You cant learn about someone from his supporters or from his opponents. His supporters will hide all bad and only say the good. His opponents will hide all good and only say the bad. And both will use lies as well.
Research incompleteness theorem, and then realize what it means in debating where each claim depends on other to prove it and on lack of any disproving claim as well, thus lack of any true claim logically creates incomplete system. Further, lack of any true claim creates risk for system as a whole to be disproved, creating uncrertainty instead of proved true claims. To claim that system which has risk of being disproved at the same time reliably determines truth is a contradiction. To claim no system exists which can reliably determine truth means truth can never be reliably determined, which is a position which defeats itself as well.
"proposition can be denied if its opposite can be stated without contradiction"
It cannot be denied from a position of complete truth. Complete truth by definition includes all true claims. If something would include all true claims, that something would be omniscience. Lack of any true claim makes your position unable to reliably determine truth. Thus, to claim omniscience doesnt exist equals to saying truth cannot be reliably determined, a self defeating claim.
It is not possible to deny omniscience from a position of complete truth.
While this debate is too short to even include all meanings, "all powerful being" means being which has all powers, power being defined as ability to do something. So all powerful being can do everything. Maximum power simply means no greater power is possible. Maximally great means being present in all worlds.
God is an important topic for me, tho I understand that you dislike God because of what he did to China.
I am not sure, but maximum power outside of all powerful could even imply maximum power within given limits, and I dont want that. I admit I was also tempted to argue for divine being which is above everything else in power, but then I realized it would limit me to monotheism.
I only place shared burden of proof because voters on this site are so mean towards Pro that it doesnt even matter if it is shared burden of proof. Besides, atheist logically lives life as if God didnt exist, so I guess atheist should be brave enough to at least be able to prove that his lifestyle isnt completely wrong.
Users can pressure mods to remove posts or ban users, obviously? And spam bots do destroy free speech too, but thats a different issue.
So no votes on this? Alright.
You are number 1 on leaderboard now on this site. I think its at least great that you dont have to work from 1500 elo again. As for this debate, there might be new voting rules on this site I am not aware of. Maybe voters are allowed a bit more freedom in voting, like on debate.org. You will have to work with what is/becomes standard on this site.
Thank you for voting!
Good debate 😊
Maybe Savant can fix it using AI, but I dont know how familiar is he with Apple's OS or if it can be done without having to write a lot of new code.
Just buy some cheap basic windows laptop. I have seen people have issues with Apple's OS because sites, especially small sites, are generally tested for windows only. I never liked any of apple's devices because each limits you in some ways. They are closed systems. Iphone wont let you install apps, Apple computers have much less program support.
Its a device problem. Until he buys different device, it will stay. Now, we can figure out why his specific device is the only one to have such problem, but for that, we generally need screen shots, browser type and device type. It could be browser issue, it could be device issue. So my first suggestion for him is to try a different browser, just to see if problem is there.
Its fine, post whereever you want
And which part of that is not "predicting next word based on text learned"?
No, it is just word predicting program. They did put guide lines so it avoids some harmful and obviously false or bad content, but thats about it. It just predicts next word. The quality of AI is based on how good is it at predicting next word.
AI is just word predicting program. No, its not sentient. No, it doesnt reason. It just predicts the next word based on text it was trained on.
Thats a good argument, but I have reasons I am against abortion, which I am sure can be challenged depending on which country are we talking about. For example, abortion in Japan has much worse consequences for the country than abortion in afghanistan.
I dont think ChatGPT in debate should be banned. The guy who used ChatGPT on debate art had like 50% win rate. As long as other person agrees to such debate, its not a big issue, and AI can be good debater if programmed and trained well.
I dont think ChatGPT in debate should be banned. The guy who used ChatGPT on debate art had like 50% win rate. As long as other person agrees to such debate, its not a big issue, and AI can be good debater if programmed and trained well.
