12. Giving Hitler credit on any controversial opinion Hitler had.
13. Edgy humor

Is a fascist.

I guess then I'm a fascist (I have 6 of these beliefs).

I'm anti reparations, I want to annex Canada, I don't trust the CDC, I want free speech for fellow fascists like myself (which means I don't think their speech is a big deal).

I also give Hitler credit on some opinions he had (ex: vegetarianism, as I'm vegan). Because of the Holocaust (which happened, millions of people got killed, they weren't all Jews, and it was horrible), it is enough that Hitler was horrible because of the Holocaust. But I liked his vegetarianism.

I also like edgy humor.

All of these things make me somewhat fascist. I'm left wing on every other issue I have on the list.

How fascist are the people here?

First, it was, "transphobic".

Next, it was, "worse than a bear".

Now, it is "evil".

What do you think will be next?

They are both good looking individuals. If the guy says this statement, then people (rightfully) say that he's a crazy loon that should end up in the mental hospital.

People wouldn't treat the woman like that for saying the exact identical statement.

That is a societal problem that needs to be addressed. I think men and women fall for this roughly equally.

So what I do is every time I look at a woman, I don't care how beautiful she is, I ignore all of it when she talks.

If women want equal voting rights to men, then they need to be equally scrutinized for what they say.

Non-forfeit debates are essentially a popularity contest.

I know I'm not popular on here because everyone from both parties pretty much requires 100% agreement with your politics in order to like you.

If you tell a democrat, "We should cut the military budget, and BECAUSE OF THAT, we should stop funding Ukraine.", then the democrat thinks you're a fascist enabler (which I'm fine with that title because ad hominins don't work on me).

If you tell a republican, "Picking strange men over bears dehumanizes men but it ALSO dehumanizes people to view Haitians as eating pets in Springfield.", then the republican thinks you're a socialist enabler (which I'm fine with that title because ad hominins don't work on me).

I know I'm highly unpopular here.

Therefore, if I debate with a left winger, then the right wingers won't turn out to vote for me in a non-FF debate because they hate my guts (vice versa applies for if I debate a right winger). But the opponent's respective party will turn out for them. It pays to be a partisan hack. It's in one's personal interests to be a partisan hack. You get more votes; more of a social group; people care about being socially accepted more than being correct.

It's just immoral for me to do this, but I also don't want to lose debates when I clearly made the better argument, but everyone that agrees with me doesn't turn out to vote for me because I pissed them off on some other issue.

A lot (not all, but a lot) of MAGA people I met will get really offended if I refer to certain people as, "Anchor babies", "Me no speakies", "Fresh off the boat", "Nacho taco chimmy changas", "Wetbacks", etc because they think it's offensive to them.

These same people then will call for separating these wetbacks from their anchor baby kids.

I'm pretty sure separating kids from harmless parents is a whole hell of a lot more offensive to them than calling the kids, "anchor babies" and the parents, "Fresh off the boat".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ5HKswUzD4.

Lesson: The smart black people (usually) go into medicine and the smart white people (usually) go into finance.

If you are a MAGA person that doesn't consider this a deal breaker to Trump, then you don't consider someone supporting pedophillia to be a deal breaker.  Lets call a spade a spade.

I believe that nobody is above being made fun of, including myself.

This thread proves it.

Roast me as hard as you can.

I support them doing their humor.

The same would be true if they were making fun of trans people or any left wing group.

Both major parties support making fun of only degenerates and not real Americans (degenerate = person they disagree with, real American = person they agree with).

I'd rather make fun of everybody as a matter of principle.

Anyone that disagrees with the following statement is transphobic:
“A woman is anyone that identifies as a woman.”

I didn't want this to be the definition, but the left insisted that this is the definition.

Alright; 66% of the US population is transphobic then (https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/02/26/americans-have-grown-more-supportive-of-restrictions-for-trans-people-in-recent-years/).  

Doesn't bother me to be transphobic; we're the majority.  It was 52% 8 years ago (https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/06/28/americans-complex-views-on-gender-identity-and-transgender-issues/).  

And Trump's term has only started.  Imagine what it will be in 3 years.  In 2026, the democrats aren't even running on trans rights (1st amendment rights > trans rights because free speech rights > bathroom rights) like they were in 2022; it's all economic.

When the most popular transwoman activist is a broke meth user that is 28 years old and has to live with their family out of economic desperation (and meth is even on their family wall, implying that there is a good chance their entire family uses meth and supportive of their meth habit), and only 10% of the US population even supports legalizing meth (implying that 90% would send this individual to jail or rehab (aka drug conversion therapy) ), this is not looking very optimal for the trans community.

To be transphobic is to be normal, to be a trans ally is to be inconsistent.

I hate women.  Women owe me stuff.  I am entitled to things from women.

Is it sex?  No.
Is it a relationship?  No.
Is it a positive opinion of me?  No.

Is it a non-negative opinion of me?  No.

Is it being viewed better than a bear because of my chromosomes, age, and my stranger status?  YES!!!

I am entitled to be viewed better than a bear whether I know the woman or not.  Women can't even give me THAT.

I didn't hate women as a group before the, “Man vs Bear” situation.  Now, I hate women because they dehumanize me.

Man vs Bear made me extremely misogynist.  Women said they are worried rando dudes would rape them.  Imagine if I said, “I'd rather be with a bear than a woman I don't know; the bear never falsely accused anyone of SA.”  Nobody would stand for that; not even the manosphere.

You play stupid games, you get the majority of Hispanic and Asian men voting for, “The immigrants are eating the pets!”
 

And I'm going to hate any woman that I don't know (but not worse than a bear because I'm not a hypocrite) until the feminists admit just how much they fucked up with this one.  And the left has conceded gracefully before; they did it with the vaccine mandates and “Believe women” and I don't accuse the left of supporting this anymore.

But, “Man vs Bear” is vastly different than, “Believe women” because at least with the ladder, you can logically understand why someone would do that.  Evidence is hard to come by with r@pe cases; victims feel a way I can't comprehend; I take them at their word, but I also don't want to be falsely accused myself.  Man vs Bear allowed left wingers to simultaneously claim that calling a trans man a woman violates their human rights while saying that a trans man is worse than a bear is not a violation of their human rights.

Women now have said that due to men arguing, they actually prefer murder over (not just rape, but arguing).

Now, everyone has their own pain tolerance for which they prefer death, and I (don't agree) but respect preferring murder to rape.

But murder to arguing?  Buddy, with that mentality, you would have to abide by one of the 3 policies:

1. Legalize murdering women (because it's legal to argue with them and they think arguing is worse).

2. Make arguing with a woman punishable with life imprisonment or the death penalty (basically the penalty for murder).

Both of those are crazy, but you would have to accept it with the belief that arguing is worse than murder.  Yes, men argue; they do it loudly.  You don't like it?  Fine; arguing isn't for everyone.  You'd rather get murdered?  You are an idiot and I don't sugarcoat stupid women that prefer getting murdered to arguing.

If you see a bear in the woods, you mace them before they try and touch you.  If you mace a strange man in the woods before they try and touch you, then you're a monster.

If women prefer the bear to the rapist, then hey; rape is horrible and I'm not a rapist, so your opinion is your opinion even if I disagree.

But to be honest, I'd rather be in the woods with Hitler than a bear.  Sure, Hitler was a horrible dude that murdered millions of people, BUT I don't think I'M going to be one of those people (or at least I think my odds of survival are better than with a bear).

Now if you ask me, “Would you rather be in the woods with Hitler or Bernie Sanders?” then I will prefer the Jew over the Genocider.

But there is not a single human who I would pick the bear over (unless I knew they wanted to murder me, then it's on the fence as to who I can survive against better).

But I'm going to hate strange women because of this stupid ass stunt in 2024 that is plausibly why Harris isn't POTUS right now.  Congrats women; you played yourself you fucking dummies!  

But this has taught me that there should be a minimum IQ of 120 to vote in elections and a minimum IQ of 140 to run for public office; stupid people don't do shit like this.  If your IQ is below 120, then increase it to 120 and then you earn your voting rights.

How do women define creep: A strange man that talks to them for fun (even if it's not asking them out or flirting).

Any woman I talk to at this point in time (except my family) are going to be strange to me.  If this makes me a creep, then I'll wear the badge with honor; it's called being an extroverted adult male.

I've decided (and this is very tough to say) that there is nothing immoral about being an ideological hypocrite.  For example:

If you don't want to arrest the makers of this:

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/618DNn-65GL._UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg

But want to arrest the makers of generic child porn, then you're a hypocrite (and there is nothing immoral about that).  I am a hypocrite because of this and I OWN it (as virtually everyone would have too).

But that leaves the question, it seems (especially in 2025, when people are very polarized for their side) that you can't argue politics now; the left wants rehabilitation for rapists and murderers (unless the convict's name is Trump), they view retard as an ableist slur (unless it's at Elon Musk), and the right is proud to fat shame (unless it's Trump, then they are the most body positivity people on the planet).

Everyone wants to deport generic undocumented immigrants (or won't criticize their party head for doing it) but they would rather let the migrant in their home in the context of dating them than a member of the opposite party (which they wouldn't deport as much as they hate them).

Straight left wing men believe TWAW but wouldn't date them because they think it's gay (even if ideal in every other category).  Straight right wing men believe TWAM (and frauds) but won't want to prohibit HRT to crack down on what they believe is fraud.

  They both complain over watching an animal get killed that they end up eating.

The right preaches, “wait until marriage” (when they don't); the feminist left preaches on getting solar panels to combat climate change (when they don't for reasons that apply to a bunch of other people that they would want to get panels).

How can you change someone's mind on an issue when they don't really care about hypocrisy?  If you just can't change anyone's mind because people are so proud of their opinions as if it's a big part of their identity, then there is no point in debating on anything.

I'm only really making this post because it's a new idea.  I want ICE abolished for example, but I don't want to make a post about it because nobody who disagrees with me will change their mind on it because people are proud of their opinions (as if it's a defining part of their identity).